koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,025
"The move is a reversal of ex-President Barack Obama's policy to reduce jail time for low-level drug crimes.
It means we are going to meet our responsibility to enforce the law with judgment and fairness," Mr Sessions said on Friday. "It is simply the right and moral thing to do."
Mr Sessions' predecessor, Eric Holder, had instructed prosecutors in 2013 to avoid pursuing the maximum punishment for criminals in cases such as minor drug offences, which would have triggered mandatory minimum sentencing.
The 2013 policy also encouraged prosecutors to omit details about drug quantities in cases of non-violent offenders with no previous charges or ties to gangs or cartels to avoid harsher punishments.
Mandatory minimum sentences laws, which were passed in the 1980s and 1990s as part of the US "war on drugs", prevent judges from applying discretion when sentencing certain drug offences and are instead determined by the quantity of drugs involved in the crime.
Mr Obama had sought to ease mandatory minimum sentences to reduce jail time for low-level drug crimes and help relieve overcrowded prisons in the US as part of criminal justice reform."
US law boss Sessions orders harsher criminal sentencing - BBC News
"The United States has less than 5 percent of the world's population. But it has almost a quarter of the world's prisoners.
Americans are locked up for crimes — from writing bad checks to using drugs — that would rarely produce prison sentences in other countries. And in particular they are kept incarcerated far longer than prisoners in other nations.
Criminologists and legal scholars in other industrialized nations say they are mystified and appalled by the number and length of American prison sentences.
The United States has, for instance, 2.3 million criminals behind bars,
China, which is four times more populous than the United States, is a distant second, with 1.6 million people in prison
If you count only adults, one in 100 Americans is locked up
The only other major industrialized nation that even comes close is Russia, with 627 prisoners for every 100,000 people.
The others have much lower rates. England's rate is 151; Germany's is 88; and Japan's is 63.
(The median among all nations is about 125, roughly a sixth of the American rate)
Criminologists and legal experts here and abroad point to a tangle of factors to explain America's extraordinary incarceration rate: higher levels of violent crime, harsher sentencing laws, a legacy of racial turmoil, a special fervor in combating illegal drugs, the American temperament, and the lack of a social safety net. Even democracy plays a role, as judges — many of whom are elected, another American anomaly — yield to populist demands for tough justice.
Whatever the reason, the gap between American justice and that of the rest of the world is enormous and growing.
The spike in American incarceration rates is quite recent. From 1925 to 1975, the rate remained stable, around 110 people in prison per 100,000 people. It shot up with the movement to get tough on crime in the late 1970s.
People who commit nonviolent crimes in the rest of the world are less likely to receive prison time and certainly less likely to receive long sentences. The United States is, for instance, the only advanced country that incarcerates people for minor property crimes like passing bad checks, Whitman wrote.
In 1980, there were about 40,000 people in American jails and prisons for drug crimes. These days, there are almost 500,000.
"The U.S. pursues the war on drugs with an ignorant fanaticism," said Stern of King's College.
Still, it is the length of sentences that truly distinguishes American prison policy.
Burglars in the United States serve an average of 16 months in prison, according to Mauer, compared with 5 months in Canada and 7 months in England."
U.S. prison population dwarfs that of other nations
Jails & Prisons are for violent people that are a threat to others. It's a total waste of Federal & State Taxpayer dollars to put non-violent people--prostitutes--drug users--marijuana smokers in jail.
Sessions is a stupid as the Ass Clown that is in the Oval office. Furthermore Sessions is a racist and doesn't even understand what sexual assault is.
"After the Washington Post published a 2005 tape showing Trump bragging about grabbing women’s crotches without permission, Sessions, a prominent Trump surrogate throughout the campaign, came to the Republican’s defense, according to the conservative magazine the Weekly Standard. (His office did not return the Post's requests for comment.) "This was very improper language, and he's acknowledged that," Sessions said last month in St. Louis, according to the magazine.
The reporter pressed him. "But beyond the language, would you characterize the behavior described in that as sexual assault if that behavior actually took place?"
"I don't characterize that as sexual assault,” Session replied.
"So if you grab a woman by the genitals,” the reporter said, “that's not sexual assault?"
"I don't know. It's not clear that he — how that would occur," Sessions said."
It’s not clear if Jeff Sessions thinks grabbing a woman by the crotch is sexual assault
Sessions was DENIED by the Senate as a Federal District Court judge during the Bush 1 administration over his many racist comments.
That time the Senate denied Jeff Sessions a federal judgeship over accusations of racism
To add insult to injury---Sessions had to recuse himself from this Russian investigation because he lied to congress under oath. Now many state--well it's because he mis understood the question, but he also filled out a questionaire prior to the confirmation hearing and checked a box that he had no contact with any Russians. Democrats asked Sessions to come back in to testify and Sessions refused.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice
Sessions recuses himself from Russia investigations - CNNPolitics.com
Then he was in on the firing of Director Comey--when he should have stayed out of it--because he had recused himself from the Russian investigation. So he violated his own recusal to stay out of the Russian investigation.
Did AG Sessions violate his recusal by advising on the decision to fire Comey?
Jeff Sessions has absolutely no business being Attorney General of this country.
Lololol....