- Banned
- #1,381
That is a good thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is a good thing.
... anti-gun extremists ...
You must really feel sexually inadequate
Well, you claimed its because he's not an anti-gun nut.....don't know.
The Nazis in Germany had been an extremist right wing movement - not a left wing movement. Seems to me you like to rewrite history.
God likes to speak with you! Now! Immediatelly! Do not hesitate to do so.
Ever heard: "Whoever takes up the sword will perish by the sword."?
PS: How funny would be the life in the 21st century all over the world today if people still would go with a sword in the streets? And a sword needs much more knowledge to use it than needs a gun. A drunken sword fighter is more helpless and not very dangerous. A drunken man with a gun is able to be extremely dangerous.
These Leftest nitwits don't want the people to be empowered to resist oppression because they like the oppression of the state.At one time guns did not exist.....and what was that world like, you doofus?
The strong enslaved, raped, tortured, murdered, mutilated the weak.....it was only with the invention of guns that normal people could fight and resist the violent monsters roaming the world, and they created civilization....
M'kay.
So?
Well, as your opinion doesn't matter, neither does point you though your picture made.if you need one of them for defense, that makes you a bad marksman; & forget about hunting.
Lie.
Dipshit the leftists of today act more like nazis they want to rewrite history.
Should it be required by state law's across this country, to not sell alcohol to those who have a responsibility (while they are with their permits to carry, along with their weapons of choice), to then have to show those concealed carry permits if they have one, before purchasing certain drink's that scrambles the brain ???In some places, it's legally required by state law to prohibit guns if a business serves alcohol. (Which the bowling alley did.)
The gun free zone was definitely a problem, along with the fact that the guy was CRAZY in which you are right about.The problem wasn’t the gun, the gun free zone, the number of bullets. The problem was this guy was bat shit crazy and he should have been institutionalized and his guns taken away. That didn’t happen. The human is always the problem. They literally had months to stop this guy but didn’t bother. Now people are dead. Again let’s see what Maine does now.
So...have anything more than a blatantly-partisan site making an unsourced claim (along with several other unsourced-and likely incorrect-claims) for that? I have also seen claims that Paddock was at one of the anti-Trump protests in Reno.Nope.
![]()
Did the FBI Downplay the Far-Right Politics of Las Vegas Shooter Stephen Paddock?
After Paddock killed 58 people in 2017, the FBI said he had no political motives. The evidence demands a second look.theintercept.com
Paddock appeared fixated on three pillars of right-wing extremism: anti-government conspiracy theories, threats to Second Amendment rights, and overly burdensome taxes. For instance, one witness told Las Vegas police that Paddock was “kind of fanatical” about his anti-government conspiracies and that he believed someone had to “wake up the American public” and get them to arm themselves in response to looming threats. Family members and associates of Paddock painted a picture of a man who loathed restrictions on gun ownership and believed that the Second Amendment was under siege, according to our review of their statements to investigators after the shooting and other documents compiled by the authorities.