bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
How is it stupid?That is just stupid.
But not unexpected.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
How is it stupid?That is just stupid.
But not unexpected.
Duh. Gym is getting his hand slapped for meddling in affairs he has no business doing.Its a tactic, a ploy. Actually the law suit is meant to intimidate Jordan / the committee, delay the subpoenas, and delay having to provide the Oversight Committee the documents
Just don't blow your load.I won't be surprised when Bragg calls Jordan a 'racist' next.
It is normal for you to be thinking about men ejaculating, is it?Just don't blow your load.
Hey dumbfuck, Bragg has admitted he used FEDERAL money. Putting Jordan in a position of oversight. Oops. Now please keep your fantasies of men blowing loads in front of you to yourself.Duh. Gym is getting his hand slapped for meddling in affairs he has no business doing.
Just don't blow your load.
I thought there was talk that Bragg was going to be disbarred. The public needs protection from people who act like he does.![]()
Manhattan's top prosecutor sues to stop Republican 'intimidation' in Trump case
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on Tuesday sued Republican U.S. Representative Jim Jordan to stop what Bragg called a "campaign of intimidation" against the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump in New York.www.reuters.com
This guy Bragg thinks he's a little dictator over in NY doesn't he? I can't wait til he's behind bars and fired!
Manhattan DA Bragg and the DA involved in the Perry case both are Soros funded and there for one purpose to use our laws as tools against political opponentsI thought there was talk that Bragg was going to be disbarred. The public needs protection from people who act like he does.
Every DA receives some Federal Tax dollars
Does not give Congress authority to harass local prosecutors
Jordan can explain it to the judge
So what? That’s federal funds, putting Bragg under federal jurisdiction and oversight. Oops.
LOL at you. He used FEDERAL money. That puts him under FEDERAL oversight. Period. End of argument. You seem to think Bragg can bring federal charges at the state level after the feds refused to prosecute.LOL
You think Congress gets to control local prosecutions over $5,000 in confiscated funds?
I have never seen even the scantest evidence that he ever indulges in that particular process at all.. You seem to think
Regardless, if he used it for a state investigation appears to be an issue.That was from money seized and from before Bragg investigated Trump.
![]()
Manhattan's top prosecutor sues to stop Republican 'intimidation' in Trump case
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg on Tuesday sued Republican U.S. Representative Jim Jordan to stop what Bragg called a "campaign of intimidation" against the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump in New York.www.reuters.com
Bragg's office has told the committee it used $5,000 in federal funds to investigate Trump and his namesake family company from 2019 to 2021.The office said that money came from $1 billion of asset forfeiture it secured for the government in the last 15 years.
You and others have not impugned that?Yes I know.
Were they used for federal crimes is the issue.You think Congress gets to control local prosecutions over $5,000 in confiscated funds?
LOL
You think Congress gets to control local prosecutions over $5,000 in confiscated funds?
It may be if the money was spent on a state, and not a federal investigation.That is not even small claim's court.
That's barely small claim's court.You think Congress gets to control local prosecutions over $5,000 in confiscated funds?
Were they used for federal crimes is the issue.
Nobody seems to notice, Bragg's subpoena is to stop Mike Pomerantnz from testifying about revelations he made in his recent book on the Bragg investigations, about these issues are politically motivated.
God forbid that comes out.
So you think it's ok for a DA to go after political opponents?
Yes. Because men ejaculate. Who knows why.It is normal for you to be thinking about men ejaculating, is it?