It is revealing that you do not understand the basic tenet of law that the "defendant" is innocent until proven guilty.Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is revealing that you do not understand the basic tenet of law that the "defendant" is innocent until proven guilty.Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.
You listened. Thats why you replied.No you did not actually.I demand that the FBI investigate this matter.That does not give him the power to make demands.Kav can definitely demand that Drumpf order the FBI to investigate. He is Drumpfs nominee.Then it is on him not Kavanaugh.They had to deny. Its not in their jurisdiction. Thats where Drumpf comes in. He can order them to investigate.
Either way there is only an unfounded accusation.
Are you saying I have more power than Kav? I just made a demand.
No one listened
He isnt a defendant. This isnt a court of law. Youre getting mixed up.It is revealing that you do not understand the basic tenet of law that the "defendant" is innocent until proven guilty.Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.
I never said someone accused him of rape. I said I think he is rapist because more women have come forward accusing him of sexual assault. Most attempted rapists eventually succeed.You can use the search engine of your choice. I'm not going do your work for you.I think he is a rapist because most rapists attempt it more than once. No wonder 2 more women have accused him.Why would you think that, there has been no allegation of rape. You're just another dishonest hack that believes the ends justifies the means no need for facts. FU
.
Oh, please do link to where even one woman has accused him of rape, let alone 3.
I've been following the stories and I've not seen even one accusation of rape. I've seen one unsubstantiated accusation of drunken fumbling that went nowhere and one unsubstantiated accusation of somebody that might have been him waving a willy in somebody's face. Humor me, link to all three accusations of rape.
Or he is thinking like a rapist that understands if the FBI doesnt gather evidence he will skate and be appointed regardless of what cloud hangs over his name.I know he can demand all he wants. Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.Kav can definitely demand that Drumpf order the FBI to investigate. He is Drumpfs nominee.Then it is on him not Kavanaugh.They had to deny. Its not in their jurisdiction. Thats where Drumpf comes in. He can order them to investigate.
Either way there is only an unfounded accusation.
He can demand all he wants, but the president doesn't have to do it. Who's this Drumpf character?
He's probably thinking like a judge and trusting in the rule of law and rules of evidence. In his world, an accuser has to make his/her case and is not automatically believed. He doesn't inhabit the emotion driven world where things are believed just because reasons and stuff, so to him this is so preposterous that there's no reason to dignify it with the FBI, and stuff.
I agree Clinton should be in prisonI never said someone accused him of rape. I said I think he is rapist because more women have come forward accusing him of sexual assault. Most attempted rapists eventually succeed.You can use the search engine of your choice. I'm not going do your work for you.I think he is a rapist because most rapists attempt it more than once. No wonder 2 more women have accused him.
Oh, please do link to where even one woman has accused him of rape, let alone 3.
I've been following the stories and I've not seen even one accusation of rape. I've seen one unsubstantiated accusation of drunken fumbling that went nowhere and one unsubstantiated accusation of somebody that might have been him waving a willy in somebody's face. Humor me, link to all three accusations of rape.
Thank you for clarifying that you think he's a rapist even though he's not been accused of rape. You might want to think about that. You do realize, don't you, that by that standard, Bill Clinton should be in jail for a very long time?
What are you talking about? Polish said to get finger prints and DNA for evidence. How do you do that if no one investigates the accusations?In order to get finger prints and DNA wouldnt someone have to start an investigation?How do you provide evidence someone grabbed your ass or your breasts?
Two ways, besides witnesses.
Fingerprints can be lifted and compared to those of the accused.
Second, when you touch something, you leave some of your DNA behind.
What if you have on gloves?
Damn, what if you weren't there? Children play the games you and your commies are trying to play, grow the fuck up.
.
He isnt a defendant. This isnt a court of law. Youre getting mixed up.It is revealing that you do not understand the basic tenet of law that the "defendant" is innocent until proven guilty.Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.
Or he is thinking like a rapist that understands if the FBI doesnt gather evidence he will skate and be appointed regardless of what cloud hangs over his name.I know he can demand all he wants. Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.Kav can definitely demand that Drumpf order the FBI to investigate. He is Drumpfs nominee.Then it is on him not Kavanaugh.
Either way there is only an unfounded accusation.
He can demand all he wants, but the president doesn't have to do it. Who's this Drumpf character?
He's probably thinking like a judge and trusting in the rule of law and rules of evidence. In his world, an accuser has to make his/her case and is not automatically believed. He doesn't inhabit the emotion driven world where things are believed just because reasons and stuff, so to him this is so preposterous that there's no reason to dignify it with the FBI, and stuff.
Its not silly to ask how someone would gather finger print and DNA evidence if they dont have some professional investigators gathering them.What are you talking about? Polish said to get finger prints and DNA for evidence. How do you do that if no one investigates the accusations?In order to get finger prints and DNA wouldnt someone have to start an investigation?How do you provide evidence someone grabbed your ass or your breasts?
Two ways, besides witnesses.
Fingerprints can be lifted and compared to those of the accused.
