Matt Gaetz gets schooled on Critical Race Theory

[bodecea]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Breakdown on how this con-versation is going:

Cultist: I hate "X"!

Non-Cultist: What is it about "X" you don't like?

Cultist: It is "Y"!

Non-Cultist: Can you give examples for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of person attacks)

Non-Cultist: Do you know what "Y" means? Can you define it for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of deflections/off-topics)

Non-Cultist: So, you can't give examples of the parts of "X" you don't like and you can't define "Y"!

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!!!

Do you ever add anything of value to any debate?....

(sprinklings of person attacks)

You don't ever say anything....you just puke out nonsense....

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

You are getting more than a sprinkle tard...

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Noticing you have con-tributed nothing to the discussion on CRT or Marxism ("X" and "Y")

When I say something on an issue there is nothing left to be said....

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!

I think you just declared defeat.

 

[bodecea]

Breakdown on how this con-versation is going:

Cultist: I hate "X"!

Non-Cultist: What is it about "X" you don't like?

Cultist: It is "Y"!

Non-Cultist: Can you give examples for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of person attacks)

Non-Cultist: Do you know what "Y" means? Can you define it for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of deflections/off-topics)

Non-Cultist: So, you can't give examples of the parts of "X" you don't like and you can't define "Y"!

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!!!

Do you ever add anything of value to any debate?....

(sprinklings of person attacks)

You don't ever say anything....you just puke out nonsense....

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

You are getting more than a sprinkle tard...

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Noticing you have con-tributed nothing to the discussion on CRT or Marxism ("X" and "Y")

Neither have you.

So...asking you to actually show us what you object to in CRT or showing us that you know what Marxism is is too awkward for you? Sorry that I've painted you in a corner like that. But in adult con-versations, people actually are able to demonstrate that they know what they are talking about. AWKWARD.

 

[bodecea]

Can you give us some examples of how that has been done and to whom?

I already told you

They are passed over for promotion

And no I dont have any names to offer at this time

How do you know why people are passed over for promotion? Are you privy to their FitReps and what they say? Do you even know what a FitRep looks like? I had FitReps my whole career. How many have YOU seen and what is in them?

Dont try to “buy” the pot by pretending to be privy to high level inside knowledge you dont have

If the chain of command wants you out they will find a way to do it

And right now the military wants as few whites as they can get away with

"If the chain of command wants you out they will find a way to do it."

And your job is to prove that they are doing that very thing you claim they are doing. Provide us with the evidence, please.

 

[bodecea]

How so? Give us the (your) definition of Marxism and how it is the textbook of communism.

Better yet I’ll give you the textbook itself

Karl Marx and the Communist Manifesto

https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf

Well, that's fun....throw a whole book at someone. When did you read it? Point out the specific definition of Marxism you got from your reading of that book.

I have never read the whole book from cover to cover

Not many people have

Marx was an anti capitalist and he advocated a collective society where everyone received equal shares of the wealth

This was to be accomplished in two stages

First by socialism where the motto is “from each according to their ability, to each according to need”

And some private ownership is allowed

Socialism is only the stepping stone to communism where there no private ownership at all

Feel free to copy this and use it yourself in the future

If you have never read the book cover to cover, how do you know that it says what you want to pretend it says? Maybe you can pluck out a quote or two to help us out here.

 

[bodecea]

How so? Give us the (your) definition of Marxism and how it is the textbook of communism.

Better yet I’ll give you the textbook itself

Karl Marx and the Communist Manifesto

https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf

Well, that's fun....throw a whole book at someone. When did you read it? Point out the specific definition of Marxism you got from your reading of that book.

I have never read the whole book from cover to cover

Not many people have

Marx was an anti capitalist and he advocated a collective society where everyone received equal shares of the wealth

This was to be accomplished in two stages

First by socialism where the motto is “from each according to their ability, to each according to need”

And some private ownership is allowed

Socialism is only the stepping stone to communism where there no private ownership at all

Feel free to copy this and use it yourself in the future

And it turns out that Marx was fucking wrong about the direction of his collectivist theory. Communism leads to Socialism, not the reverse. A stateless collective cannot last more than a few days.

Marxism-Leninism is more in line with what you think of as Communism. No country ever followed pure Marxism as Marx laid it out..........it was more of a philosophy.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.

But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.

You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're too gutless to admit it.

 

[bodecea]

Marxisms definition is about "property taken from some and given to others"? You sure about that?

See post 197

That's not Marxism.......you are thinking more Communism. Hint, they are not the same.

 

[bodecea]

Breakdown on how this con-versation is going:

Cultist: I hate "X"!

Non-Cultist: What is it about "X" you don't like?

Cultist: It is "Y"!

Non-Cultist: Can you give examples for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of person attacks)

Non-Cultist: Do you know what "Y" means? Can you define it for us?

Cultist: You are a "Yist"! (sprinklings of deflections/off-topics)

Non-Cultist: So, you can't give examples of the parts of "X" you don't like and you can't define "Y"!

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!!!

Do you ever add anything of value to any debate?....

(sprinklings of person attacks)

You don't ever say anything....you just puke out nonsense....

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

You are getting more than a sprinkle tard...

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Noticing you have con-tributed nothing to the discussion on CRT or Marxism ("X" and "Y")

When I say something on an issue there is nothing left to be said....

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!

I think you just declared defeat.

Cultist: I DECLARE VICTORY!!!!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

How so? Give us the (your) definition of Marxism and how it is the textbook of communism.

