Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Toddsterpatriot, your post does not answer the questions I asked. You're unable or unwilling to provide a link to the my post you’re referring to? You're unable or unwilling to explain what fault you find within that unidentified post?you have yet to provide a link to the post you’re referring to.ToddsterPatriot, you have yet to provide a link to my post you’re referring to. I cannot guess what in context to that unidentified post, you find problematic? Why you have yet to provide a link to the post you’re referring to. Why or how, (in your opinion), is my unidentified post at fault? Respectfully, Supposn
“Real earnings for workers while they remained employed would increase by $64 billion” while “real earnings for workers while they were jobless would decrease by $20 billion” is a net increase of the nation’s wages. ...
... Why or how, (in your opinion), is my unidentified post at fault?
At fault? Hardly.
Just an earlier example of an erroneous claim you made about net benefits.
Yes, I will stipulate an increase of $64 and a decrease of $20 billion is a net increase. Are you quoting from a particular page of a particular Congressional Budget Office's report? I cannot comment further until you respond more specifically. Respectfully, Supposn
You're unable or unwilling to provide a link to the my post you’re referring to?
Ummm....the link is in post #498, to your post #183.....in this thread.
Are you Joe Biden? Do you have sundowners?
Yes, I will stipulate an increase of $64 and a decrease of $20 billion is a net increase.
Yes, you'll stipulate to your error. Excellent!
Are you quoting from a particular page of a particular Congressional Budget Office's report?
You can't remember your own link from the CBO?
The one that I showed refuted your own claim?
That's funny.