Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[hadit]

The Bible and Lawn Boy among others.

Can't have kids learning that God loves them and they're supposed to love others.

 

[MinTrut]

Can't have kids learning that God loves them and they're supposed to love others.

Sure they can learn this.

But teaching them that it's okay for adults to abduct, rape, torture and murder them as the Bible does?

Not okay for under 12s.

The book's a masterpiece, but it is NOT for kids.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Watch it, you're dealing with a hall monitor

Indeed.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I encourage you to seek professional help for your delusional belief that this is happening.

^^^ trolling without content

 

[MinTrut]

^^^ trolling without content

^ Trolling without content.

My reply actually was on topic.

Do you wish to address the topic, or continue to troll?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

^ Trolling without content.

My reply actually was on topic.

Do you wish to address the topic, or continue to troll?

I'm good with trolling but I'm going to need to see your hall monitor badge please.

 

[MinTrut]

I'm good with trolling but I'm going to need to see your hall monitor badge please.

^ More trolling without content.

Submission/concession accepted.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

^ More trolling without content.

Submission/concession accepted.

Don't beat me too hard boss

 

[hadit]

Sure they can learn this.

But teaching them that it's okay for adults to abduct, rape, torture and murder them as the Bible does?

Not okay for under 12s.

The book's a masterpiece, but it is NOT for kids.

You don't understand the Bible if you think that's what it teaches. Do the Geneva Conventions teach kids it's okay for a foreign country to invade their homes and kill them as long as they don't use chemical or biological weapons? I say no.

 

[marvin martian]

Sure they can learn this.

But teaching them that it's okay for adults to abduct, rape, torture and murder them as the Bible does?

Not okay for under 12s.

The book's a masterpiece, but it is NOT for kids.

Your dedication to religious bigotry and hatred is impressive.

 

[DBA]

I encourage you to seek professional help for your delusional belief that this is happening.

Oh it's happening.

 

[koshergrl]

The Bible is actually worse than porn. It promotes murdering your child if God asks you to. The heroes who get to live and escape Sodom are the guy who offered up his daughters to be raped to save an angel and his daughters who got him drunk and committed an act on incestuous rape against him. The wife didn't make it though because she had the temerity to look back at the destruction.

There is no book responsible for more grooming than the Bible.

You should take that to the school board and demand they remove it. They probably already have, but go for it.
Meanwhile, let's fire the teachers who read unauthorized garbage to school kids.

 

[Dragonlady]

Are you seriously equating a parent wanting to control the information his/her young children have access to with Nazi's that held book burning parties? You're a special kind of person.

THINK! Are there really no books you would keep away from young children?

Exactly what is the difference? Just because these parents say these books are "inappropriate" doesn't mean they are. They're banning books about slavery, books for black students, Hispanic students, and Asian students. Anything that even mentions or has a gay character, whether its a sexual depiction or not.

What I find bizarre is that parents want to dictate what my children can see or have access to in the school library and I don’t think these so-called Christians have any business telling the rest of us how to live.

Why don't you concern yourselves with the graphic sexual depictions on public television???? On the internet????? Why don't you access the pornography that is all over public media, which is creating a culture where 1 in 5 girls are sexually assaulted before they leave high school?????

NO BOOK BANNINGS.

 

[Dragonlady]

You should take that to the school board and demand they remove it. They probably already have, but go for it.
Meanwhile, let's fire the teachers who read unauthorized garbage to school kids.

This is why Florida has no teachers. And why no one is going to want to be a teacher in future.

Meanwhile, let's expell the students whose parents who are making trouble for teachers.

 

[JoeB131]

I note that DBA read your post, giving it a laughing face.

But as with the NUMEROUS other examples of disturbing Bible content provided, she refuses to respond as an adult with integrity.

She's nothing more than a hypocritical troll at BEST.

She is the very danger she claims to hate and fear.

DBA is a he.. but you are right, he likes to pretend all that icky stuff isn't in the bible.