Better yet I’ll give you the textbook itself

Karl Marx and the Communist Manifesto

https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf

Well, that's fun....throw a whole book at someone. When did you read it? Point out the specific definition of Marxism you got from your reading of that book.

I have never read the whole book from cover to cover

Not many people have

Marx was an anti capitalist and he advocated a collective society where everyone received equal shares of the wealth

This was to be accomplished in two stages

First by socialism where the motto is “from each according to their ability, to each according to need”

And some private ownership is allowed

Socialism is only the stepping stone to communism where there no private ownership at all

Feel free to copy this and use it yourself in the future

And it turns out that Marx was fucking wrong about the direction of his collectivist theory. Communism leads to Socialism, not the reverse. A stateless collective cannot last more than a few days.

Marxism-Leninism is more in line with what you think of as Communism. No country ever followed pure Marxism as Marx laid it out..........it was more of a philosophy.

Because it's impossible. It does not EVER EVER EVER work. Leninism is SOCIALISM, but this proves to me that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

 

[bodecea]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.

But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.

You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're to gutless to admit it.

No, it has not been proven to be complete bullshit. But you are certainly welcome to link to some kind of proof that it was bullshit for us to all look over. Prove your point there.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Marxisms definition is about "property taken from some and given to others"? You sure about that?

See post 197

That's not Marxism.......you are thinking more Communism. Hint, they are not the same.

THEN TELL US THE DIFFERECE, ASS WIPE!!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.

But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.

You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're to gutless to admit it.

No, it has not been proven to be complete bullshit. But you are certainly welcome to link to some kind of proof that it was bullshit for us to all look over. Prove your point there.

I don't have to prove it true or false, because I ASSUMED it to be true. DID YOU MISS THE REST OF MY POST??

 

[bodecea]

How so? Give us the (your) definition of Marxism and how it is the textbook of communism.

Better yet I’ll give you the textbook itself

Karl Marx and the Communist Manifesto

https://www.marxists.org/admin/books/manifesto/Manifesto.pdf

Well, that's fun....throw a whole book at someone. When did you read it? Point out the specific definition of Marxism you got from your reading of that book.

I have never read the whole book from cover to cover

Not many people have

Marx was an anti capitalist and he advocated a collective society where everyone received equal shares of the wealth

This was to be accomplished in two stages

First by socialism where the motto is “from each according to their ability, to each according to need”

And some private ownership is allowed

Socialism is only the stepping stone to communism where there no private ownership at all

Feel free to copy this and use it yourself in the future

And it turns out that Marx was fucking wrong about the direction of his collectivist theory. Communism leads to Socialism, not the reverse. A stateless collective cannot last more than a few days.

Marxism-Leninism is more in line with what you think of as Communism. No country ever followed pure Marxism as Marx laid it out..........it was more of a philosophy.

Because it's impossible. It does not EVER EVER EVER work. Leninism is SOCIALISM, but this proves to me that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

I will not disagree with you there....most pure philosophies don't work in real life. Most successful countries: 1) never stay successful in one form forever, and 2) are hybrids of more than one kind of political philosophy.

But Leninism is Communism, not socialism.

 

[bodecea]

Marxisms definition is about "property taken from some and given to others"? You sure about that?

See post 197

That's not Marxism.......you are thinking more Communism. Hint, they are not the same.

THEN TELL US THE DIFFERECE, ASS WIPE!!

You are the one throwing the words "Marxism" and "Communism" around......don't you know? Why are you using words you have NO CLUE what they mean?

 

[bodecea]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.

But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.

You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're to gutless to admit it.

No, it has not been proven to be complete bullshit. But you are certainly welcome to link to some kind of proof that it was bullshit for us to all look over. Prove your point there.

I don't have to prove it true or false, because I ASSUMED it to be true. DID YOU MISS THE REST OF MY POST??

"because I ASSUMED it to be true".....................well there you have it. Building your beliefs on quicksand. Prove that that story is complete bullshit. You claim it is.............surely you have some facts to base that on?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

But Leninism is Communism, not socialism.

Then, why did the Soviet State own the means of production?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to

I will:

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.

What could they possibly mean?


What could possibly be the goal here?

You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.

In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.

You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?


I see your problem here.

I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.

I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.

What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.

(sprinklings of personal attacks)

Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.

Different racial outcomes......why?

(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)

We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.

That's a different issue.

I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.

Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?

Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.

That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.

But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.

You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're to gutless to admit it.

No, it has not been proven to be complete bullshit. But you are certainly welcome to link to some kind of proof that it was bullshit for us to all look over. Prove your point there.

I don't have to prove it true or false, because I ASSUMED it to be true. DID YOU MISS THE REST OF MY POST??

"because I ASSUMED it to be true".....................well there you have it. Building your beliefs on quicksand. Prove that that story is complete bullshit. You claim it is.............surely you have some facts to base that on?

Because it doesn't fucking matter. You have never heard "for argument's sake" in your life.

You want to sit here and quibble about the actual story and not the real issues, because you are incapable of discussing the real issues. You are the quintessential pettifogger.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I will go ahead and sum this up for everyone.

Disparate economic conditions will be remedied by property confiscation and redistribution. CRT is Marxist/Socialist/Communist -- all the same fucking thing.

 

[bodecea]

But Leninism is Communism, not socialism.

Then, why did the Soviet State own the means of production?

Communism, hun. Like I said, it was Communism..........as totalitarianism....like in Animal Farm, some more equal than others.