Medicare for All targets the elderly.

[caddo kid]

There is no natural escape from aging which is why Medicare was enacted in 1966. After age 65 the government provides medical insurance for citizens who without choice got old as well as some who contracted certain end stage diseases. Medicare is like a pond that supports a special population of fish. It’s not perfect but it works reasonably well as long as its ecosystem and population remain balanced-There is danger ahead for the pond.

After the destruction of US healthcare by the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, there have increasing calls to expand Medicare to cover all citizens regardless of age. Imagine what would happen if you had a longstanding backyard pond with 150 fish in it and suddenly someone dumped 100,000 more fish into that pond.

The original fish would quickly succumb to the hordes of new interlopers because they would be the weakest. It is the frail and infirm that are the first to be attacked by socialism because they are the least likely to put up a fight. Medicare for All would be a direct assault on every American over age 65.

They would be cast into the midst of mobs consisting of drug addicts, alcoholics, malingerers, criminals and careless citizens that exercised free will and chose a fate that unlike aging could have been avoided-but they have a vote that can be purchased to empower government by imposing socialism.

Even the most hapless fools among us watched as American politicians cobbled together a special technicality to separate and excuse themselves from the affordable Care Act. History reveals that virtually all socialist examples of government healthcare reserved top notch and quickly accessible medicine for the corrupted elite while rank and file citizens like most of us are herded into the bureaucracy to wait our turn even if we die in line.

As the US strays from a meritocracy to socialist aristocracy, Americans over age 65 are directly in the crosshairs of a runaway government that has singled them out of the herd as easy age-wounded targets. Anyone on Medicare that wants to preserve the pond should vote against Medicare for ALL because it is potential threat to elderly healthcare that could be a permanent dagger to its heart.

Do not let the elites play you for fools. You can’t stop aging but you can fight socialism.

Wow, wjat a crock of shit. Medicarte for now would not affect those currently on Medicare.

What to know what will fuck older Americans? Trump. Trump's plan will skyrocket costs for people over 50, hurt Medicare.

The ACA helped.

Trump's plan? And what is Trump's plan?

Trump has NO plan, period.
The GOP also has NO plan.
Republicans; the party of health care. LOFL .......

 

[Thinker101]

There is no natural escape from aging which is why Medicare was enacted in 1966. After age 65 the government provides medical insurance for citizens who without choice got old as well as some who contracted certain end stage diseases. Medicare is like a pond that supports a special population of fish. It’s not perfect but it works reasonably well as long as its ecosystem and population remain balanced-There is danger ahead for the pond.

After the destruction of US healthcare by the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, there have increasing calls to expand Medicare to cover all citizens regardless of age. Imagine what would happen if you had a longstanding backyard pond with 150 fish in it and suddenly someone dumped 100,000 more fish into that pond.

The original fish would quickly succumb to the hordes of new interlopers because they would be the weakest. It is the frail and infirm that are the first to be attacked by socialism because they are the least likely to put up a fight. Medicare for All would be a direct assault on every American over age 65.

They would be cast into the midst of mobs consisting of drug addicts, alcoholics, malingerers, criminals and careless citizens that exercised free will and chose a fate that unlike aging could have been avoided-but they have a vote that can be purchased to empower government by imposing socialism.

Even the most hapless fools among us watched as American politicians cobbled together a special technicality to separate and excuse themselves from the affordable Care Act. History reveals that virtually all socialist examples of government healthcare reserved top notch and quickly accessible medicine for the corrupted elite while rank and file citizens like most of us are herded into the bureaucracy to wait our turn even if we die in line.

As the US strays from a meritocracy to socialist aristocracy, Americans over age 65 are directly in the crosshairs of a runaway government that has singled them out of the herd as easy age-wounded targets. Anyone on Medicare that wants to preserve the pond should vote against Medicare for ALL because it is potential threat to elderly healthcare that could be a permanent dagger to its heart.

Do not let the elites play you for fools. You can’t stop aging but you can fight socialism.

Wow, wjat a crock of shit. Medicarte for now would not affect those currently on Medicare.

What to know what will fuck older Americans? Trump. Trump's plan will skyrocket costs for people over 50, hurt Medicare.

The ACA helped.

Trump's plan? And what is Trump's plan?

Trump has NO plan, period.
The GOP also has NO plan.
Republicans; the party of health care. LOFL .......

Me personally, I'd rather have NO plan than a crap plan....like Obamacare.

 

[peach174]

Isn't medicare for all over 65 years of age, an example of socialism?

No
It's paid by the individual and employer thru the FICA tax.
Socialism are programs not paid for by the individual receiving it. It's paid by collective tax.

 

[caddo kid]

There is no natural escape from aging which is why Medicare was enacted in 1966. After age 65 the government provides medical insurance for citizens who without choice got old as well as some who contracted certain end stage diseases. Medicare is like a pond that supports a special population of fish. It’s not perfect but it works reasonably well as long as its ecosystem and population remain balanced-There is danger ahead for the pond.