 

[JoeB131]

Exactly what is the difference? Just because these parents say these books are "inappropriate" doesn't mean they are. They're banning books about slavery, books for black students, Hispanic students, and Asian students. Anything that even mentions or has a gay character, whether its a sexual depiction or not.

What I find bizarre is that parents want to dictate what my children can see or have access to in the school library and I don’t think these so-called Christians have any business telling the rest of us how to live.

Why don't you concern yourselves with the graphic sexual depictions on public television???? On the internet????? Why don't you access the pornography that is all over public media, which is creating a culture where 1 in 5 girls are sexually assaulted before they leave high school?????

NO BOOK BANNINGS.

Quite right. Frankly, I worry a lot less about a book like "Not all Boys are Blue" and a lot more about the Twilight Series, which has some pretty negative messages for women about getting into bad relationships or thinking you can change a bad man into something good.

'Twilight' sets a bad example for girls

The second movie in the "Twilight" series was released on DVD this weekend and is expected to set sales records, proving that the teen vampires are not going away anytime soon.If banning books were something I supported, the "Twilight" saga would be among the first to go. Poor writing and plot struc

www.usforacle.com

Poor writing and plot structure aside, the “Twilight” novels are not appropriate for young girls. When all the pretty words and romantic ideals are taken out of Stephenie Meyer’s famous work, it boils down to creepiness.

Bella, the main character, is weak, uninspiring and doesn’t portray a strong woman. Instead, once she meets Edward – a glittering, morally-torn vampire – she becomes entirely dependent on him. Later in the novels, she gives up her future and the chance to go to a great college to marry him.

Bella and Edward’s relationship is disturbing at times. Edward watches Bella while she sleeps, stares at her intently in the day time, occasionally makes Bella fearful, has the ability to harm or kill her – if only accidentally – and becomes infuriated when she is with other people, going as far as to damage her truck to prevent her from seeing someone.

He repeatedly warns Bella of how dangerous he is, and she continues to stay in the relationship because she believes they’re really in love. When he leaves her, she begins showing signs of suicidal tendencies, but she immediately takes him back when he returns.

 

[hadit]

Exactly what is the difference? Just because these parents say these books are "inappropriate" doesn't mean they are. They're banning books about slavery, books for black students, Hispanic students, and Asian students. Anything that even mentions or has a gay character, whether its a sexual depiction or not.

What banning? No one is saying these books can't be published, just that they're inappropriate for children to read. THAT is the difference, and it's extremely sad that you pretend you don't see it.

What I find bizarre is that parents want to dictate what my children can see or have access to in the school library and I don’t think these so-called Christians have any business telling the rest of us how to live.

As has been said, if you want your children to have access to pornography, you can do that in your own home.

Why don't you concern yourselves with the graphic sexual depictions on public television???? On the internet????? Why don't you access the pornography that is all over public media, which is creating a culture where 1 in 5 girls are sexually assaulted before they leave high school?????

NO BOOK BANNINGS.

They do go after those things as well. The difference being that their children are required to be in school, so it's on the school to give them appropriate material to read in the libraries. Have you not seen parents getting in trouble for reading books in schoolboard meetings that their children can easily access in the library, but are not appropriate for adults to hear?

 

[Votar Roja]

Look at the Leftists all defending the Pedo Groomers. Disgusting

 

[Votar Roja]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

After 38 pages of thread I still don't see one Democrat denouncing local democrats putting sick porn in little kids school.

Meanwhile, Republicans want to remove filthy porn from little kids schools, and the sick degenerate democrats call that "banning books". Democrats are the Enemy

 

[MinTrut]

You don't understand the Bible if you think that's what it teaches.

Someone hasn't read/doesn't understand the Bible.

Or is in profound denial of what they have read.

Do the Geneva Conventions teach kids it's okay for a foreign country to invade their homes and kill them as long as they don't use chemical or biological weapons? I say no.

Oooooooookay...