Meuller To Give 'Statement' (RIGHT NOW) From DOJ In Lieu Of Testifying Under Oath

[sparky]

another all hat, no cattle thread

~S~

 

[Wyatt earp]

I support impeachment. Impeach immediately.

PLEASE DO IT I BEG YOU.

Exactly make into a bigger partisan war then Obama could do

Fags/ baby killers/ illegal rapist killer Mexicans VS patriotic Americans


.

The investigation was partisan from the beginning.

Exactly, they were trying to impeach Trump before he was sworn in, this is going to be so funny if they start the impeachment hearings before an election.


.

 

[Dragonlady]

Mueller has once again proven that Barr is a treasonous liar. Not only did Barr spin Mueller's report - he flat out lied about it. Barr should be IMPEACHED for violating his oath of office and lying to the American people.

Please do cite where Mueller said Barr "flat out loud about it". Be specific.

Mr. Barr said that Mueller told him that the DOJ prohibition on indicting the potus had nothing to do with his decision not to charge Trump last month.

Mr. Mueller today said that the DOJ prohibition against criminally charging the President was the ONLY reason why he didn't.

One of the two are lying.

I believe Mueller is lying. Then he walked away from the whole thing.

What you BELIEVE, is irrelevant. It’s what can be proven that’s important.

 

[sparky]

It’s what can be proven that’s important.

zip....zero...nada....~S~

 

[Frankeneinstein]

What you BELIEVE, is irrelevant. It’s what can be proven that’s important.

What if he has "complete confidence" that there is no proof that mueller is not lying?

 

[Polishprince]

I think after that it's clear that Mueller was never going to indict a sitting president rather the constitutional remedy is impeachment. It was loud and clear if you have at least 2 brain cells.

You mean loud & clear to bitter leftards who, coincidentally, never have more than 2 brain cells. As you may recall, the clamor for Trump Jr's head and that of Kushner were "loud and clear" as well as calls for anyone connected to the POTUS to be fired & shot at dawn. Y'all were certain they were complicit.

So exactly how many Americans have been convicted or even indicted for conspiring with the foreign meddlers? How many of your media sources have admitted they have been feeding you the LIES you have so eagerly swallowed the last 2 years?

It’s ironic that you question other people’s intelligence, when it’s obvious you are so clueless to have your entire head embedded the the posterior of a pathological liar, a multiple adulter, a six-time bankruptcy deadbeat, who had daddy get him out of serving his country and of course the greatest narcissist ever.
Has there ever been such a horseshit slimeball in the presidency? Not quite a good role model for your kids or grandkids

Prove to us Trump filed personal bankruptcy and I will wait

Personal? Whoever said that? He throws his debt into companies that investors pay for when those companies go bankrupt.

Anyone who loans money for risky ventures like those that Trump engages in aren't babes in the woods. They know the risks, they know about getting security/insurance for their claims, they make sure they are compensated. Trump doesn't borrow the last 5 cents from widows.

 

[Polishprince]

Mueller has once again proven that Barr is a treasonous liar. Not only did Barr spin Mueller's report - he flat out lied about it. Barr should be IMPEACHED for violating his oath of office and lying to the American people.

Please do cite where Mueller said Barr "flat out loud about it". Be specific.

Mr. Barr said that Mueller told him that the DOJ prohibition on indicting the potus had nothing to do with his decision not to charge Trump last month.

Mr. Mueller today said that the DOJ prohibition against criminally charging the President was the ONLY reason why he didn't.

One of the two are lying.

I believe Mueller is lying. Then he walked away from the whole thing.

The fact that Mr. Mueller refused to take followup questions, and also is refusing to testify to Congress, tells me that he doesn't think his story will hold up. So, yes, he's probably lying.

 

[Faun]

Mueller agrees with the 720 Republican and Democratic former federal prosecutors that actually read Mueller's Report that agree, that Trump only escaped the criminal charges of Obstruction of Justice because of the Judicial Department does not allow an indictment of a sitting president.
It's that simple and facts are facts.

He could have recommended it...the House issues indictments...called impeachment. But you must have legal grounds. The Democrats have no legal grounds.

You have to have a willing Senate who would actually indict. We don't.

FFS ... 2 full years of impeachment talk and you still don't know how it works? The Senate does not indict. Bush92 even spelled it out for all low-info leftarded asses: the House impeaches (indictment) and the Senate conducts the trial.

Excuse me, convict, not indict. But look at how excited you got. It was worth it just to make your day.

So now you pretend you knew and just misspoke?

LOLOL

What's hysterical is that you were actually posting on the "sewer" thread when I explained it all to obejoekenobe...

TC’mon, man. That’s just Ant stupid. The Senate doesn’t vote to impeach. They can only try an impeached president.

Then what is the senate doing when they vote to remove an office holder from office!?

But go on.

lol

Removing him/her from office

Which is called........?

... a conviction.

.... and you're so brain-dead, you think I didn't misspeak even though you saw me post how the Senate convicts. You, more than anyone else in this thread, should have known that. Looks like you're even dumber than you appear.

