yidnar
Diamond Member
That didn't happen.
![www.bostonherald.com](https://www.bostonherald.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/AP20123609190378.jpg?w=1024&h=683)
Democrats say ‘believe all women’ — just not Tara Reade
Due process is making a huge comeback in 2020 thanks to Tara Reade.
![www.bostonherald.com](https://www.bostonherald.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/HeraldIcon.jpg?w=32)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That didn't happen.
And Tara Reade was listened to and it was found that she contradicted herself.![]()
Democrats say ‘believe all women’ — just not Tara Reade
Due process is making a huge comeback in 2020 thanks to Tara Reade.www.bostonherald.com
We don't need to return to any old America. That America was immoral, dark, and depraved.
The other people were allowed to have their own neighborhood.It is when you bar "certain people" from buying a house they can afford, simply because of your fears.
It's immoral to be a Christian nation???The United States was founded on an immoral foundation. Thereforee immorality has been a tradition. There has been no downfall.
Mainly because the greatest generation was in charge and drunk driving was encouraged LOL...Stick me in the Way-Back Machine, take me to 1972, and just leave me.
![]()
It was in the fifties and it can be now.And I've been trying for decades to get them to understand that morality is not within the purview of the state.
It is funny how you jump from one position to the next.2 women testifying of similar events, would not be allowed to testify at a criminal trail, You know why, just because an Axe murderer killed this person, does not mean they killed this other person. Completely inadmissible.
The other people were allowed to have their own neighborhood.
It's immoral to be a Christian nation???
.That didn't happen.
Irrelevant and hearsay, legally speaking, I know from personal experience.It is funny how you jump from one position to the next.
First, you come up with a novel and bullshit standard for admissibility in criminal proceedings. There are countless examples of witnesses being called by the government, testifying to past similar behavior in order to establish guilt for something.
Sad, if a crime is committed, it is time to step up and report the crime.Then you come up with some bullshit moral obligation for someone who's told about sexual abuse. Let me tell you. I've been personally put it that position by someone I love, with the express request to not tell the police. She understandingly didn't want to go through the excruciatingly painful experience in court. My obligation is to that victims wishes. Nor does the fact that she didn't want to go to the police in any way made me doubt the veracity of her claim.
30 years after the fact, it is bullshit.Take his name out of it. Joe is caught on tape he grabs women by the pussy. Joe is accused by a woman that he grabbed her by the pussy. Two other people stepped forward she told them she was grabbed by the pussy, and another two state they too were grabbed like that by Joe. A psychiatrist tells the court she shows signs of being assaulted. And finally Joe gets deposed and gets caught lying about knowing her and admits he doesn't know it's good or bad that powerful get away with rape because of their status.
Are you honestly going to claim you can't decide Joe did exactly what he's accused of, beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal trial with that evidence?
Sad, if a crime is committed, it is time to step up and report the crime.
There is a reason there are statue of limitations, which got thrown out specifically to prosecute Trump. Our Justice system must be fair. Accusing people of crimes 30 years after the fact results in innocent people going to jail.
Really? This coming from somebody who's calling somebody a liar despite all the evidence to the contrary presented in a court of law.Sad, if a crime is committed, it is time to step up and report the crime.
There is a reason there are statue of limitations, which got thrown out specifically to prosecute Trump. Our Justice system must be fair. Accusing people of crimes 30 years after the fact results in innocent people going to jail.
I wish you would stop using legal terms you apparently don't understand. Hearsay is relating something that somebody else was told. It is once removed from the actual person making the claim.Irrelevant and hearsay, legally speaking, I know from personal experience.
Mike Johnson is right, it's time to get the old America back. It's time we embraced morality again. This is indeed a battle of good versus evil.
---The now-House speaker called US culture "dark and depraved" on a World Prayer Network call.---
30 years after the fact, it is bullshit.
Psychiatrist? Big deal, anybody can get a Psychiatrist that says the opposite.
This woman was so traumatized? She was telling strangers at a party. So traumatized she calls two friends but not the police.
You think what other people say shows Trump is guilty. Well, let us look at Trump's behavior and apply the same standard. Trump only dates young super models, not old women. By your standard that carries as much weight and should be admissible as evidence. Case closed, you won the case for Trump.
Apparently not. Trump had the chance to do so if that's the case. As I said the only witness he called in for his defense ended up calling in sick.Psychiatrist? Big deal, anybody can get a Psychiatrist that says the opposite.
According to Trump in a deposition under oath he couldn't distinguish between the woman he raped and his then wife.Trump only dates young super models, not old women.
police can not testify to what happened based on what a witness states, that is hearsayI wish you would stop using legal terms you apparently don't understand. Hearsay is relating something that somebody else was told. It is once removed from the actual person making the claim.
Relating what a victim of a crime told you happened is not hearsay. Otherwise no cop for instance could testify to a confession.
Nor is testifying about a previous rape irrelevant to trying to prove another rape occurred. If nothing else it establishes a pattern of behavior.