After the destruction of US healthcare by the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, there have increasing calls to expand Medicare to cover all citizens regardless of age. Imagine what would happen if you had a longstanding backyard pond with 150 fish in it and suddenly someone dumped 100,000 more fish into that pond.

The original fish would quickly succumb to the hordes of new interlopers because they would be the weakest. It is the frail and infirm that are the first to be attacked by socialism because they are the least likely to put up a fight. Medicare for All would be a direct assault on every American over age 65.

They would be cast into the midst of mobs consisting of drug addicts, alcoholics, malingerers, criminals and careless citizens that exercised free will and chose a fate that unlike aging could have been avoided-but they have a vote that can be purchased to empower government by imposing socialism.

Even the most hapless fools among us watched as American politicians cobbled together a special technicality to separate and excuse themselves from the affordable Care Act. History reveals that virtually all socialist examples of government healthcare reserved top notch and quickly accessible medicine for the corrupted elite while rank and file citizens like most of us are herded into the bureaucracy to wait our turn even if we die in line.

As the US strays from a meritocracy to socialist aristocracy, Americans over age 65 are directly in the crosshairs of a runaway government that has singled them out of the herd as easy age-wounded targets. Anyone on Medicare that wants to preserve the pond should vote against Medicare for ALL because it is potential threat to elderly healthcare that could be a permanent dagger to its heart.

Do not let the elites play you for fools. You can’t stop aging but you can fight socialism.

Wow, wjat a crock of shit. Medicarte for now would not affect those currently on Medicare.

What to know what will fuck older Americans? Trump. Trump's plan will skyrocket costs for people over 50, hurt Medicare.

The ACA helped.

Trump's plan? And what is Trump's plan?

Trump has NO plan, period.
The GOP also has NO plan.
Republicans; the party of health care. LOFL .......

Me personally, I'd rather have NO plan than a crap plan....like Obamacare.

So, health care in AmeriKKKa is ALL ABOUT YOU then?

Got it.

 

[Thinker101]

There is no natural escape from aging which is why Medicare was enacted in 1966. After age 65 the government provides medical insurance for citizens who without choice got old as well as some who contracted certain end stage diseases. Medicare is like a pond that supports a special population of fish. It’s not perfect but it works reasonably well as long as its ecosystem and population remain balanced-There is danger ahead for the pond.

After the destruction of US healthcare by the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, there have increasing calls to expand Medicare to cover all citizens regardless of age. Imagine what would happen if you had a longstanding backyard pond with 150 fish in it and suddenly someone dumped 100,000 more fish into that pond.

The original fish would quickly succumb to the hordes of new interlopers because they would be the weakest. It is the frail and infirm that are the first to be attacked by socialism because they are the least likely to put up a fight. Medicare for All would be a direct assault on every American over age 65.

They would be cast into the midst of mobs consisting of drug addicts, alcoholics, malingerers, criminals and careless citizens that exercised free will and chose a fate that unlike aging could have been avoided-but they have a vote that can be purchased to empower government by imposing socialism.

Even the most hapless fools among us watched as American politicians cobbled together a special technicality to separate and excuse themselves from the affordable Care Act. History reveals that virtually all socialist examples of government healthcare reserved top notch and quickly accessible medicine for the corrupted elite while rank and file citizens like most of us are herded into the bureaucracy to wait our turn even if we die in line.

As the US strays from a meritocracy to socialist aristocracy, Americans over age 65 are directly in the crosshairs of a runaway government that has singled them out of the herd as easy age-wounded targets. Anyone on Medicare that wants to preserve the pond should vote against Medicare for ALL because it is potential threat to elderly healthcare that could be a permanent dagger to its heart.

Do not let the elites play you for fools. You can’t stop aging but you can fight socialism.

Wow, wjat a crock of shit. Medicarte for now would not affect those currently on Medicare.

What to know what will fuck older Americans? Trump. Trump's plan will skyrocket costs for people over 50, hurt Medicare.

The ACA helped.

Trump's plan? And what is Trump's plan?

Trump has NO plan, period.
The GOP also has NO plan.
Republicans; the party of health care. LOFL .......

Me personally, I'd rather have NO plan than a crap plan....like Obamacare.

So, health care in AmeriKKKa is ALL ABOUT YOU then?

Got it.

If I'm doing the paying, it sure the hell is.

 

[Ray9]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

 

[RealDave]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

 

[RealDave]

There is no natural escape from aging which is why Medicare was enacted in 1966. After age 65 the government provides medical insurance for citizens who without choice got old as well as some who contracted certain end stage diseases. Medicare is like a pond that supports a special population of fish. It’s not perfect but it works reasonably well as long as its ecosystem and population remain balanced-There is danger ahead for the pond.

