Same link as in my post. Did you actually read the Pielke article? Are you OK with press releases stating all that crap about a new hockey stick and Marcott basking in the attention and giving interviews, only to have him turn around afterwards and say they misquoted me I never said the 20th century portion was relevant or significant. In fact it was extremely close to fraud as was amply shown.
I don't care about press releases. The press rarely gets it right whenever they talk about science. I roll my eyes nearly every time I read a news article about anything to do with science. If it isn't the grammar and spelling, it is the incorrect usage of terms, and downright just getting the science wrong. After all, they aren't the best journalists in the business. Those guys work for 60 minutes. lol
Climate science is no exception with respect to the press getting things wrong. I do care about Marcott's paper, which I happen to think it very good.
You avoided Ian's question.
I stand by my statement.
Which addresses nothing.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. You do know what they say about opinions, right?
I don't think my opinion of your response could get any lower than it already is.