Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet we still have no clue as to what crime they are investigating.Why did the FBI raid the office of Trump lawyer Michael Cohen?
...federal agents seized “records related to several topics including payments to a pornographic-film actress,” presumably referring to the $130,000 payments Cohen made to Stephanie Clifford—who is known professionally as Stormy Daniels—during the 2016 campaign. According to the Times, the search warrants were obtained by the federal prosecutor in Manhattan after receiving a referral from special counsel Robert Mueller.
Executing a search warrant against any attorney’s office, let alone a personal lawyer for the president of the United States, is no small matter.
Attorney and legal blogger Ken White noted that the federal guidelines require prosecutors to seek approval from the Justice Department’s upper echelons before applying for a warrant targeting a lawyer’s office.
That DOJ officials approved the raid suggests that the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan had an extremely good reason to search Cohen’s workplace.
This is the first public indication that Cohen is involved in a federal investigation that’s unrelated to Mueller’s inquiry into Russian election meddling.
Correct! It's super interesting.And yet we still have no clue as to what crime they are investigating.
But Cohen acted on his own behalf and not on Trump's so this is irrelevant.Just because you don't know the law, doesn't mean there is no law.There is no such rule.the ethics rule bus, that now has cause to disbar him for acting on a client's behalf, without the client knowing...
https://www.nysba.org/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=50671
NEW YORK RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Effective April 1, 2009
Rule: 1.4 Communication.
A lawyer shall: (1) promptly inform the client of:
(iii) material developments in the matter including settlement or plea offers.
(3) keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter;
Communicating with Client [2]
In instances where these Rules require that a particular decision about the representation be made by the client, paragraph (a)(1) requires that the lawyer promptly consult with the client and secure the client’s consent prior to taking action, unless prior discussions with the client have resolved what action the client wants the lawyer to take. For example, paragraph (a)(1)(iii) requires that a lawyer who receives from opposing counsel an offer of settlement in a civil controversy or a proffered plea bargain in a criminal case must promptly inform the client of its substance unless the client has previously made clear that the proposal will be acceptable or unacceptable or has authorized the lawyer to accept or to reject the offer.
Rosenstein ( a Trump appointee)
Actually Rosenstine was an Obama holdover that Sessions attempted to fire but The Donald gave Swamp Rat Rosenstine a pass (maybe to not be accused of anti-semitism?). BIG MISTAKE.
Again, I have to say.... it is truly amazing that you are so confident of this, despite, by any rational estimation, having no possible clue as to the truth of it.But Cohen acted on his own behalf and not on Trump's so this is irrelevant.
Since Trump was not a party to the agreement, arbitration would be between Cohen and Daniels.We'll see if she has to pay anything. I figured she had violated the agreement but someone else pointed out the agreement states....She entered a contract with Cohen, not with Trump, and she is being sued for violating that contract so a court will decide how much she will have to pay for violating the contract.trump, david dennison, was a part of the NDA....Stupid question. If he used Trump's money then he paid her on behalf of Trump, but if he used his own money he paid her on his own behalf and there was no connection to Trump.then why did Cohen LIE and say he took out a mortgage on his house to pay for it, if there was a large retainer in place that could have accommodated the $130k payment?
Which he never signed, so the NDA was never completed and so on and etc.
They can't hold HER to it if HE never signed it.
... going to arbitration was an agreement between DD and PP that all disputes be settled in arbitration .... only DD, i.e., Donald Trump, never agreed to that.5.2 Dispute Resolution. In recognition of the mutual benefits to DD and PP of a voluntary system of alternative dispute resolution which involves binding confidential arbitration of all disputes which may arise between them, it is their intention and agreement that any and all claims or controversies arising between DD on the one hand, and PP on the other hand, shall be resolved by binding confidential Arbitration to the greatest extent permitted by law. Arbitration shall take place before JAMS ENDISPUTE (“JAMS”) pursuant to JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures (including Interim Measures) (“JAMS Rules”) and the law selected by DD, (such selection shall be limited to either, California, Nevada or Arizona), or before ACTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION SER VICES (“ADRS”) pursuant to the ADRS Rules (including Interim Measures) and the law selected by DD (whichever the claimant elects upon filing an arbitration), in a the location selected by DD, and will be heard and decided by a sole, neutral arbitrator (“Arbitrator”) selected either by agreement of the Parties, or if the Parties are unable to agree, then selected under the Rules of the selected arbitration service…
But Cohen acted on his own behalf and not on Trump's so this is irrelevant.
Yeah. Cohen is going down. He is guiltahhh.Really? Are you Stupid or just pretending to be stupid.
Communication rule require a lawyer to tell his client all the actions he 's taking on his behalf. And the NDA was on Trumps behalf.
Even if Trump told his "Fixer" to do whatever it takes, allowing him to take independent action , he is still required to keep his client informed what he did.
Wow, we are truly blessed to be in the presence of so many talented clairvoyants.Yeah. Cohen is going down. He is guiltahhh.
Trump is not
Since Trump was not a party to the agreement, arbitration would be between Cohen and Daniels.... going to arbitration was an agreement between DD and PP that all disputes be settled in arbitration .... only DD, i.e., Donald Trump, never agreed to that.
You cannot have it both ways. Trump did not commit a campaign finance violation or ANY violation, if he paid off Stormy with his own money. Cohen may have committed such a violation, but it's on him, not Trump.Wow, we are truly blessed to be in the presence of so many talented clairvoyants.
But he can make you an intended third-party beneficiary, which would give you standing.Read it again, all disputes are between DD and PP.
Cohen can not take it to arbitration except as Trumps attorney. And so far his independent actions in drafting the NDA without any input from Trump, voids the NDA
Put simply, Your lawyer can't enter a contract that obligates you, without you agreeing to it. He can't buy you a vacation time-share, even if he pays for it.
Yeah. Cohen is going down. He is guiltahhh.
Trump is not.
What's the point?
Maybe not. What's the result as to Trump?Do you think Cohen would take one for Trump. Disbarred, fined, FEC prosecution, money laundering.
IN the payment? Simple, it could be That trump evaded campaign finance laws by asking Cohen to do it.Tell me where Trump may be implicated?
You cannot have it both ways. Trump did not commit a campaign finance violation or ANY violation, if he paid off Stormy with his own money. Cohen may have committed such a violation, but it's on him, not Trump.Wow, we are truly blessed to be in the presence of so many talented clairvoyants.
Tell me where Trump may be implicated?
Asking his lawyer to pay on a contract? Which campaign finance law is he violating?IN the payment? Simple, it could be That trump evaded campaign finance laws by asking Cohen to do it.
The DOPer Style looks seem to be confident of his future. LOL! The 'D-' Team!
View attachment 187144
