koshergrl
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2011
- 81,129
- 14,025
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #261
I did. The first sentence that said abortion isn't dangerous is a lie. Abortion is an elective invasive procedure that risks women's lives. To deny it is a lie.When I see a long post and the first sentence is a blatant and ridiculous lie, I don't read the rest. It's a waste. Im not interested in reading lies.Getting an abortion is degrading. It negates the value of women through the ideology that it is acceptable for women to risk their lives in order to protect their figure, to protect their income, to protect their abuser, to protect their pimp... and it denies that their children have any value at all. Additionally, it maintains that women don't deserve having clinics that are held to at least the standard that dental clinics are held to..and that the butchers who are crawling around in their wombs need not be qualified to actually provide them medical care in a real hospital. After all, it's just a woman and her twat...no need to provide any oversight in the abbatoirs where mentally ill men and women climb into their vaginas with sharp instruments.
Your assertions do not hold water. Abortion does not risk the woman's life. In Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt:
Transcript: Oral arguments in Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt
the state of Texas argued that clinics in which abortions were performed warranted extreme safety precautions that it did not require of other medical facilities in which other procedures are performed. The Texas solicitor general got caught short when confronted with the fact that the state did not require the same safeguards for facilities in which colonoscopies are performed, even though the risk from these procedures is recognized by the medical community as greater. He got caught short again when he recommended, when asked about women who could not easily get to "approved" clinics, that they go to New Mexico, which does not require the same "safeguards." He came to court unable to produce anything to back up the state's claims.
It's interesting that both the American Medical Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, as well as other organizations, have rejected the state's medical contentions. No one knows the source of these contentions.
Amicus Briefs in Support of Whole Woman’s Health
Some years ago, I had a D&C for reasons unrelated to pregnancy. It's an out-patient procedure, not some life-threatening, hold-your-breath procedure.
You remind me of a guy on another message board who asserted that there were all of these filthy horrible clinics where abortions were performed. I asked him what states these clinics were in and whether they had been reported to the proper authorities. I never got an answer. You would think that someone would have reported them. He could have answered me, since he was so sure. I concluded that he was full of shit.
Where you get the idea that making the decision to have an abortion involves protecting one's figure, one's income, one's abuser, or one's pimp is beyond me. Most are just normal people.
Point to a lie. There is nothing in what I wrote that is not true. This really happened in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. You just haven't got anything to refute my post, or you are too chicken-with-her-head-in-the-sand to do so.
You mean that I risked my life when I had a D&C? You are free to have your delusions. I prefer to believe the
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, American Osteopathic Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics
- National Physicians Alliance, American Academy of Nursing, Center for American Progress D/B/A Doctors for America, American Nurses Association, and Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
- Public Health Deans, Department Chairs, and Faculty and the American Public Health Association
- Society of Hospital Medicine and Society of OB/GYN Hospitalists
- Medical Staff Professionals
- Social Science Researchers
Yup you sure did.