Massachusetts: This Is The Nation’s Toughest Gun Law

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

earn English yourself

Stop using Google Translate. You keep getting it wrong, Sancho.

 

[Papageorgio]

Courts have never ruled, well regulated militia may not infringe the unorganized militia.

So, who can infringe on unorganized militia? That's a 1903 law that does not change the Constitution, no matter how hard you try to fuck up the English language.

Learn English. Let us deal with these issues for now. You are incapable.

It is about resolving any conflict of law. Only the right wing has to make up stories.

You seem to be making up a lot of BS yourself.

 

[danielpalos]

Only well regulated militia may not be infringed, whenever it is about the security of a free State is involved.

Because you express an opinion does not make it a valid opinion.

that is literally, what our Second Amendment declares.

You are incorrect, the courts have ruled your interpretation is wrong and has ruled that way for many decades.

Courts have never ruled, well regulated militia may not infringe the unorganized militia.

Here we go again, you keep citing Heller then twist what the ruling meant. Either learn to communicate your thoughts clearly and concisely or we will continue to have this issue on jumping all over the place. I honestly have no idea what you believe or what you are trying to say. You keep quoting DC vs. Heller and continue to go off on tangents that have nothing to do with the case.

Sorry but if you can’t communicate your thoughts, get a six year old to help you.

it doesn't matter. y'all Only have fallacy, not valid rebuttals. stop whining.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

projecting much. You have nothing but fallacy, I have an argument.

You could have an argument, but you can't speak English, so you can't make an argument.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

It is about resolving any conflict of law. Only the right wing has to make up stories

Conflict of law between states? Do you know what that means? Has nothing to do with Con Law.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

it doesn't matter. y'all Only have fallacy, not valid rebuttals. stop whining.

It is hard to rebut nonsense.

 

[Pop23]

Because you express an opinion does not make it a valid opinion.

that is literally, what our Second Amendment declares.

You are incorrect, the courts have ruled your interpretation is wrong and has ruled that way for many decades.

Courts have never ruled, well regulated militia may not infringe the unorganized militia.

Here we go again, you keep citing Heller then twist what the ruling meant. Either learn to communicate your thoughts clearly and concisely or we will continue to have this issue on jumping all over the place. I honestly have no idea what you believe or what you are trying to say. You keep quoting DC vs. Heller and continue to go off on tangents that have nothing to do with the case.

Sorry but if you can’t communicate your thoughts, get a six year old to help you.

it doesn't matter. y'all Only have fallacy, not valid rebuttals. stop whining.

The "i" in "It" should be capitalized as it is at the beginning of the sentence. There is no reason for a capital "O" in only. Capital "S" in "Stop".

You flunked this test as well as the argument.

English ain't all that tough if you try. Get those Cuban handlers to check the work before posting.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I will tell you what, Sancho.

Why don't you type in Spanish what you think the 2nd says word-for-word, and I will run it through Google Translate, and see if it comes out correctly.

Deal?

 

[danielpalos]

Both, the People and the Militia are plural.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Both, the People and the Militia are plural.

No. I said type it in Spanish and I will run it through Google Translate.

 

[danielpalos]

Both, the People and the Militia are plural.

No. I said type it in Spanish and I will run it through Google Translate.

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies.

 

[Papageorgio]

Because you express an opinion does not make it a valid opinion.

that is literally, what our Second Amendment declares.

You are incorrect, the courts have ruled your interpretation is wrong and has ruled that way for many decades.

Courts have never ruled, well regulated militia may not infringe the unorganized militia.

Here we go again, you keep citing Heller then twist what the ruling meant. Either learn to communicate your thoughts clearly and concisely or we will continue to have this issue on jumping all over the place. I honestly have no idea what you believe or what you are trying to say. You keep quoting DC vs. Heller and continue to go off on tangents that have nothing to do with the case.

Sorry but if you can’t communicate your thoughts, get a six year old to help you.

it doesn't matter. y'all Only have fallacy, not valid rebuttals. stop whining.

I’m not whining at all, the Supreme Court has ruled the way I have interpreted the constitution for over 200 years. They struck down DC in the Heller case and the laws in DC had to conform to the Constitution.

You on the other hand cannot even communicate your simple ideas or expound on them. Then you go off topic to try to prove your point, you are a waste of time. The 2nd Amendment rules and it allows us to own firearms for whatever reason we chose. Thanks for playing.

 

[Papageorgio]

means nothing. Our federal Constitution is Express, not Implied.

Yet, you continue to imply.

projecting much. You have nothing but fallacy, I have an argument.

You have absolutely nothing. You can’t seem to communicate with anyone.

 

[danielpalos]

that is literally, what our Second Amendment declares.

You are incorrect, the courts have ruled your interpretation is wrong and has ruled that way for many decades.

Courts have never ruled, well regulated militia may not infringe the unorganized militia.

Here we go again, you keep citing Heller then twist what the ruling meant. Either learn to communicate your thoughts clearly and concisely or we will continue to have this issue on jumping all over the place. I honestly have no idea what you believe or what you are trying to say. You keep quoting DC vs. Heller and continue to go off on tangents that have nothing to do with the case.

Sorry but if you can’t communicate your thoughts, get a six year old to help you.

it doesn't matter. y'all Only have fallacy, not valid rebuttals. stop whining.

I’m not whining at all, the Supreme Court has ruled the way I have interpreted the constitution for over 200 years. They struck down DC in the Heller case and the laws in DC had to conform to the Constitution.

You on the other hand cannot even communicate your simple ideas or expound on them. Then you go off topic to try to prove your point, you are a waste of time. The 2nd Amendment rules and it allows us to own firearms for whatever reason we chose. Thanks for playing.

No, they haven't.

 

[danielpalos]

means nothing. Our federal Constitution is Express, not Implied.

Yet, you continue to imply.

projecting much. You have nothing but fallacy, I have an argument.

You have absolutely nothing. You can’t seem to communicate with anyone.

i guess i don't need to; i don't have to resort to fallacy, either.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies.

Spanish is generally not cosidered English.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

No, they haven't.

No comprende.

 

[danielpalos]

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies.

Spanish is generally not cosidered English.

fallacies are errors in reasoning. telling stories, is said to make up for it.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

i guess i don't need to; i don't have to resort to fallacy, either.

AKA you surrender. We accept.

 

[danielpalos]

10USC246 is federal law, right wingers. Don't be more critical of less fortunate illegals.