Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First off stupid I am not progressive and am a christian so I do think marriage is between a man and a woman and the isd the first amendment that sayd you cant force others against their religious beliefs. 10th amendment allows STATES to manage their own marriage contracts.That states can act on???? Yes dipshit that's why we have it.Maybe you should read what I wrote dumbass. There is no right to secede. None. It is not in the constitution or bill of rights.....These little truth seem to stump you.You dont have a right to secede first ....Second If you are a supporter of confederates you support slavery since that was what they were about....I know you like to believe they were for states rights but the only right they cared about was the one that wrongly said they could own people.
kaz: I don't support the confederacy, I support the right of secession.
Thanatos: Duh, dar, drool, oh, that means you support slavery since you support the confederacy. Drool, drool
Thanks for showing all stupid people are not liberals. Sometimes it seems that way, but I think it's important to remember you're well represented on the right too
So the only rights that exist are the ones that are specifically enumerated in the Constitution? Then where is the right of gays to marry or force a business to serve them?
You just said there is no right to secede because it's not in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. If that's the case, there's no right for gays to marry or force a business to serve them.
According to you, the states can't act. Otherwise, they could secede.
You really aren't very good at this logic thing, are you?
No he was a republican. If he was a racist he would be a democrat or confederate.1858?That is not the point silly senior dude.That was bullshit
It was never a practical option
The point is, which sadly I must spell it out for you due to you lack of...something, Lincoln considered deporting all blacks and hoped to get it accomplished in his second term. It was not practical, but it should tell you something about your beloved Dishonest Abe, but you being you, I have no hope.
Actually, the country of Liberia was formed for free slaves
Lincoln understood what bunch of racist assholes existed in the south and doubted if blacks could ever be "free" there. As it is, Lincoln was right and it took force 100 years later to finally give blacks freedom in the south
ROFL! So Lincoln's plan to send them back to Africa was to protect them from American racists? I've got news for you, bub, Lincoln was a white supremacist:
“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Abraham Lincoln, Charlston IL, 1858
That opinion was held by southerners for 100 years after Lincoln said that
Could you answer this question in a yes or no fashion?
Was Lincoln a white supremacist?
I don't know why you're so angry
I was just pointing out some observations. I never once said "everyone" or you specifically, I stated "people most likely". I don't know why you're freaking out, but you need to get a hold of yourself. It's pathetic
Also, 'libertarian'?
Don't make me laugh. I have VERY seldom met a 'libertarian' that wasn't just a conservative without the guts to commit to the label. Looking through some of your posting history shows me that you're just another one of these..
Trying to discredit what I said above is like me calling you a dog, and you going "Wrong, I'm a cocker spaniel." You're not fooling anyone, least of all me.
You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy.
I'm not going to try to convince you of your ignorance, but don't misrepresent your ignorant opinions as fact
That's just embarrassing for everyone involved. Also, reading comprehension of the phrase 'people most likely' would have saved us from seeing your pitiful emotional outburst. Please use better judgement when posting.
Thanks.
Oh please...and you call others stupid.No he was a republican. If he was a racist he would be a democrat or confederate.1858?That is not the point silly senior dude.
The point is, which sadly I must spell it out for you due to you lack of...something, Lincoln considered deporting all blacks and hoped to get it accomplished in his second term. It was not practical, but it should tell you something about your beloved Dishonest Abe, but you being you, I have no hope.
Actually, the country of Liberia was formed for free slaves
Lincoln understood what bunch of racist assholes existed in the south and doubted if blacks could ever be "free" there. As it is, Lincoln was right and it took force 100 years later to finally give blacks freedom in the south
ROFL! So Lincoln's plan to send them back to Africa was to protect them from American racists? I've got news for you, bub, Lincoln was a white supremacist:
“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Abraham Lincoln, Charlston IL, 1858
That opinion was held by southerners for 100 years after Lincoln said that
Could you answer this question in a yes or no fashion?
Was Lincoln a white supremacist?
Yep. Just look at these Democrats today:They simply cannot justify slavery though for it is morally, ethically, and legally wrong and always has been.
The democrats sure did try hard to justify it, and exhibit many of the same tendencies today.
Except Fredrick Douglass said he was......Dummy it is called a contingency plan.....Believe it or not they still make stupid shit like that up.... It is sad you think you are conservative with you lack of actual historical knowledge.Actually, the country of Liberia was formed for free slaves
Lincoln understood what bunch of racist assholes existed in the south and doubted if blacks could ever be "free" there. As it is, Lincoln was right and it took force 100 years later to finally give blacks freedom in the south
ROFL! So Lincoln's plan to send them back to Africa was to protect them from American racists? I've got news for you, bub, Lincoln was a white supremacist:
“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Abraham Lincoln, Charlston IL, 1858
I just quoted a speech that shows Lincoln is a white supremacist, and you call that a "contingency plan?" It's pathetic that all you dim bulbs think you know something about Lincoln and the Civil War. You're a bunch of dumbasses.
True. Lincoln wasn't an abolitionist. He did not support blacks having equal rights to whites and he wanted to send blacks back to Africa to be rid of them. But hey, it stands in the way of the liberal narrative
That states can act on???? Yes dipshit that's why we have it.Maybe you should read what I wrote dumbass. There is no right to secede. None. It is not in the constitution or bill of rights.....These little truth seem to stump you.You dont have a right to secede first ....Second If you are a supporter of confederates you support slavery since that was what they were about....I know you like to believe they were for states rights but the only right they cared about was the one that wrongly said they could own people.So the belief that States can secede from the union now means we believe in slavery.
