Moody's Predicts Democrat Landslide

[Dad2three]

I have no fear because eventually people will figure out that left wing media outlets are seriously distorting the unemployment numbers in this country. When it becomes obvious that young people can't get jobs and people in there 20s can't find meaningful work then people may begin to figure it out. I fear it will take a generation or two because eventuall these stay at home kids will have kids of their own will have stay at home grand kids. Poor grandpa and grandpa can't afford to take care of them both.

There is one interesting fact and that is more and more articles have the phrase in this day and age it is not uncommon for 20 somethings to live at home with mom and dad. When the fuck did that ever become true in any part of the world for any generation?

Weird, lowest sustained tax "burden" on the job creators since 1932, and they aren't creating jobs? Even if their EFFECTIVE Corp tax rates are lowest in 40 years, WHILE for the first time EVER labor costs are less than half of their costs? Weird right?

I think this is the first time I've seen a democrat actually admit that the job market is extremely poor. It only took seven years....

REALLY? that's what you got out of it? Weird, I thought Dubya/GOP tax cuts were going to show how supply side worked Bubs? What happened? Oh right the biggest downturn since the first GOP great depression. Oops, yep the GOP digs WIDE and deep holes. Good thing Obama has presided over 12+ million jobs created since ending Dubya's recession. Over 9 million NET jobs since Obama came in, after Dubya/GOP policies lost over 1+ million in 8 years? lol

Yo, Government don`t create private sector jobs, only jobs in Government? Another words, Obama makes Government Bigger, so in turn the Socialist takes more of our money, and controlling the People by making more Regulations!!! So you can`t say Obama created millions of jobs! I do give him credit(fault) for all of the part-time jobs, only because of the train wreck called Obama-Care!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 48981

Weird you left out that entire 8 years of Dubya/GOP policy that was PROMISED to have "job creators" cutting loose and booming the economy, what happened Bubs? Dubya LOST over 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years?


Jul 14, 2014

Here's What Obama's 'Part-Time America' Really Looks Like

The president's critics love this talking point. But since 2010, full-time jobs are up 7.6 million, and part-time jobs have declined by more than 900,000.

How to Spread the Lie of 'Obama's Part-Time America'




Feb 7, 2014

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.






Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.

Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...





.. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...




.. and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs

 

[1stRambo]

I have no fear because eventually people will figure out that left wing media outlets are seriously distorting the unemployment numbers in this country. When it becomes obvious that young people can't get jobs and people in there 20s can't find meaningful work then people may begin to figure it out. I fear it will take a generation or two because eventuall these stay at home kids will have kids of their own will have stay at home grand kids. Poor grandpa and grandpa can't afford to take care of them both.

There is one interesting fact and that is more and more articles have the phrase in this day and age it is not uncommon for 20 somethings to live at home with mom and dad. When the fuck did that ever become true in any part of the world for any generation?

Weird, lowest sustained tax "burden" on the job creators since 1932, and they aren't creating jobs? Even if their EFFECTIVE Corp tax rates are lowest in 40 years, WHILE for the first time EVER labor costs are less than half of their costs? Weird right?

I think this is the first time I've seen a democrat actually admit that the job market is extremely poor. It only took seven years....

REALLY? that's what you got out of it? Weird, I thought Dubya/GOP tax cuts were going to show how supply side worked Bubs? What happened? Oh right the biggest downturn since the first GOP great depression. Oops, yep the GOP digs WIDE and deep holes. Good thing Obama has presided over 12+ million jobs created since ending Dubya's recession. Over 9 million NET jobs since Obama came in, after Dubya/GOP policies lost over 1+ million in 8 years? lol

Yo, Government don`t create private sector jobs, only jobs in Government? Another words, Obama makes Government Bigger, so in turn the Socialist takes more of our money, and controlling the People by making more Regulations!!! So you can`t say Obama created millions of jobs! I do give him credit(fault) for all of the part-time jobs, only because of the train wreck called Obama-Care!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 48981

Weird you left out that entire 8 years of Dubya/GOP policy that was PROMISED to have "job creators" cutting loose and booming the economy, what happened Bubs? Dubya LOST over 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years?


Jul 14, 2014

Here's What Obama's 'Part-Time America' Really Looks Like

The president's critics love this talking point. But since 2010, full-time jobs are up 7.6 million, and part-time jobs have declined by more than 900,000.

