Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd like you to point one out that isn't that looney. It's facts like theirs that started the Iraq invasion. Collin Powell was the one giving the yellow cake "fact", and he's supposed to be the least looney of the bunch.You certainly aren't capable of connecting any dots......you've been drinking too much of the KoolAid.
Fact: The US military is supposedly heavily involved in the "search" yet has not found anything.....
Fact: Barak Hussein Obama is the Commander In Chief of the US Military
Fact: Barak Hussein is a Muslim name
Fact: Muslim's have hijcked aircraft
The Facts speak for themselves as much as any other facts related to this thread.
I'm just glad that not everyone in your party is that looney. You may be dangerous.
I enjoy reading shit posted by idiots without a clue - it makes me laugh.
I see a photo of the pilot, wearing a political T shirt (That can be bought as a fashion item in many shops) and that makes him a potential extremist.
Those more familiar with Malaysia will be aware, the more extreme Muslim elements over there have nothing to do with the Chinese but, as we see here, the pilot's mate was Chinese.
That doesn't really work out if you want to call him an extremist, especially when the evidence is a load of old crap anyway.
My prediction, which isn't worth a whole lot, is that the plane will be found on the original flight path.
i do too
there is a guy who was working an oil rig off the shore of Vietnam
who says he saw a plane on fire at the same time this happened
on about the same heading
in about the same location
Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Flight In Flames - Business Insider
My prediction, which isn't worth a whole lot, is that the plane will be found on the original flight path.
i do too
there is a guy who was working an oil rig off the shore of Vietnam
who says he saw a plane on fire at the same time this happened
on about the same heading
in about the same location
Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Flight In Flames - Business Insider
I think that is likely the case.
If the rig worker saw the 777 "in flames" the entire world would know the 'rig workers' location right? Ergo they would have a damned good idea where the plane was when the rig worker saw it right? Ergo an extensive air search would have spotted some debris b/c the 777 wasn't going very far "in flames" right? A 777 is a BIG piece of kit right?My prediction, which isn't worth a whole lot, is that the plane will be found on the original flight path.
i do too
there is a guy who was working an oil rig off the shore of Vietnam
who says he saw a plane on fire at the same time this happened
on about the same heading
in about the same location
Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Flight In Flames - Business Insider
I think that is likely the case.
When this is all finally settled I hope the airline industry makes some critical changes so this never happens again. Namely making it impossible to turn off transponders and installing GPS systems so 'lost' planes can't get lost any more.
When this is all finally settled I hope the airline industry makes some critical changes so this never happens again. Namely making it impossible to turn off transponders and installing GPS systems so 'lost' planes can't get lost any more.
If you make it impossible to turn off the transponders, ATC is going to have a hell of a mess with all the airplanes pinging away at the gates and maintenance areas.
Just sayin'
When this is all finally settled I hope the airline industry makes some critical changes so this never happens again. Namely making it impossible to turn off transponders and installing GPS systems so 'lost' planes can't get lost any more.
If you make it impossible to turn off the transponders, ATC is going to have a hell of a mess with all the airplanes pinging away at the gates and maintenance areas.
Just sayin'
Is that why they're disableable? Makes sense, but if removing that option prevents 9/11s and 370 events it'd be worth a little extra clutter on the ground.
PASSENGERS on the missing Malaysia Airlines flight would not have passed out as the plane climbed to 45,000 feet, above its maximum flying altitude, according to a leading aviation expert.
Former Qantas head of safety Ron Bartsch dismissed speculation the erratic change in altitude shortly after contact with the plane was cut off was an attempt to render passengers unconscious.
There would be a lot easier ways of doing that, he said.
Youd just have to depressurise the plane gradually so that the passengers wouldnt notice and then put on your oxygen mask.
Mr Bartsch said it was more likely the person in the cockpit was making a deliberate attempt to disappear from radar.
i do too
there is a guy who was working an oil rig off the shore of Vietnam
who says he saw a plane on fire at the same time this happened
on about the same heading
in about the same location
Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Flight In Flames - Business Insider
I think that is likely the case.
There are also 80,000 flights a day around the world. How do we know it happens to be the same plane? It is likely but how do we know it wasn't another plane? No other planes have maintenance problems?
If the rig worker saw the 777 "in flames" the entire world would know the 'rig workers' location right? Ergo they would have a damned good idea where the plane was when the rig worker saw it right? Ergo an extensive air search would have spotted some debris b/c the 777 wasn't going very far "in flames" right? A 777 is a BIG piece of kit right?i do too
there is a guy who was working an oil rig off the shore of Vietnam
who says he saw a plane on fire at the same time this happened
on about the same heading
in about the same location
Oil Rig Worker Thinks He Saw Malaysia Flight In Flames - Business Insider
I think that is likely the case.
The 'rig worker' was lying or mistaken. BTW was the 'rig worker' the only man on the rig at the time? He didn't say: "Look everyone! That's a big MF plane on fire"? Ya right.
If the rig worker saw the 777 "in flames" the entire world would know the 'rig workers' location right? Ergo they would have a damned good idea where the plane was when the rig worker saw it right? Ergo an extensive air search would have spotted some debris b/c the 777 wasn't going very far "in flames" right? A 777 is a BIG piece of kit right?I think that is likely the case.
The 'rig worker' was lying or mistaken. BTW was the 'rig worker' the only man on the rig at the time? He didn't say: "Look everyone! That's a big MF plane on fire"? Ya right.
It may have gone out of sight too fast for him to tell someone else in time to see it.
Officials revealed a new timeline Monday suggesting the final voice transmission from the cockpit of the missing Malaysian plane may have occurred before any of its communications systems were disabled, adding more uncertainty about who aboard might have been to blame.
Malaysian officials said earlier that those words came after one of the jetliner's data communications systems - the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System - had been switched off, suggesting the voice from the cockpit may have been trying to deceive ground controllers.
If the rig worker saw the 777 "in flames" the entire world would know the 'rig workers' location right? Ergo they would have a damned good idea where the plane was when the rig worker saw it right? Ergo an extensive air search would have spotted some debris b/c the 777 wasn't going very far "in flames" right? A 777 is a BIG piece of kit right?
The 'rig worker' was lying or mistaken. BTW was the 'rig worker' the only man on the rig at the time? He didn't say: "Look everyone! That's a big MF plane on fire"? Ya right.
It may have gone out of sight too fast for him to tell someone else in time to see it.
How could you tell if one was on fire or not? They fly so far away that they look smaller than a dime in the air. If he could see it, that means that they were in serious trouble because the fire would have to be too big to notice but the fact that there is no plane contradicts that theory for now.
If the rig worker saw the 777 "in flames" the entire world would know the 'rig workers' location right? Ergo they would have a damned good idea where the plane was when the rig worker saw it right? Ergo an extensive air search would have spotted some debris b/c the 777 wasn't going very far "in flames" right? A 777 is a BIG piece of kit right?
The 'rig worker' was lying or mistaken. BTW was the 'rig worker' the only man on the rig at the time? He didn't say: "Look everyone! That's a big MF plane on fire"? Ya right.
It may have gone out of sight too fast for him to tell someone else in time to see it.
How could you tell if one was on fire or not? They fly so far away that they look smaller than a dime in the air. If he could see it, that means that they were in serious trouble because the fire would have to be too big to notice but the fact that there is no plane contradicts that theory for now.