Second, when you touch something, you leave some of your DNA behind.
What if you have on gloves?
Damn, what if you weren't there? Children play the games you and your commies are trying to play, grow the fuck up.
.
Yep and you come back with a silly "what if", the broad can't even tell them where to look for any evidence.
.
If that was true then millions of people wouldnt think Kav was a rapist right?No I am not "mixed up" yet you are getting deeper into the word game chaos. It does not need to be a court of law. in a sense, all kinds of irrational wingnuts are siding with someone who is making an accusation. all innocent people remain innocent until proven guilty even in the public square.
Nope. Before these multiple accusations came forth I just thought he was one of the few clean repubs.Or he is thinking like a rapist that understands if the FBI doesnt gather evidence he will skate and be appointed regardless of what cloud hangs over his name.I know he can demand all he wants. Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.Kav can definitely demand that Drumpf order the FBI to investigate. He is Drumpfs nominee.
He can demand all he wants, but the president doesn't have to do it. Who's this Drumpf character?
He's probably thinking like a judge and trusting in the rule of law and rules of evidence. In his world, an accuser has to make his/her case and is not automatically believed. He doesn't inhabit the emotion driven world where things are believed just because reasons and stuff, so to him this is so preposterous that there's no reason to dignify it with the FBI, and stuff.
You will imagine such a cloud no matter what clears him.
No I am not "mixed up" yet you are getting deeper into the word game chaos. It does not need to be a court of law. In a sense, all kinds of irrational wingnuts are siding with someone who is making an accusation. The legal tenet of innocent until proven guilty exists even in the public square.It is revealing that you do not understand the basic tenet of law that the "defendant" is innocent until proven guilty.Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.
I think he is a rapist because most rapists attempt it more than once. No wonder 2 more women have accused him.No his name is not clear. I'm not the only person that thinks he is a rapist.His name is clear. The FBI background check was clear. Senator McConnell just railed against the false claims against the most qualified USSc nominee ever. McConnell will put Kavanaugh on the USSC.
Why would you think that, there has been no allegation of rape. You're just another dishonest hack that believes the ends justifies the means no need for facts. FU
.
Youre getting angry I am exposing your faulty logic. Run along and purchase a better argument.I think he is a rapist because most rapists attempt it more than once. No wonder 2 more women have accused him.No his name is not clear. I'm not the only person that thinks he is a rapist.His name is clear. The FBI background check was clear. Senator McConnell just railed against the false claims against the most qualified USSc nominee ever. McConnell will put Kavanaugh on the USSC.
Why would you think that, there has been no allegation of rape. You're just another dishonest hack that believes the ends justifies the means no need for facts. FU
.
Yep, thanks for proving your stupidity, equating an alleged quick flash to alleged sexual assault just proves how disingenuous you are. No need to reply, I'm done with you punk.
.
The left has a whole line of Kavanaugh accusers waiting to be revealed one by one. An FBI investigation into the Ford case might clear him on that, but other false accusations are waiting in the wings. Finding people to lie is pretty easy, so far, for example, Ms. Ford hasn't said anything under oath.
Time to just move ahead to a vote on Kavanaugh.
You know he tried to do this how?
Simple. He hasnt stood up and demanded an FBI investigation to clear his name. Obviously he is hiding something.
First of all he has no ability to do this and the FBI has already stated they would not.
Second if anyone is falsely accused of anything it is not on them to clear it. It is on the accuser to prove it.
How has the accuser proven it?
Do you have a link to the FBI statement you're referring to?
Now you want to deny that the FBI has declined to investigate?
I am questioning the veracity of the claim. This would be a background investigation not a criminal investigation. It has to be ordered by the white house. The FBI, as history has proven, would not refuse.
Yeah there are repercussions for liars. You can sue them just like Roy Moore and Drumpf said they were going to do but flaked out on taking them to court.The left has a whole line of Kavanaugh accusers waiting to be revealed one by one. An FBI investigation into the Ford case might clear him on that, but other false accusations are waiting in the wings. Finding people to lie is pretty easy, so far, for example, Ms. Ford hasn't said anything under oath.
Time to just move ahead to a vote on Kavanaugh.
That's because there's no repercussion for the liars, that needs to change NOW! That would include the lying assed senators.
.
Or he is thinking like a rapist that understands if the FBI doesnt gather evidence he will skate and be appointed regardless of what cloud hangs over his name.I know he can demand all he wants. Its revealing that he is not demanding an investigation to clear his name.Kav can definitely demand that Drumpf order the FBI to investigate. He is Drumpfs nominee.
He can demand all he wants, but the president doesn't have to do it. Who's this Drumpf character?
He's probably thinking like a judge and trusting in the rule of law and rules of evidence. In his world, an accuser has to make his/her case and is not automatically believed. He doesn't inhabit the emotion driven world where things are believed just because reasons and stuff, so to him this is so preposterous that there's no reason to dignify it with the FBI, and stuff.
You will imagine such a cloud no matter what clears him.