Um...OK?
Have you ever been tested to see if you have an IQ?
kaz: I don't support the confederacy, I support the right of secession.
Thanatos: Duh, dar, drool, oh, that means you support slavery since you support the confederacy. Drool, drool
Thanks for showing all stupid people are not liberals. Sometimes it seems that way, but I think it's important to remember you're well represented on the right too
So the only rights that exist are the ones that are specifically enumerated in the Constitution? Then where is the right of gays to marry or force a business to serve them?
No he was a republican. If he was a racist he would be a democrat or confederate.1858?That is not the point silly senior dude.
The point is, which sadly I must spell it out for you due to you lack of...something, Lincoln considered deporting all blacks and hoped to get it accomplished in his second term. It was not practical, but it should tell you something about your beloved Dishonest Abe, but you being you, I have no hope.
Actually, the country of Liberia was formed for free slaves
Lincoln understood what bunch of racist assholes existed in the south and doubted if blacks could ever be "free" there. As it is, Lincoln was right and it took force 100 years later to finally give blacks freedom in the south
ROFL! So Lincoln's plan to send them back to Africa was to protect them from American racists? I've got news for you, bub, Lincoln was a white supremacist:
“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races—that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Abraham Lincoln, Charlston IL, 1858
That opinion was held by southerners for 100 years after Lincoln said that
Could you answer this question in a yes or no fashion?
Was Lincoln a white supremacist?
Yep. Just look at these Democrats today:They simply cannot justify slavery though for it is morally, ethically, and legally wrong and always has been.
The democrats sure did try hard to justify it, and exhibit many of the same tendencies today.
Honk if you love Obama!
Sorry but you can't be a real libertarian and support Lincoln's War.You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy
I have lived in the South a long time and I have hardly seen any Confederate flags ever.
Yep. Just look at these Democrats today:They simply cannot justify slavery though for it is morally, ethically, and legally wrong and always has been.
The democrats sure did try hard to justify it, and exhibit many of the same tendencies today.
Honk if you love Obama!
How do you know they aren't Democrats? Odium, who is a big white supremacist, is a socialist.
Sorry but you can't be a real libertarian and support Lincoln's War.You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy
I’m confused, you wrote this to S who isn’t a libertarian and while I am a libertarian I don’t support Lincoln’s war. So who are you addressing?
I have lived in the South a long time and I have hardly seen any Confederate flags ever.
Wow. You really do walk around with your eyes clamped shut, don't you.
I'm sure every one of them is a Democrat...
My mistake. I thought he was claiming to be a libertarian, while loving Lincoln.Sorry but you can't be a real libertarian and support Lincoln's War.You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy
I’m confused, you wrote this to S who isn’t a libertarian and while I am a libertarian I don’t support Lincoln’s war. So who are you addressing?
Sorry but you can't be a real libertarian and support Lincoln's War.After reading through all of this, it seems that the people most likely to defend the Confederacy are:
Strawman. OK, race whore, we are defending secession, not "the confederacy." Stop being a dick and present our position correctly
*Conservative
Wrong, I'm a libertarian
*Southern
Wrong, I'm a northerner, I just live in the south
I get that no one actually wants to support slavery, they just want to support the act of rebellion, because they feel that it's an American principle or something.
Wrong, we oppose your socialist edifice and want you to stop forcing it on us
I guess myself, and the other moderates/liberals/anti-Confederate conservatives, don't look at it the same way.
No, you look at it through a fog of stupidity
You are equality of results regardless of the effort put in. We are equality of opportunity. You are correct that we don't look at it the same way. Other than that, it's like your whole life, wrong on pretty much everything. Starting with your test scores, probably why you can't follow a conversation and you want government to give you the money you won't/can't earnI am VERY pro-equality, regardless of what's in or isn't in the Constitution. I don't look at the Confederacy as a rag tag group of rebels fighting for American values, I see a group of people that couldn't socially progress at the same rate as the other regions in the nation, and paid the price for their ignorance. I don't see anything to celebrate. If I want to celebrate American rebellion, I'll read about the Revolutionary War
I don't know why you're so angry, I was just pointing out some observations. I never once said "everyone" or you specifically, I stated "people most likely". I don't know why you're freaking out, but you need to get a hold of yourself. It's pathetic.
Also, 'libertarian'?
Don't make me laugh. I have VERY seldom met a 'libertarian' that wasn't just a conservative without the guts to commit to the label. Looking through some of your posting history shows me that you're just another one of these..
Trying to discredit what I said above is like me calling you a dog, and you going "Wrong, I'm a cocker spaniel." You're not fooling anyone, least of all me.
You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy. I'm not going to try to convince you of your ignorance, but don't misrepresent your ignorant opinions as fact. That's just embarrassing for everyone involved. Also, reading comprehension of the phrase 'people most likely' would have saved us from seeing your pitiful emotional outburst. Please use better judgement when posting.
Thanks.
I would never claim the title of 'libertarian'. I think it's a foolish ideology that has no hope of ever working in reality.
Somalia is the closest thing the world has to a 'libertarian government'. What a joke.
My mistake. I thought he was claiming to be a libertarian, while loving Lincoln.Sorry but you can't be a real libertarian and support Lincoln's War.You have every right to support the secession of the Confederacy
I’m confused, you wrote this to S who isn’t a libertarian and while I am a libertarian I don’t support Lincoln’s war. So who are you addressing?
