LogikAndReazon
Gold Member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 5,351
- 668
- 190
You know some clueless adolescent leftist twit will be ecstatic that the u rate when down to 7.6 percent.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right now, there are penalties for reinvestment in political terms. Additionally, there are a lot....and I mean A LOT of resources that are being expended to deal with the AHA that will be hitting us at the end of the year.One would think that with all the great profits companies have been showing that they'd take that money and reinvest it in themselves to improve their infrastructures and expand their businesses, thus creating jobs.
That's is what is happening in Germany.
I spoke with a German fellow who heads up an investor group looking to invest in American manufacturing companies. He stated that he is having a tough time finding American companies that would be good investments. He said it's not the state of the companies balance sheet but it's what these companies do with their profits. In America a large majority profits go to the shareholders and very little comes back for reinvesting into the company, where as in Germany it's the opposite. What the practice of reinvesting back within the companies does is modernize their operations and give the companies opportunities to expand their operations and thusly expand their profits long-term. He said companies that don't reinvest in themselves are poor investments because they are not trying being competitive.
Look at Germany's unemployment pattern thanks to the aggressive approach German companies are taking.
None of which is true. But you run with that. They have been cutting back because there was no economic activity to justify the expense of employees beyond their need. They have NOT had low taxes, low interest rates are harming them through inflation and devaluation of the dollar, and this country is so heavily regulated that the individual is in violation of two laws before the even brush their teeth in the morning.Employers are cutting back because Obama care is only 9 months away.
Many companies, in order to remain in business, are cutting full time employees to part time employee to avoid the costs. Which is why I was surprised by the number of hours per week number going up. The article attributes that to overtime, but I think it has more to do with the increase of people working from the past twelve months.
However, the jobs report in April really aren't the ones to watch for. When we get into September to December, then we'll see how much the new tyranny will cost us.
They were "cutting back" before and off shoring jobs.
What was the trouble then? Eh?
They had everything they asked for..low taxes..low interest rates and soft regulation.
They absolutely failed to hire in droves.
Quite the opposite. They off shored.
Fail.
Epically.
Not only have government employees not lost their jobs, but the government intends to hire tens of thousands of new employees as "Navigators" to explain obamacare to individuals.
Ummmm perhaps you can't read the chart: Table B-1 of the Employment Situation
Government jobs dropped 7,000 with Federal jobs dropping 14,000 (mostly USPS). While state government increased 9,000, local governments dropped 2,000.
federal government only lost 7000 jobs
if anything is costing jobs my bet is it is the result of the PPACA
Not only have government employees not lost their jobs, but the government intends to hire tens of thousands of new employees as "Navigators" to explain obamacare to individuals.
Ummmm perhaps you can't read the chart: Table B-1 of the Employment Situation
Government jobs dropped 7,000 with Federal jobs dropping 14,000 (mostly USPS). While state government increased 9,000, local governments dropped 2,000.
7000 of how many employed? 2 million 766 thousand. A drop in the bucket. They hired 14,000 the month before. And the USPS is due to their over run budget which has been an ongoing problem for decades in which they had re-payment of loans come due.
federal government only lost 7000 jobs
if anything is costing jobs my bet is it is the result of the PPACA
Only?
That doesn't take into account attrition and not replacing retiring employees.
This is unprecedented.
Lowest job participation rate since 1979
Oh look. The resident 'head in ass' expert has opined.So Congressional attempts to reign in the economy are working
God bless the sequester
Pulling money out of the economy results in reduced jobs growth.......surprise, surprise, surprise
Ummmm perhaps you can't read the chart: Table B-1 of the Employment Situation
Government jobs dropped 7,000 with Federal jobs dropping 14,000 (mostly USPS). While state government increased 9,000, local governments dropped 2,000.
7000 of how many employed? 2 million 766 thousand. A drop in the bucket. They hired 14,000 the month before. And the USPS is due to their over run budget which has been an ongoing problem for decades in which they had re-payment of loans come due.
The USPS, because of conservative policies, are forced to finance retirement funds at levels not seen by any business or other government institution.
That, and they can't raise the price on services without congressional approval.
It's no secret conservatives are trying to kill a service mandated by the Constitution.
federal government only lost 7000 jobs
if anything is costing jobs my bet is it is the result of the PPACA
Only?
That doesn't take into account attrition and not replacing retiring employees.
This is unprecedented.
federal government only lost 7000 jobs
if anything is costing jobs my bet is it is the result of the PPACA
Only?
That doesn't take into account attrition and not replacing retiring employees.
This is unprecedented.
Are you saying sequester is the full reason for this? How many trillions is the government spending?
7000 of how many employed? 2 million 766 thousand. A drop in the bucket. They hired 14,000 the month before. And the USPS is due to their over run budget which has been an ongoing problem for decades in which they had re-payment of loans come due.
The USPS, because of conservative policies, are forced to finance retirement funds at levels not seen by any business or other government institution.
That, and they can't raise the price on services without congressional approval.
It's no secret conservatives are trying to kill a service mandated by the Constitution.
ya pumping 85 billion a month into the stock market is austerity. barry is taking care of his rich buddies.
austerity my ass
Only?
That doesn't take into account attrition and not replacing retiring employees.
This is unprecedented.
Are you saying sequester is the full reason for this? How many trillions is the government spending?
Full? No. Partial? Yes.
And "the trillions" in government spending was done by conservatives when they saw fit to cut taxes and invade/conquer/nation build 2 countries.
We are looking more like Greece every day.
Now you know why sane people didnt want the sequester to go through
So you are trying to tell us that taking $22 billion out of a $16 trillion economy, which is less than 1%, is crippling the recovery?
Are you that stupid?
Never mind, I forgot who I was talking to, my bad.
500,000 people dropped out of the work force. 7 thousand is a tick under 1.5% of that number. The effects of government loss is negligible. Most of the job loss in the US Government was USPS and that was people retiring out early.Not only have government employees not lost their jobs, but the government intends to hire tens of thousands of new employees as "Navigators" to explain obamacare to individuals.
Ummmm perhaps you can't read the chart: Table B-1 of the Employment Situation
Government jobs dropped 7,000 with Federal jobs dropping 14,000 (mostly USPS). While state government increased 9,000, local governments dropped 2,000.
7000 of how many employed? 2 million 766 thousand. A drop in the bucket. They hired 14,000 the month before. And the USPS is due to their over run budget which has been an ongoing problem for decades in which they had re-payment of loans come due.
Only?
That doesn't take into account attrition and not replacing retiring employees.
This is unprecedented.
Are you saying sequester is the full reason for this? How many trillions is the government spending?
Full? No. Partial? Yes.
And "the trillions" in government spending was done by conservatives when they saw fit to cut taxes and invade/conquer/nation build 2 countries.