Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 24,152
- 15,720
- 1,405
My first thought was ET, good call on your part.Damn, I hope that woman isn't a proctologist.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My first thought was ET, good call on your part.Damn, I hope that woman isn't a proctologist.![]()
Is that not what is happening?Your crazy is showing again.
Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons
The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?
View attachment 661441
As Democrats continue to threaten USSC Justices, call for intimidation and violence against them, and incite assassination attempts against the Justices...
As liberal extremist domestic terrorists continue to attack and bomb churches, family centers, and pro-life group's ...
As Garland refuses to enforce US law to protect the USSC Justices...
Suddenly the USSC 'shoots down' attempted liberal restrictions on Concealed Cary Weapons....
...and Violent leftists suddenly realize that more of the American people they have been threatening, attacking, and bombing could be armed, carrying concealed weapons to protect themselves....
...amazing continuing their lawless, violent tantrums more dangerous.
I opined a year or so ago that the left would not slow down/ stop its assault on Conservatives / others when it does not get its way UNTIL Conservative with a CCP and / or a legal weapon defended themselves from such an attack and ended up shooting some leftist thug or domestic terrorist.
Enter Kyle Rittenhouse. Leftists attacked him, chased him, hit him with a skateboard, and when he felt his life was threatened, that he may lose his life, he shot and killed 1 attacker and wounded another.
Leftists went berserk- how DARE he defend himself?! How could he be allowed to do that?!
Biden, Garland, and the DOJ are setting the proverbial table for it to happen again.
Garland's job is to enforce the rule of law / US law, and he's refusing to do so. He is protecting Vientiane liberals and leftist domestic terrorists who have perpetrated over 2 dozen domestic terrorist bombings.
Instead of making it plain to these criminals this is not tolerated he is facilitating it.
So when the USSC finally gets around to releasing the decision and criminal leftist animals take to the streets to engage in 'mostly peaceful protests', I don't want to hear one damn word from the board Leftists when a legally armed Conservative shoots and kills some leftist thug or domestic terrorist in self-defense or the defense of their business / property.
Lack of law results in vigilanteism / the mandatory need for one to protect themselves....
This is on Garland.
And thanks to the USSC's recent decision, picking the 'right' target (an unarmed one) for violent Leftists just got a little harder.
Justifiably so, police will still yell, "gun, gun, gun". They do not start blasting away unless this is a perceived threat against them.I love the ruling. No longer will cops be able yell "gun, gun, gun" and start blasting away.
Whether Jefferson said it doesn't matter. Crazy right wing gun nuts have said it a lot."Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty." - John Basil Barnhill (anti-socialist author)
If that is what you are referring to I've shied away from it because people always attribute it to Thomas Jefferson when in fact it was not coined till 1914 by Mr. Barnhill.
While it's no less true the fact is Jefferson never said it.
Justifiably so, police will still yell, "gun, gun, gun". They do not start blasting away unless this is a perceived threat against them.
If that's what you want to wear, go for it. You be you.
You be you.
If a Real insurrection happens. You WILL KNOW IT.You never know when you might have to try another insurrection, right?
That's the dumbest expression I've ever heard. It must be a leftie thing.You be you.
You sure don’t. Better be armed before hand. As the 2A allows you to be.You never know when you might have to try another insurrection, right?
well they fundamentally disagree with the ConstitutionLiberals are incredibly intolerant of any opinion that differs from their own. Even when backed up by the U.S. Constitution and common sense.
Yep I agree with you. The government SHOULD fear the people. When a government doesn’t fear its people it becomes a tyranny. Governments only have the rights given to them by the people And as the founders openly said governments that fail to respect the people need to be overthrown.The often stated term is fear. The government should fear the people. Are you trying to pretend you haven't read that hundreds of times here?
it never stops amazing me how far off the mark you are with simple thingsI love the ruling. No longer will cops be able yell "gun, gun, gun" and start blasting away.
The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?
It’s amazing how you lefties react to actual constitutional rulings. Which is what the USSC was designed to do. Not making up new rights to murder your child but to enforce actual rights like bearing arms.The courts are 1/3 of our government. Gun nuts demand access to military style weapons because it is important for our government to be afraid of the people. Your logic demands the Supremes be afraid, doesn't it?