After the destruction of US healthcare by the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act, there have increasing calls to expand Medicare to cover all citizens regardless of age. Imagine what would happen if you had a longstanding backyard pond with 150 fish in it and suddenly someone dumped 100,000 more fish into that pond.

The original fish would quickly succumb to the hordes of new interlopers because they would be the weakest. It is the frail and infirm that are the first to be attacked by socialism because they are the least likely to put up a fight. Medicare for All would be a direct assault on every American over age 65.

They would be cast into the midst of mobs consisting of drug addicts, alcoholics, malingerers, criminals and careless citizens that exercised free will and chose a fate that unlike aging could have been avoided-but they have a vote that can be purchased to empower government by imposing socialism.

Even the most hapless fools among us watched as American politicians cobbled together a special technicality to separate and excuse themselves from the affordable Care Act. History reveals that virtually all socialist examples of government healthcare reserved top notch and quickly accessible medicine for the corrupted elite while rank and file citizens like most of us are herded into the bureaucracy to wait our turn even if we die in line.

As the US strays from a meritocracy to socialist aristocracy, Americans over age 65 are directly in the crosshairs of a runaway government that has singled them out of the herd as easy age-wounded targets. Anyone on Medicare that wants to preserve the pond should vote against Medicare for ALL because it is potential threat to elderly healthcare that could be a permanent dagger to its heart.

Do not let the elites play you for fools. You can’t stop aging but you can fight socialism.

Wow, wjat a crock of shit. Medicarte for now would not affect those currently on Medicare.

What to know what will fuck older Americans? Trump. Trump's plan will skyrocket costs for people over 50, hurt Medicare.

The ACA helped.

Trump's plan? And what is Trump's plan?

Trump has NO plan, period.
The GOP also has NO plan.
Republicans; the party of health care. LOFL .......

Me personally, I'd rather have NO plan than a crap plan....like Obamacare.

Obsamacare is NOT a health insurance policy

 

[Mac1958]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

 

[RealDave]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

 

[Mac1958]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

 

[debbiedowner]

Since when does socialism involve choice?

You can decline both Medicare Part A and B when you turn 65.

 

[RealDave]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

 

[Mac1958]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Okay, fine.

Full disclosure, I wasn't expecting a straight answer.
.

 

[Moonglow]

I have socialized medical care at the VA..

 

[debbiedowner]

Medicare for All would have to be "imposed" on the people which means they would be disallowed from having private insurance. So old people that paid taxes for their whole lives would be taxed again for government insurance for those who never paid taxes on anything-It's Venezuelan healthcare.

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Medicare today is not single payer, if you do not have a supplement you as the beneficiary are paying your hospitals deductibles and 20% under Part B and if you have supplement or Med Advantage it's still not single payer. What Bernie and Harris are proposing is not Medicare for All it is complete single payer because they do not want insurance companies involved what so ever.

 

[RealDave]

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Medicare today is not single payer, if you do not have a supplement you as the beneficiary are paying your hospitals deductibles and 20% under Part B and if you have supplement or Med Advantage it's still not single payer. What Bernie and Harris are proposing is not Medicare for All it is complete single payer because they do not want insurance companies involved what so ever.

If you have Medicare it is a single payer Just because it does not cover 100% does not change that.

 

[Mac1958]

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Medicare today is not single payer, if you do not have a supplement you as the beneficiary are paying your hospitals deductibles and 20% under Part B and if you have supplement or Med Advantage it's still not single payer. What Bernie and Harris are proposing is not Medicare for All it is complete single payer because they do not want insurance companies involved what so ever.

As you and I have discussed before, the aggressive ignorance on our health system is rampant.
.

 

[RealDave]

You do realize that there is Medicare Advantage plans. Therte are also private supplemental plans.

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Medicare today is not single payer, if you do not have a supplement you as the beneficiary are paying your hospitals deductibles and 20% under Part B and if you have supplement or Med Advantage it's still not single payer. What Bernie and Harris are proposing is not Medicare for All it is complete single payer because they do not want insurance companies involved what so ever.

BTW, you are lying about Sander's plan if you think it does away with private health insurance.

 

[RealDave]

Ah, it appears you've learned a bit since yesterday. Good!

What the Dems (including Sanders) are pushing is real Single Payer. Getting rid of private insurance.

Now that you understand the difference, which way would you go?
.

Medicare as it is now is single payer. We have those auxilliary plans.

So, I'll ask again. Do you want Medicare-for-all as the system now works, or do you want full Single Payer, with no private health insurance?
.

Medfcare is single payer. I keep posting it & you keep being stupid.

Medicare today is not single payer, if you do not have a supplement you as the beneficiary are paying your hospitals deductibles and 20% under Part B and if you have supplement or Med Advantage it's still not single payer. What Bernie and Harris are proposing is not Medicare for All it is complete single payer because they do not want insurance companies involved what so ever.

As you and I have discussed before, the aggressive ignorance on our health system is rampant.
.

On your part.