How to Spread the Lie of 'Obama's Part-Time America'




Feb 7, 2014

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.






Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.

Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...





.. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...




.. and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs

Yo, who dictates all your information? Obama The Liar!!! I rest my case!

"GTP"

 

[Dad2three]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

 

[rightwinger]

Depending on the candidate Republicans choose, Hillary will win between 320 and 420 electoral votes

The chances of a Republican getting to 270 are remote

 

[Dad2three]

Weird, lowest sustained tax "burden" on the job creators since 1932, and they aren't creating jobs? Even if their EFFECTIVE Corp tax rates are lowest in 40 years, WHILE for the first time EVER labor costs are less than half of their costs? Weird right?

I think this is the first time I've seen a democrat actually admit that the job market is extremely poor. It only took seven years....

REALLY? that's what you got out of it? Weird, I thought Dubya/GOP tax cuts were going to show how supply side worked Bubs? What happened? Oh right the biggest downturn since the first GOP great depression. Oops, yep the GOP digs WIDE and deep holes. Good thing Obama has presided over 12+ million jobs created since ending Dubya's recession. Over 9 million NET jobs since Obama came in, after Dubya/GOP policies lost over 1+ million in 8 years? lol

Yo, Government don`t create private sector jobs, only jobs in Government? Another words, Obama makes Government Bigger, so in turn the Socialist takes more of our money, and controlling the People by making more Regulations!!! So you can`t say Obama created millions of jobs! I do give him credit(fault) for all of the part-time jobs, only because of the train wreck called Obama-Care!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 48981

Weird you left out that entire 8 years of Dubya/GOP policy that was PROMISED to have "job creators" cutting loose and booming the economy, what happened Bubs? Dubya LOST over 1+ million PRIVATE sector jobs in 8 years?


Jul 14, 2014

Here's What Obama's 'Part-Time America' Really Looks Like

The president's critics love this talking point. But since 2010, full-time jobs are up 7.6 million, and part-time jobs have declined by more than 900,000.

How to Spread the Lie of 'Obama's Part-Time America'




Feb 7, 2014

The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America

The first thing you would expect to see from a Part-Time America is that the number of part-time jobs added would rival the number of full-time jobs added. But in the last year, new full-time jobs outnumbered part-time jobs by 1.8 million to 8,000. For every new part-time job, we're creating 225 full-time positions.






Okay, but one year is just one year! Let's keep looking.

The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.

Huh, nothing there. In fact, the number part-time workers has fallen in the last four years.

Okay, well, raw numbers can be deceiving. After all, the labor force has declined since 2010. So let's graph these part-time workers as a share of the labor force. Surely that will show a rising line...





.. dang it.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Three years of data just isn't much context. So let's draw back the lens and look at part-time workers as a share of the labor force since, say, 1980...




.. and then compare it to the unemployment rate (in RED) since 1980.

Okay, now here's something: Part-time work, as a share of the economy, is historically high. But these graphs don't make the point that Obama, or long-term global economic trends, are driving the rise in non-voluntary part-time work. Instead, the rise of part-time work seem to be 100 percent the creation of economic downturns. That's why it seems to be holding hands with unemployment, riding the roller coaster up during recessions, and down during recoveries.


The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs

Yo, who dictates all your information? Obama The Liar!!! I rest my case!

"GTP"
View attachment 49009

Your ad hom accepted in defeat Bubs

 

[1stRambo]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"

 

[Dad2three]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

 

[Darkwind]

Well that settles it!

Why even bother to hold an election?

You think that might be their intent? Hmmm.....

 

[PredFan]

Lol, left wing idiots!

 

[Dad2three]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

 

[Misty]

And these models are never wrong ...

Our Moody's Analytics election model now predicts a Democratic electoral landslide in the 2016 presidential vote. A small change in the forecast data in August has swung the outcome from the statistical tie predicted in July, to a razor-edge ballot outcome that nevertheless gives the incumbent party 326 electoral votes to the Republican challenger's 212.

