Two Thumbs
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #41
the article lied.The point of the article is that the companies could have stayed, made a profit, and let the workers have a greater say in what happened.Spin it however you want, but you should read the article View attachment 40515
How ironic, I read your article and it's full of "spin" for sure...
I've already briefly touched on why the auto companies needed a bailout - aka the /only/ actual capitalism aspect of the argument.
However, even if you wish to argue that the automakers pulling out of Detroit itself is "the cause" of Detroit's decline then you're looking back some 65 years because auto makers have been pulling out of Detroit since the 1950's - and a big part of that reason was merely physical space limitations. Detroit failed itself.
Some for articles for you to consider as well:
Motor City The Story of Detroit The Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History
Who Killed Detroit
U.S. Automakers Thrive as Detroit Goes Bankrupt - Bloomberg Business
Why did Detroit go bankrupt - National Globalnews.ca
surprise surprise, a leftist hack site lied about capitalism.
I'm shocked
![neutral :neutral: :neutral:](/styles/smilies/neutral.gif)