 

[Dragonlady]

What you BELIEVE, is irrelevant. It’s what can be proven that’s important.

What if he has "complete confidence" that there is no proof that mueller is not lying?

Having “complete confidence” won’t get you a cup of coffee in a court of law.

 

[SAYIT]

He could have recommended it...the House issues indictments...called impeachment. But you must have legal grounds. The Democrats have no legal grounds.

You have to have a willing Senate who would actually indict. We don't.

FFS ... 2 full years of impeachment talk and you still don't know how it works? The Senate does not indict. Bush92 even spelled it out for all low-info leftarded asses: the House impeaches (indictment) and the Senate conducts the trial.

Excuse me, convict, not indict. But look at how excited you got. It was worth it just to make your day.

So now you pretend you knew and just misspoke?

LOLOL

What's hysterical is that you were actually posting on the "sewer" thread when I explained it all to obejoekenobe...

TC’mon, man. That’s just Ant stupid. The Senate doesn’t vote to impeach. They can only try an impeached president.

Then what is the senate doing when they vote to remove an office holder from office!?

But go on.

lol

Removing him/her from office

Which is called........?

... a conviction.

.... and you're so brain-dead, you think I didn't misspeak even though you saw me post how the Senate convicts. You, more than anyone else in this thread, should have known that. Looks like you're even dumber than you appear.

You may find this shocking but I don't even attempt to keep track of bitter, leftarded silliness. You will note that I was not a party to your conversation with Dopie Opie. You may in your lucid moments know that the Senate does not indict but I did read your post here in which you stated "You have to have a willing Senate who would actually indict." I readily admit I don't know what is going on in your head.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Having complete confidence Won’t get you a cup of coffee in a court of law.

 

[Lesh]

What did Mueller say today?

He said that Barr was lying when he claimed that the DOJ OLC opinion that a President can't be indicted played no part in Mueller's findings

He said that Barr was lying when he claimed that Mueller wanted BARR not Congress to make any further decisions as to charges or impeachment or further investigations

More importantly he said that Trump was lying when he said that Russia did nothing in the election. In fact it was a Russian military operation and a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated effort to help Trump get elected (despite what Trump claims to believe that came FROM Putin)

 

[Polishprince]

What did Mueller say today?

He said that Barr was lying when he claimed that the DOJ OLC opinion that a President can't be indicted played no part in Mueller's findings

He said that Barr was lying when he claimed that Mueller wanted BARR not Congress to make any further decisions as to charges or impeachment or further investigations

More importantly he said that Trump was lying when he said that Russia did nothing in the election. In fact it was a Russian military operation and a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated effort to help Trump get elected (despite what Trump claims to believe that came FROM Putin)

however, Mueller didn't offer any actual PROOF of his statements, and like I pointed out above, there are no followup questions being taken by the Mule.

One thing which he said was that Democrat Party computers were hacked by the Russian Federation. But considering the fact that the DNC declined to send their servers to the FBI, I don't know how he could make that conclusion.

 

[hadit]

So where did Mueller say The President Definitely Obstructed Justice?

I thought you turd burglers were telling us that Trump was a Russian Puppet and any day now, Mueller was going to have The President of The United States in Handcuffs.

What happened to that?

Premature Ejaculation again for you?

And don't you have to commit a crime to obstruct justice?

It is not a crime to defend yourself against unjust accusations and an illegal investigation in search of a crime that was never committed.

Can you show me in The Mueller Report where beating Hillary Clinton's Ass in the 2016 Election is "Obstruction of Justice?"

I would admit it was Obstruction of Hillary Clinton's Corrupt Russian Owned Fat Ass sitting in The Oval Office, but other than that....

A big fat Nothingburger.

Kinda like your life.

He said there was no evidence to show trump didn't obstruct and that he didn't seek indictment himself because a sitting president can't be indicted

Pretty much justifies the Congress to launch their own investigations into the matter.

There doesn't have to be evidence Trump didn't obstruct. There has to be evidence he did. Minus that, he's clear. Now, why do you think Congress is going to do a better job than Mueller did?

The Congress has an action (impeachment) against a sitting president, if the evidence warrants it; whereas a Special Counsel has none since a sitting president can't be indicted. Mueller's investigation is left wide open, neither confirming obstruction nor eliminating it. It's up to the Congress now to sort it out.

Sort it out? Doesn't sound like there's much need for any other investigation then, since they're not going to find anything Mueller didn't. So it should take a few days. Look at the report and decide. But I can tell you that the report doesn't make a slam dunk case, and impeachment would be very risky. There's no way they convict him, and they just look petty after insisting on the report, then pushing ahead anyway.

Nothing in Congress takes a few days and just looking at the report is insufficient since much of it is redacted. I suspect they will crank up investigations to sort this out. I hope they don't impeach him based on what I've seen so far. I'd rather see it left up to the American people to decide in the 2020 election.

Much of it redacted? Are you sure about that? Might want to check, because last I heard, it was maybe 3%, at least for the copy that the democrats refuse to look at. I agree, though, that impeaching now, with the report, is a very risky proposition.

