bodecea
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2009
- 185,066
- 66,558
Wait....the truth "doesn't fucking matter" to you? Well, I can see that. I see your problem now. You've hitched your wagon to a cult where the truth "doesn't fucking matter".Because it doesn't fucking matter. You have never heard "for argument's sake" in your life.I don't have to prove it true or false, because I ASSUMED it to be true. DID YOU MISS THE REST OF MY POST??No, it has not been proven to be complete bullshit. But you are certainly welcome to link to some kind of proof that it was bullshit for us to all look over. Prove your point there.That has proven to be complete BULLSHIT and you know it.Think redlining. Think this story times thousands if not millions: Black Homeowner's Appraisal Doubled After a White Friend Stood in for Her.That's a different issue.We see different racial outcomes all the time....are you denying that that happens? Let's look at the cases of George Floyd and Dylann Roof for simple example of Disparate racial outcomes.Different racial outcomes......why?(sprinklings of personal attacks)In other words.....racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex things, changing things, subtle things.I will:1) give an example of something from CRT that you object to
CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.
What could they possibly mean?
What could possibly be the goal here?
You forget that I got into grad school off of grades I "earned" by writing like my name was Chairman Mao.
You think racism is simple and can be explained away as individual responsibilities?
I see your problem here.![]()
I know you don't get it. That's why you have been conned so easily.
I'll slow down for your uneducated ass.
What does "disparate racial outcomes" mean to you? Let's start there.
Disparate racial outcomes....different racial outcomes.
(here is where you blow it) <----(is that "sprinkling in personal attacks"?)
I am focusing on different financial or economic outcomes.
Should I not be? Or is it that you should be?
But, again even if that were true (it's not), that is a different issue, or a mere symptom of the underlying "disparate" impact.
You're not getting out of this. You know damn well how the proponents of CRT intend to "right" all these "wrongs" and you're to gutless to admit it.
"because I ASSUMED it to be true".....................well there you have it. Building your beliefs on quicksand. Prove that that story is complete bullshit. You claim it is.............surely you have some facts to base that on?
You want to sit here and quibble about the actual story and not the real issues, because you are incapable of discussing the real issues. You are the quintessential pettifogger.
And if you had paid attention, I have been discussing the REAL issues.....part of which is KNOWING what words mean, knowing that parts of CRT you object to. You cannot articulate either what the definition of Marxism is, even tho you call something or someone Marxist, and you cannot articulate what part(s) of CRT you object to clearly even tho you claim you hate it and it's bad.
You see the problem there, right?