Just three states account for the change in margin, with Ohio, Florida and Colorado swinging from leaning Republican to leaning Democrat. The margin of victory in each of these important swing states is still solidly within the margin of error though, and will likely swing back and forth in Moody's monthly updates ahead, underlining the closeness of the election to come. Furthermore, three of the candidates for the Republican nomination enjoy favorite-son status in Ohio or Florida, potentially making the outcome of those important states even more unpredictable.
​

Democrats to Win in a Landslide in 2016, According to Moody's Election Model

But just in case they are wrong lol

"It is important to note that themodel does not reflect results if an election were held today, but relies on Moody's Analytics economic forecasts to determine what the world will look like in November 2016. Should gasoline prices rebound above the current baseline forecast by election time, the results of the model will move more in favor of the challenging Republicans. The forecast for house prices also accelerated moderately.

 

[Zander]

Well that settles it!

Why even bother to hold an election?

You think that might be their intent? Hmmm.....

Not really. I think they want to sell newspapers and attract internet page views.

 

[Darkwind]

Well that settles it!

Why even bother to hold an election?

You think that might be their intent? Hmmm.....

Not really. I think they want to sell newspapers and attract internet page views.

Of course, but given their audience.....and America's propensity to read ONLY the headlines...

 

[1stRambo]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

Yo, Dunce, it doesn`t matter if it`s one voter fraud or one million? We have to show I.D. in everything we do, so I say I.D. the illegals!!! You know your girl Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to win an election, she is doing so bad!!!
So, if you don`t like the idea, tough shit, live with it!!!

It needs fixing, How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Read more at: Jaw-Dropping Study Claims Large Numbers of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. | National Review Online

"GTP"

 

[g5000]

"Our Moody's Analytics election model now predicts..."

Too bad Moody's didn't stick to business and forecast the 2008 crash.

 

[Dad2three]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

Yo, Dunce, it doesn`t matter if it`s one voter fraud or one million? We have to show I.D. in everything we do, so I say I.D. the illegals!!! You know your girl Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to win an election, she is doing so bad!!!
So, if you don`t like the idea, tough shit, live with it!!!

It needs fixing, How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Read more at: Jaw-Dropping Study Claims Large Numbers of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. | National Review Online

"GTP"
View attachment 49020

REALLY? Restricting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS to stop one illegal vote is good fiscal policy? lol

Wait ANOTHER CONservative "study" CLAIMS there illegals REGISTERED TO VOTE? AND THEN THEY TURN IT AROUND TO SAY THEY ACTUALLY VOTE? lol


Dubya's DOJ FIVE YEAR UNPRECEDENTED INVESTIGATION, WHERE THEY FIRED PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T PLAY POLITICS WITH THE GOP, LOOKED AT 300+ MILLION VOTES, AND FOUND LESS THAN 90, MOST WHO WERE FELONS WHO DIDN'T REALIZE THEY LOST THEIR RIGHTS, AND PROSECUTED ZERO PEOPLE FOR TAKING ANOTHER NAME AT THE POLL, THE ONLY TYPE OF FRAUD GOP VOTER ID RESTRICTION LAWS STOP???





YOUR LINK:




"Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES)."


Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


OOPS

A number of academics and commentators have already expressed skepticism about the paper’s assumptions and conclusions, though. In a series of tweets, New York Times columnist Nate Cohn focused his criticism on Richman et al’s use of Cooperative Congressional Election Study data to make inferences about the non-citizen voting population. That critique has some merit, too. The 2008 and 2010 CCES surveyed large opt-in Internet samples constructed by the polling firm YouGov to be nationally representative of the adult citizen population. Consequently, the assumption that non-citizens, who volunteered to take online surveys administered in English about American politics, would somehow be representative of the entire non-citizen population seems tenuous at best.

Perhaps a bigger problem with utilizing CCES data to make claims about the non-citizen voting in the United States is that some respondents might have mistakenly misreported their citizenship status on this survey (e.g. response error). For, as Richman et al. state in their Electoral Studies article, “If most or all of the ‘non-citizens’ who indicated that they voted were in fact citizens who accidentally misstated their citizenship status, then the data would have nothing to contribute concerning the frequency of non-citizen voting.” In fact, any response error in self-reported citizenship status could have substantially altered the authors’ conclusions because they were only able to validate the votes of five respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters in the 2008 CCES.