 

[Polishprince]

What I thought was also interesting is that no close Trump associates charged with Obstruction or Collusion at all. No one in the Trump Family, no one in the Trump cabinet. Any of those folks could have easily been indicted, but the Mule didn't do it, and now the investigation is over. This entire "investigation" was just a scam IMHO to boost Mueller's income.

 

[Bush92]

What you BELIEVE, is irrelevant. It’s what can be proven that’s important.

What if he has "complete confidence" that there is no proof that mueller is not lying?

Having “complete confidence” won’t get you a cup of coffee in a court of law.

Neither will having no evidence of a crime. Which the Democrats have zero, notta, none, nyet, non, nein.

 

[Faun]

You have to have a willing Senate who would actually indict. We don't.

FFS ... 2 full years of impeachment talk and you still don't know how it works? The Senate does not indict. Bush92 even spelled it out for all low-info leftarded asses: the House impeaches (indictment) and the Senate conducts the trial.

Excuse me, convict, not indict. But look at how excited you got. It was worth it just to make your day.

So now you pretend you knew and just misspoke?

LOLOL

What's hysterical is that you were actually posting on the "sewer" thread when I explained it all to obejoekenobe...

Then what is the senate doing when they vote to remove an office holder from office!?

But go on.

lol

Removing him/her from office

Which is called........?

... a conviction.

.... and you're so brain-dead, you think I didn't misspeak even though you saw me post how the Senate convicts. You, more than anyone else in this thread, should have known that. Looks like you're even dumber than you appear.

You may find this shocking but I don't even attempt to keep track of bitter, leftarded silliness. You will note that I was not a party to your conversation with Dopie Opie. You may in your lucid moments know that the Senate does not indict but I did read your post here in which you stated "You have to have a willing Senate who would actually indict." I readily admit I don't know what is going on in your head.

"You will note that I was not a party to your conversation with Dopie Opie."

But you were replying to posts intermingled, so you couldn't have missed that part of the thread which went on for some time. Your inability to retain information is indicative of your dysfunctional brain. And that's on you, not me.

 

[caddo kid]

What I thought was also interesting is that no close Trump associates charged with Obstruction or Collusion at all. No one in the Trump Family, no one in the Trump cabinet. Any of those folks could have easily been indicted, but the Mule didn't do it, and now the investigation is over. This entire "investigation" was just a scam IMHO to boost Mueller's income.

Then you did NOT read the report, BECAUSE IF YOU WOULD HAVE READ THE GODDAMN REPORT you would ALREADY KNOW that Trump himself was the ONLY person to have performed any obstructive acts.

Trump's subordinates, and Trump associates were TOO FUCKING INTELLIGENT to perform the obstructive acts that TRUMP REQUESTED.

AGAIN, YOU DID NOT READ THE GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, THUS you have NO FUCKING IDEA WTF you R talking about.

When you dig your head out of your ass, when you read the GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, then get back to US, when you have one fucking clue what the fuck you are talking about.

GO, READ THE GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT.

 

[Bush92]

What I thought was also interesting is that no close Trump associates charged with Obstruction or Collusion at all. No one in the Trump Family, no one in the Trump cabinet. Any of those folks could have easily been indicted, but the Mule didn't do it, and now the investigation is over. This entire "investigation" was just a scam IMHO to boost Mueller's income.

Then you did NOT read the report, BECAUSE IF YOU WOULD HAVE READ THE GODDAMN REPORT you would ALREADY KNOW that Trump himself was the ONLY person to have performed any obstructive acts.

Trump's subordinates, and Trump associates were TOO FUCKING INTELLIGENT to perform the obstructive acts that TRUMP REQUESTED.

AGAIN, YOU DID NOT READ THE GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, THUS you have NO FUCKING IDEA WTF you R talking about.

When you dig your head out of your ass, when you read the GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, then get back to US, when you have one fucking clue what the fuck you are talking about.

READ THE GODDAMN REPORT.

Trump never obstructed justice. It’s all hearsay.

 

[caddo kid]

What I thought was also interesting is that no close Trump associates charged with Obstruction or Collusion at all. No one in the Trump Family, no one in the Trump cabinet. Any of those folks could have easily been indicted, but the Mule didn't do it, and now the investigation is over. This entire "investigation" was just a scam IMHO to boost Mueller's income.

Then you did NOT read the report, BECAUSE IF YOU WOULD HAVE READ THE GODDAMN REPORT you would ALREADY KNOW that Trump himself was the ONLY person to have performed any obstructive acts.

Trump's subordinates, and Trump associates were TOO FUCKING INTELLIGENT to perform the obstructive acts that TRUMP REQUESTED.

AGAIN, YOU DID NOT READ THE GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, THUS you have NO FUCKING IDEA WTF you R talking about.

When you dig your head out of your ass, when you read the GODDAMN FUCKING REPORT, then get back to US, when you have one fucking clue what the fuck you are talking about.

READ THE GODDAMN REPORT.

Trump never obstructed justice. It’s all hearsay.

WELL, IT'S OBVIOUS YOU DID NOT READ THE GODDAMN REPORT EITHER