danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #441
You are special pleading. An economy is more than just microeconomics. Higher paid Labor at that wage rate tend to spend most of their disposable income sooner rather than later. HIgher demand could make up the difference along with more incentive to optimize for the bottom line.It would be, but a Minimum wage is a minimum not a maximum. An increase in wages creates more demand and generates more in federal income tax revenue. In the long run, a positive multiplier will apply to help correct that contraction.It should shift the low wage sector of employment to a new equilibrium. An increase in the minimum wage is a market friendly, Institutional upward pressure on wages in the rest of the sector.Toddsterpatriot, you quote me, and then ignore any portion of my post that inconvenience your arguments.... economic concepts which are often also political concepts, are generally not proven “beyond any reasonable doubt”. Much more often it’s the preponderance of evidence [and logical analysis leading us to determine the validity of those concepts].
Or, in the case of your claim, no evidence.
IMO our differences are less due to my lacking a preponderance of evidence and logical analysis leading to determining the validity of my arguments, but rather more to your inability to recognize the preponderance of those arguments’ validity. Respectfully, Supposn
IMO our differences are less due to my lacking a preponderance of evidence
You haven't posted any evidence to back up your opinion that,
"the minimum wage substantially effects 32% of USA's employees' rates"
It should shift the low wage sector of employment to a new equilibrium.
View attachment 414761
DURR.
An increase in wages creates more demand
View attachment 415106
and generates more in federal income tax revenue.
The higher business tax rate means a drop in federal income tax revenue.
21% is higher than 10% and higher than 12%, no matter how much weed you smoke.