Liz Warren

[LeftofLeft]

She's the female Obama, a shady past, a pathological lair, a deep hatred of America and a longing and loving for a Marxist Dictatorship in the USA. The one main difference between the two is that Liz is certifiable, you have to go to Biden to find someone in the Obama orbit that is truly that crazy.

Have you seen her high cheekbones? They have "I'm a pathological liar who was a lonely and sad housewife, going nowhere in life until I invented an Indian ancestry" written all over them!

Papaw said the cheekbones verify she is 1/32 Cherokee.

 

[LeftofLeft]

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

You idiots obsess over the American Native thing if you want. You do that because you can't find anything else on her. Nothing.

You voted twice for a big baby who went to war because Saddam "...tried to kill my daddy". So go find another infantile, adolescent airhead to run against her. Shouldn't be hard if you're looking within the GOP.

You voted for a guy twice who believed on the premise that his signature legislation hinged on 1)Lack of Transparency and 2) The so called stupidity of the American Voter.

Your People's legacy.

 

[rightwinger]

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

We saw it with the treatment of the rabid left concerning the very middle class person Sara Palin. You can't do what you did to Palin's family and now cry fowl. Take your medicine.

Yeah, but even Republicans knew that Palin wasn't qualified - big difference.

If that be the case they you must know Warren isn't qualified. I voted for McCain because of Palin not in spite of. If not for her I would have passed.

Surely you jest. Palin, we don't even know if she ever graduated from any of the 6 colleges she attended doesn't compare to Warren in any way. And, just because you voted for Palin doesn't mean she's qualified. The very fact that you are comparing her to Warren just shows that you don't have any idea about qualifications.

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

We saw it with the treatment of the rabid left concerning the very middle class person Sara Palin. You can't do what you did to Palin's family and now cry fowl. Take your medicine.

Yeah, but even Republicans knew that Palin wasn't qualified - big difference.

If that be the case they you must know Warren isn't qualified. I voted for McCain because of Palin not in spite of. If not for her I would have passed.

Surely you jest. Palin, we don't even know if she ever graduated from any of the 6 colleges she attended doesn't compare to Warren in any way. And, just because you voted for Palin doesn't mean she's qualified. The very fact that you are comparing her to Warren just shows that you don't have any idea about qualifications.

Don't call me Shirley

 

[HenryBHough]

If we have to have a Democrat president then Fauxahontas would be the best possible choice for political cartoonists to lampoon......if they dared.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Roadrunner]

O

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

We saw it with the treatment of the rabid left concerning the very middle class person Sara Palin. You can't do what you did to Palin's family and now cry fowl. Take your medicine.

Yeah, but even Republicans knew that Palin wasn't qualified - big difference.

If that be the case they you must know Warren isn't qualified. I voted for McCain because of Palin not in spite of. If not for her I would have passed.

Surely you jest. Palin, we don't even know if she ever graduated from any of the 6 colleges she attended doesn't compare to Warren in any way. And, just because you voted for Palin doesn't mean she's qualified. The very fact that you are comparing her to Warren just shows that you don't have any idea about qualifications.

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

We saw it with the treatment of the rabid left concerning the very middle class person Sara Palin. You can't do what you did to Palin's family and now cry fowl. Take your medicine.

Yeah, but even Republicans knew that Palin wasn't qualified - big difference.

If that be the case they you must know Warren isn't qualified. I voted for McCain because of Palin not in spite of. If not for her I would have passed.

Surely you jest. Palin, we don't even know if she ever graduated from any of the 6 colleges she attended doesn't compare to Warren in any way. And, just because you voted for Palin doesn't mean she's qualified. The very fact that you are comparing her to Warren just shows that you don't have any idea about qualifications.

Don't call me Shirley

OK LaVerne.

 

[Ame®icano]

You have nothing to say. You just post cartoons. You are a cartoon, too and a joke.

Why Thank you!

Her Indian name would be "One That Stand on Lies". In fact, progressive leaders all have multiple aliases, just like people that voted for them. Dear chairman leads in that category, Barack, a.k.a. Barry has Indian name too: Lead From Behind.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You voted for a guy twice who believed on the premise that his signature legislation hinged on 1)Lack of Transparency and 2) The so called stupidity of the American Voter.

Your People's legacy.

Obama was always a dangerous scumbag. He once said that he shared 1 million votes with Bush 43( when he ran for Senate). He said there was enough common ground that he could work with Republicans. What he meant was that he could lie to them and trick them into supporting his communist agenda. Obama is of the ilk that spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb!



Norman Thomas quotes:

The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.


This was precisely the tactic of “infiltration” advocated by Lenin and Stalin.[3] As Communist International General Secretary Georgi Dimitroff told the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern in 1935:
"Comrades, you remember the ancient tale of the capture of Troy. Troy was inaccessible to the armies attacking her, thanks to her impregnable walls. And the attacking army, after suffering many sacrifices, was unable to achieve victory until, with the aid of the famous Trojan horse, it managed to penetrate to the very heart of the enemy’s camp."[4]

C. S. Lewis on Diabolical Democracy Socialism and Public Education Conservative Colloquium


Buckley endorsed Chambers’ analysis of modern liberalism as a watered-down version of Communist ideology. The New Deal, Chambers insists, is not liberal democratic but “revolutionary” in its nature and intentions, seeking “a basic change in the social and, above all, the power relationships within the nation.”

