Mass wars are possible only thanks to slavery

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,622
138
In countries of the imperialist type, slave mechanisms for the formation of armies remain: forced service and mobilization. In slave empires, there was also selective forced mobilization and service.

All these forms of armies are exclusively slave-owning.

If there was no slave approach to the formation of armies, mass wars would not be possible.

Probably the US is now the only country where there is no form of slave recruitment in the army.
 
In countries of the imperialist type, slave mechanisms for the formation of armies remain: forced service and mobilization. In slave empires, there was also selective forced mobilization and service.

All these forms of armies are exclusively slave-owning.

If there was no slave approach to the formation of armies, mass wars would not be possible.

Probably the US is now the only country where there is no form of slave recruitment in the army.

Once again, you have no clue about the US.

In the US, every male must register for Selective Service within 30 days of their 18th birthday. Selective Service is who runs the draft. There is no need for it now. But at the drop of a hat they could draft men for war.
 
In countries of the imperialist type, slave mechanisms for the formation of armies remain: forced service and mobilization. In slave empires, there was also selective forced mobilization and service.

All these forms of armies are exclusively slave-owning.

If there was no slave approach to the formation of armies, mass wars would not be possible.

Probably the US is now the only country where there is no form of slave recruitment in the army.
Historically wrong. Imperial Rome had a professional volunteer Army.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
After the Marian Reforms the Roman Army became a professional volunteer force. You need to read a real history book.
It was not the Empire, but the time of the crisis of the Republic.
Besides, it's a lie. On the contrary, there was a more slave army than before. They began to recruit, including the landless.
 
Last edited:
It was not the Empire, but the time of the crisis of the Republic.
Besides, it's a lie. On the contrary, there was a more slave army than before. They began to recruit, including the landless.
Those reforms continued during the Empire and there is no such thing as recruiting slaves. Before the reforms only land owners served during wartime if anything they were more like slaves. If war broke out they were expected to fight.

The Roman Army moved from a military that was called up when needed to a voluntary, full time professional force.
 

Forum List

Back
Top