It turns out that such response error was common for self-reported non-citizens in the 2010-2012 CCES Panel Study — a survey that re-interviewed 19,533 respondents in 2012 who had currently participated in the 2010 CCES. The first table below, for instance, shows that nearly one-fifth of CCES panelists who said that they were not American citizens in 2012 actually reported being American citizens when they were originally surveyed for the 2010 CCES. Since it’s illogical for non-citizens in 2012 to have been American citizens back in 2010, it appears that a substantial number of self-reported non-citizens inaccurately reported their (non)citizenship status in the CCES surveys.



Even more problematic, misreported citizenship status was most common among respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters. The second table below shows that 41 percent of self-reported non-citizen voters in the 2012 CCES reported being citizens back in 2010. The table goes on to show that 71 percent of respondents, who said that they were both 2012 non-citizens and 2010 voters, had previously reported being citizens of the United States in the 2010 CCES. With the authors’ extrapolations of the non-citizen voting population based on a small number of validated votes from self-reported non-citizens (N = 5), this high frequency of response error in non-citizenship status raises important doubts about their conclusions.

Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


LOL

WEIRD HOW EVERY ELECTION CYCLE THIS BS COMES UP, ALWAYS DEBUNKED, BUT NEVER GOES AWAY FROM YOU DISHONEST POS'S!

 

[1stRambo]

Well with all the voter fraud and voting machines that "accidently" change your votes who the hell knows, but it seems no one gives a crap. so after that thug Obama you all deserve more of that and worse if you vote for the Democrats.

Fascism/Socialism/communism. enjoy it

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

Yo, Dunce, it doesn`t matter if it`s one voter fraud or one million? We have to show I.D. in everything we do, so I say I.D. the illegals!!! You know your girl Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to win an election, she is doing so bad!!!
So, if you don`t like the idea, tough shit, live with it!!!

It needs fixing, How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Read more at: Jaw-Dropping Study Claims Large Numbers of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. | National Review Online

"GTP"
View attachment 49020

REALLY? Restricting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS to stop one illegal vote is good fiscal policy? lol

Wait ANOTHER CONservative "study" CLAIMS there illegals REGISTERED TO VOTE? AND THEN THEY TURN IT AROUND TO SAY THEY ACTUALLY VOTE? lol


Dubya's DOJ FIVE YEAR UNPRECEDENTED INVESTIGATION, WHERE THEY FIRED PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T PLAY POLITICS WITH THE GOP, LOOKED AT 300+ MILLION VOTES, AND FOUND LESS THAN 90, MOST WHO WERE FELONS WHO DIDN'T REALIZE THEY LOST THEIR RIGHTS, AND PROSECUTED ZERO PEOPLE FOR TAKING ANOTHER NAME AT THE POLL, THE ONLY TYPE OF FRAUD GOP VOTER ID RESTRICTION LAWS STOP???





YOUR LINK:




"Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES)."


Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


OOPS

A number of academics and commentators have already expressed skepticism about the paper’s assumptions and conclusions, though. In a series of tweets, New York Times columnist Nate Cohn focused his criticism on Richman et al’s use of Cooperative Congressional Election Study data to make inferences about the non-citizen voting population. That critique has some merit, too. The 2008 and 2010 CCES surveyed large opt-in Internet samples constructed by the polling firm YouGov to be nationally representative of the adult citizen population. Consequently, the assumption that non-citizens, who volunteered to take online surveys administered in English about American politics, would somehow be representative of the entire non-citizen population seems tenuous at best.

Perhaps a bigger problem with utilizing CCES data to make claims about the non-citizen voting in the United States is that some respondents might have mistakenly misreported their citizenship status on this survey (e.g. response error). For, as Richman et al. state in their Electoral Studies article, “If most or all of the ‘non-citizens’ who indicated that they voted were in fact citizens who accidentally misstated their citizenship status, then the data would have nothing to contribute concerning the frequency of non-citizen voting.” In fact, any response error in self-reported citizenship status could have substantially altered the authors’ conclusions because they were only able to validate the votes of five respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters in the 2008 CCES.

It turns out that such response error was common for self-reported non-citizens in the 2010-2012 CCES Panel Study — a survey that re-interviewed 19,533 respondents in 2012 who had currently participated in the 2010 CCES. The first table below, for instance, shows that nearly one-fifth of CCES panelists who said that they were not American citizens in 2012 actually reported being American citizens when they were originally surveyed for the 2010 CCES. Since it’s illogical for non-citizens in 2012 to have been American citizens back in 2010, it appears that a substantial number of self-reported non-citizens inaccurately reported their (non)citizenship status in the CCES surveys.



