- Jun 21, 2020
- 31,977
- 16,404
- Thread starter
- #321
Insects on the arc lolTell me when you studied Torah and then decided to reject it.Noah could not have existed, the Ark could not have existed, Shem could not have existed, etc.Which has what to do with what I posted?Anti-Semetic is anti-Descendants of Shem, who was the progenitor of Avraham.wrong again-----the LINGUISTIC group called SEMITIC goes all the way back to aLow-IQ Grammar Leads to Such Silly and Irrelevant ObjectionsEchoes of a Prehistoric HorrorWhat's wrong with nationalism; oh, I forgot, you want no borders.You're not the first person today I have asked to elaborate on this Nazi meme and none has responded...Historically everyone has hated Jews ....................
Yes, given enough time that is true.
In this current case it's not all jews, it's the Zionist evil that's hated. It will be a shame the good ones will suffer the smackdown that is coming. The Nazis made the same mistake.
Tell us exactly what "Zionists" do what the Nazis did.
Nationalism, racism, confiscation of property and killing indiscriminately.
Police have a habit of confiscation buildings where bombs are being made.
Have I told you already how full of shit you are?
Anti-Semites are jealous, bitter, and vindictive losers. They come from intellectually and morally inferior groups, mutated with Neanderthal genes. They howl out, knowing that the Survival of the Fittest will eventually make them extinct. Their destiny is dust.
Arabs are Semites....
Typical petty and ignorant nit-picking from a know-it-all nobody. The way the language is being used, "Anti-Semite" = Anti-Jewish and has nothing to do with the actual Semitic races. Besides, I doubt if the Jews are related to them at all; they are so different from those useless psychotic retards. Therefore, if historians were logical, they would have to conclude that the original Hebrews had the desert apes' language forced on them during captivity.
Wrong.
The word "Semitic" means "of an Arab language group", and language is the easiest way to trace genes.
Semitic then actually implies Arab.
Arabs then are the base meaning of the word "Semitic".
And Hebrew only are Semitic because they were Arabs.
Arabs are the larger group as a whole, of which the Hebrew were just one small branch, no different than the Amorites, Chaldeans, Urites, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, Chaldeans, or any other other Semitic people of Arab origins.
So then when someone refers to anti-Jewish sentiment as being anti-Semitic, that is racist cultural appropriations.
It really means anti-Arab.
Which then obviously can't be used towards Arabs.
Arabs can't ever be called anti-Semitic once you realize that Semitic means Arab.
protolanguage-----AMHARIC << not arabic. The TERM antisemitic does refer to
hatred of Jews------it is the way LANGUAGES EVOLVE
The proto-language of Aramaic IS Arab.
It is not Arabic, because Arabic is a later language.
But Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew, Phoenician, etc., are all Semitic Arab languages.
Hebrew are a small branch of Arabs.
Hebrew is an Arab language.
Anti-Semitic can't mean anti-Jewish because the Jewish group and culture is a small subset of the larger Arab group and culture, and it would the lead to the contradition of implying Arab hated Arabs if you allowed the false claim that anti-Semitic meant anti-Jewish to prevail or continue.
It is totally ignorant, illogical, and contradictory.
There are lot of mistakes in language, but educated and intelligent people to not perpetuate them.
You must take the Bible stories literally.
Abraham was the father of Ishmael by Hagar the Egyptian and Isaac who was concieved by Sarah while they were in Egypt and 6 sons by his Arab wife Keturah.
Shem and Yefes settled in Israel after exiting the ark and Cham went to Egypt and Gaza.
By the time Avraham arrived in Israel, Cham descendants had conquered Israel.
In fact, Avraham's ancestors were kicked out of Israel and that's why Terach lived East of Israel.
I know geography and history aren't the most exciting subjects, but perhaps you should study them in depth and context before trying to come off like a Harvard professor.
The point is that clearly the Bible can't be taken literally.
Noah could not have existed, the Ark could not have existed, Shem could not have existed, etc.
Israel was not created until around 1000 BC when the Hebrew invaded the Land of Canaan.
The Hebrew did not come from the Levant, but most likely were nomads in the Sinai.
Prove it.
So far you've proven you've never studied the Torah.
What is to study?
The Torah is made up propaganda, since the Hebrew illiterate and never wrote anything down.
The closes thing science can find to a "great flood" is that the Black Sea was once a dry valley below the level of the Mediterranean.
But it was likey a very slow flood and you can't build an ark large enough to carry any significant portion of even insect life.
Face it, you were mentally and physically abused.
You just said it yourself.
The Torah include Noah and the Ark, which obviously is scientifically impossible.
You could not even get all the insect into an ark.
It’s just allegory