"I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
--- Roger Nash Baldwin

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Ame®icano]

 

[TooTall]

And the character assassination begins, how did conservatives come to see concern for the plight of working people as such a horrible threat?

Warren assassinated her own character by pretending to be part Native American to gain an advantage. Everybody wanted on the phony diversity bandwagon and there she was.

 

[TooTall]

.

I think the GOP makes fun of her at their own risk.

.

The democrats will fall into the same trap if she runs and becomes a threat to Hillary.

I'm not very good at this stuff, but I get the distinct impression there is far more excitement about Liz than Hillary in the party, no?

.

Hillary will get a lot of money from Wall Street and Warren will get very little. I don't really care since neither one of them could do anything that would even tempt me to vote for them.

 

[Rozman]

I can't stop laughing.....
Well done.

 

[TooTall]

J

.

I think the GOP makes fun of her at their own risk.

.

The democrats will fall into the same trap if she runs and becomes a threat to Hillary.

I'm not very good at this stuff, but I get the distinct impression there is far more excitement about Liz than Hillary in the party, no?

.

Hell yea people will get more excited about Warren. She's a populist. Hillary is a plutocrat.

Why would people want to be subjected to all the bullshit the Republican will bring down on Hillary in the event she was elected. We'd have more Jodie Foster, more land deals, more on blow jobs and Bill would be in the background.

No thanks.

Jodie Foster????

Did she have sex will Bill, or Hillary?

I heard with both of them, at the same time. And, I refuse to divulge my anonymous source.

 

[TooTall]

That's essentially my point. While the GOP is laughing and talking about her foray into PC with the "native American" schtick, they're completely missing the fact that her brand of populism is gaining momentum, plus she presents it so well. There is no Republican who presents anything nearly as well as she does that.

Put her on a national stage with her skills, combine that with the facts (the inequality numbers don't lie and everyone can see what's going on once it's pointed out clearly), and you have a formidable candidate. If she runs.

There is no Republican who presents anything that well because the Republican message is based on "how do we fool them today?"

If they talked about how their job is to make the rich richer, they really would lose to corky the retard explaining that inequality doesn't work.

Instead, they play the race card, the religion card, the gay card and that poor person wants half your cookie after the Koch brothers ate all the rest of them.

There is no Republican who presents anything that well because the Republican message is based on "how do we fool them today?"

Are you out of your mind...
Have you not seen at least one story about Gruber on how ObamaCare got through?

Well maybe not I'm sure MSNBC has a ban on covering that news.

Saying this about the GOP when all the videos of Gruber bragging about how they lied their way to getting OCare passed is laughable.

I have to give credit when credit is due. Joe was gone and Mika brought up Gruber on the Morning Joe show. It was pathetic to watch several of her bedwetters on the panel make excuses for him, but she didn't stonewall the story as most of the major networks have.

 

[Shrimpbox]

Mac I think your observations are on point. Democrats are not scared to lie(because the press will not do their due diligence on them) and republicans are scared to tell the truth because most of them are pantywaists and they do not have the courage of their convictions.

Warren is glib and a quick study but she is also a liar and a demagogue. I would agree with her characterizations that Wall Street has run roughshod over Americans and republicans should take the same tact as her. What Wall Street did(as well as what the govt did) collapsed the economy of this country. It was bad for America so all citizens should be against it. If you also take the min wage issue off the table( I have made suggestions on how to handle this) Warren has nothing to stand on. While there will be screams of horror from our lefties, there is a conservative populism to be promoted. Do we need better messengers, yes. Do we need better clarity on the message yes. But Warren is so doable in a debate. There has never been a more unamerican statement made by any American politician than "you didn't build that" . She is a political wannabe, a cross between the Texas Barbie and Barack Obama with an unbridled ambition encouraged by leftist talent scouts. I am not scared of Warren, it will be republican ineptitude not warrens acumen if she is successful. In fact I would relish the opportunity to debate a woman so virulently anti American. Know your enemy!

 

[percysunshine]

.

Can't the Democrats come up with at least one candidate who is not a communist?

What ever happened to Mondale or Dukakis or Truman or Humphrey or Johnson?

.

 

[Roadrunner]

.

Can't the Democrats come up with at least one candidate who is not a communist?

What ever happened to Mondale or Dukakis or Truman or Humphrey or Johnson?

.

They are non-persons, never to be mentioned.

Most especially, LBJ, who lied us into a war with 60,000 US deaths, and millions of poor Vietnamese peasant deaths.

Compare to Bush's war, which resulted from a vote of Congress like Vietnam never got, and 6,000 US deaths and maybe 200,000 Iraqi deaths, most of which were caused by sectarian bombings.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Character assassination is all they've got.

Not at all. We also have the ability and willingness to engage in physical assassination, not just character assassination.

Are you making a threat on Liz Warrens life? Should you be reported as dangerous to Liz Warren?
Hum. Who to call.

Are your panties now soiled?

 

[thereisnospoon]

.

I think the GOP makes fun of her at their own risk.

.

The democrats will fall into the same trap if she runs and becomes a threat to Hillary.

I'm not very good at this stuff, but I get the distinct impression there is far more excitement about Liz than Hillary in the party, no?

.

Hell yea people will get more excited about Warren. She's a populist. Hillary is a plutocrat.

Why would people want to be subjected to all the bullshit the Republican will bring down on Hillary in the event she was elected. We'd have more Jodie Foster, more land deals, more on blow jobs and Bill would be in the background.

No thanks.

"people"?...No...Just you.