Even more problematic, misreported citizenship status was most common among respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters. The second table below shows that 41 percent of self-reported non-citizen voters in the 2012 CCES reported being citizens back in 2010. The table goes on to show that 71 percent of respondents, who said that they were both 2012 non-citizens and 2010 voters, had previously reported being citizens of the United States in the 2010 CCES. With the authors’ extrapolations of the non-citizen voting population based on a small number of validated votes from self-reported non-citizens (N = 5), this high frequency of response error in non-citizenship status raises important doubts about their conclusions.

Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


LOL

WEIRD HOW EVERY ELECTION CYCLE THIS BS COMES UP, ALWAYS DEBUNKED, BUT NEVER GOES AWAY FROM YOU DISHONEST POS'S!

Yo, maybe one day you will get it? Doubt it!!!

"GTP"

 

[Dad2three]

Myth of Voter Fraud


It is important to protect the integrity of our elections. But we must be careful not to undermine free and fair access to the ballot in the name of preventing voter fraud.


The Brennan Center’s ongoing examination of voter fraud claims reveal that voter fraud is very rare, voter impersonation is nearly non-existent, and much of the problems associated with alleged fraud in elections relates to unintentional mistakes by voters or election administrators. Our report "The Truth About Voter Fraud" reveals most allegations of fraud turn out to be baseless — and that of the few allegations remaining, most reveal election irregularities and other forms of election misconduct. Click here for additional resources on fraud.

Voter fraud is not acceptable in our elections, but we must find a balance and not impose solutions that make it harder for millions of eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.


Myth of Voter Fraud



A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast


A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast





Paul Weyrich - "I don't want everybody to vote" (Goo Goo)




Paul Weyrich, "father" of the right-wing movement and co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, Moral Majority and various other groups tells his flock that he doesn't want people to vote. He complains that fellow Christians have "Goo-Goo Syndrome":

So many of our Christians have what I call the goo-goo syndrome: good government. They want everybody to vote. I don't want everybody to vote. Elections are not won by a majority of people, they never have been from the beginning of our country and they are not now. As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

Yo, Dunce, it doesn`t matter if it`s one voter fraud or one million? We have to show I.D. in everything we do, so I say I.D. the illegals!!! You know your girl Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to win an election, she is doing so bad!!!
So, if you don`t like the idea, tough shit, live with it!!!

It needs fixing, How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Read more at: Jaw-Dropping Study Claims Large Numbers of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. | National Review Online

"GTP"
View attachment 49020

REALLY? Restricting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS to stop one illegal vote is good fiscal policy? lol

Wait ANOTHER CONservative "study" CLAIMS there illegals REGISTERED TO VOTE? AND THEN THEY TURN IT AROUND TO SAY THEY ACTUALLY VOTE? lol


Dubya's DOJ FIVE YEAR UNPRECEDENTED INVESTIGATION, WHERE THEY FIRED PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T PLAY POLITICS WITH THE GOP, LOOKED AT 300+ MILLION VOTES, AND FOUND LESS THAN 90, MOST WHO WERE FELONS WHO DIDN'T REALIZE THEY LOST THEIR RIGHTS, AND PROSECUTED ZERO PEOPLE FOR TAKING ANOTHER NAME AT THE POLL, THE ONLY TYPE OF FRAUD GOP VOTER ID RESTRICTION LAWS STOP???





YOUR LINK:




"Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES)."


Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


OOPS

A number of academics and commentators have already expressed skepticism about the paper’s assumptions and conclusions, though. In a series of tweets, New York Times columnist Nate Cohn focused his criticism on Richman et al’s use of Cooperative Congressional Election Study data to make inferences about the non-citizen voting population. That critique has some merit, too. The 2008 and 2010 CCES surveyed large opt-in Internet samples constructed by the polling firm YouGov to be nationally representative of the adult citizen population. Consequently, the assumption that non-citizens, who volunteered to take online surveys administered in English about American politics, would somehow be representative of the entire non-citizen population seems tenuous at best.

