2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,152
- 52,407
- 2,290
Boy these leftists are having a really bad week.
And what really puts the cherry on top....
It is all because of the MAGA King.....President Trump........long may he live.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Boy these leftists are having a really bad week.
And what really puts the cherry on top....
It is all because of the MAGA King.....President Trump........long may he live.......
There were times they were expelled and in many places the observers were kept so far back from the counters “for their os. Protection from Covid” that they couldn't accurately observe anything.No they were not. Republicans were also doing the vote counting.
This is the way the system works. Just because they didn't swing the doors open to anyone and everyone doesn't prove any fraud.
You've had years and have come up with nothing time and again.
No, some of the people in a minority of states wanted segregated school. The only states with segregated schools were ex- Confederate ones.The American people wanted segregated schools.
Zero reading comprehension. ^^^
Quite obviously, you know nothing about security. Election or otherwise.
I'm not going to argue with you, but I'm not going to listen to you either.
There were times they were expelled and in many places the observers were kept so far back from the counters “for their os. Protection from Covid” that they couldn't accurately observe anything.
No, some of the people in a minority of states wanted segregated school. The only states with segregated schools were ex- Confederate ones.
Next thing I'm expecting is packing the court talk.
Well, what you should learn about, is an area of security called "forensics". It includes things like audits.Lol......I know security consists of not simply throwing the doors open and letting anyone and everyone in.
Well, what you should learn about, is an area of security called "forensics". It includes things like audits.
It's more than just what the FBI does when they want to examine someone's cell phone - which is also forensics but it's more along the lines of data recovery
A forensic audit is a big, huge deal. It's very rigorous, people like me get paid huge bucks to conduct them. We must adhere to strict protocol both when acquiring and when examining.
It’s spot on for sure. Your home is chock full of things you have but hope you never need. Same with your car. When I was racing motorcycles I didn’t wait until after a crash to put on all the safety gear. That would be retarded. But for some reason some people can’t grasp the concept a gun is the same as any other safety product.As I was taught in the Army, failing to prepare is preparing to fail. Trite but true. After all, you don't buy insurance after you need it.
It’s spot on for sure. Your home is chock full of things you have but hope you never need. Same with your car. When I was racing motorcycles I didn’t wait until after a crash to put on all the safety gear. That would be retarded. But for some reason some people can’t grasp the concept a gun is the same as any other safety product.
Total bullshit, if a guy draws on a cop he'll most likely get shot.
I noted earlier that it is a good thing that the police now have their hands tied to harass people. Just having a gun or the belief you have a gun is no longer justification to search you. Actually having a gun is no reason to start shooting. Just because you are even standing there holding a gun, the cops have to move on.
"A guy can stand out there — or a girl or whoever with a rifle, an AR-15 or a handgun — and stand there on a sidewalk looking at the school," Goodin told WDRB. "The difference is this: We can't even stop and ask them what they're doing because of this law."
Police say the repeal of Indiana's handgun permit law means someone openly carrying a gun can be on a sidewalk eyeing a school but cops can't legally ask them what they're doing
No more with the excuse "We saw he had a gun".
I hope THOUSANDS of democrat rioters die as a result of this. Rioters should be shot on sight and the shooters should be given $1,000 for each rioter shot.View attachment 661441
As Democrats continue to threaten USSC Justices, call for intimidation and violence against them, and incite assassination attempts against the Justices...
As liberal extremist domestic terrorists continue to attack and bomb churches, family centers, and pro-life group's ...
As Garland refuses to enforce US law to protect the USSC Justices...
Suddenly the USSC 'shoots down' attempted liberal restrictions on Concealed Cary Weapons....
...and Violent leftists suddenly realize that more of the American people they have been threatening, attacking, and bombing could be armed, carrying concealed weapons to protect themselves....
...amazing continuing their lawless, violent tantrums more dangerous.
I opined a year or so ago that the left would not slow down/ stop its assault on Conservatives / others when it does not get its way UNTIL Conservative with a CCP and / or a legal weapon defended themselves from such an attack and ended up shooting some leftist thug or domestic terrorist.
Enter Kyle Rittenhouse. Leftists attacked him, chased him, hit him with a skateboard, and when he felt his life was threatened, that he may lose his life, he shot and killed 1 attacker and wounded another.
Leftists went berserk- how DARE he defend himself?! How could he be allowed to do that?!
Biden, Garland, and the DOJ are setting the proverbial table for it to happen again.
Garland's job is to enforce the rule of law / US law, and he's refusing to do so. He is protecting Vientiane liberals and leftist domestic terrorists who have perpetrated over 2 dozen domestic terrorist bombings.
Instead of making it plain to these criminals this is not tolerated he is facilitating it.
So when the USSC finally gets around to releasing the decision and criminal leftist animals take to the streets to engage in 'mostly peaceful protests', I don't want to hear one damn word from the board Leftists when a legally armed Conservative shoots and kills some leftist thug or domestic terrorist in self-defense or the defense of their business / property.
Lack of law results in vigilanteism / the mandatory need for one to protect themselves....
This is on Garland.
And thanks to the USSC's recent decision, picking the 'right' target (an unarmed one) for violent Leftists just got a little harder.