Perhaps a bigger problem with utilizing CCES data to make claims about the non-citizen voting in the United States is that some respondents might have mistakenly misreported their citizenship status on this survey (e.g. response error). For, as Richman et al. state in their Electoral Studies article, “If most or all of the ‘non-citizens’ who indicated that they voted were in fact citizens who accidentally misstated their citizenship status, then the data would have nothing to contribute concerning the frequency of non-citizen voting.” In fact, any response error in self-reported citizenship status could have substantially altered the authors’ conclusions because they were only able to validate the votes of five respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters in the 2008 CCES.

It turns out that such response error was common for self-reported non-citizens in the 2010-2012 CCES Panel Study — a survey that re-interviewed 19,533 respondents in 2012 who had currently participated in the 2010 CCES. The first table below, for instance, shows that nearly one-fifth of CCES panelists who said that they were not American citizens in 2012 actually reported being American citizens when they were originally surveyed for the 2010 CCES. Since it’s illogical for non-citizens in 2012 to have been American citizens back in 2010, it appears that a substantial number of self-reported non-citizens inaccurately reported their (non)citizenship status in the CCES surveys.



Even more problematic, misreported citizenship status was most common among respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters. The second table below shows that 41 percent of self-reported non-citizen voters in the 2012 CCES reported being citizens back in 2010. The table goes on to show that 71 percent of respondents, who said that they were both 2012 non-citizens and 2010 voters, had previously reported being citizens of the United States in the 2010 CCES. With the authors’ extrapolations of the non-citizen voting population based on a small number of validated votes from self-reported non-citizens (N = 5), this high frequency of response error in non-citizenship status raises important doubts about their conclusions.

Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


LOL

WEIRD HOW EVERY ELECTION CYCLE THIS BS COMES UP, ALWAYS DEBUNKED, BUT NEVER GOES AWAY FROM YOU DISHONEST POS'S!

Yo, maybe one day you will get it? Doubt it!!!

"GTP"

Oh I got it Bubba, DEMOLISHED the right wing MYTH of voter fraud. I'd say it was a grand-slam actually!

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, you need to do a better job with your choice of truth?

1. Brennan Center for Justice
   Policy institute
2. The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School is a nonpartisan, left-leaning law and public policy institute. Wikipedia

"GTP"
View attachment 49012

New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed


A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.



In an exhaustive public records search, reporters from the investigative reporting projecdt News21 sent thousands of requests to elections officers in all 50 states, asking for every case of fraudulent activity including registration fraud, absentee ballot fraud, vote buying, false election counts, campaign fraud, casting an ineligible vote, voting twice, voter impersonation fraud and intimidation.

Analysis of the resulting comprehensive News21 election fraud database turned up 10 cases of voter impersonation. With 146 million registered voters in the United States during that time, those 10 cases represent one out of about every 15 million prospective voters.

“Voter fraud at the polls is an insignificant aspect of American elections,”


New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations



The Bush Justice Department conducted a massive, five-year (300+ million votes) investigation into voter fraud that resulted in a mere 86 convictions nationwide. An independent investigation into voter fraud in Missouri in 2000 determined that the rate of voter fraud in that state was 0.0003%. A similar study in Ohio in 2004 turned up a percentage of 0.0004%, while another study in Wisconsin the same year measured the proportion of fraudulent votes at 0.0002%.

Notably, in virtually every case the “fraudulent” votes involved either in- and out-of-state double voting or votes cast by ineligible voters, chiefly ex-felons, problems that would not be addressed by photo ID. None were cases of actual fraud via voter impersonation.




The Fraud of Voter Fraud

Yo, Dunce, it doesn`t matter if it`s one voter fraud or one million? We have to show I.D. in everything we do, so I say I.D. the illegals!!! You know your girl Hillary Clinton will do anything and everything to win an election, she is doing so bad!!!
So, if you don`t like the idea, tough shit, live with it!!!

It needs fixing, How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.

Read more at: Jaw-Dropping Study Claims Large Numbers of Non-Citizens Vote in U.S. | National Review Online

"GTP"
View attachment 49020

REALLY? Restricting HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS to stop one illegal vote is good fiscal policy? lol

Wait ANOTHER CONservative "study" CLAIMS there illegals REGISTERED TO VOTE? AND THEN THEY TURN IT AROUND TO SAY THEY ACTUALLY VOTE? lol


Dubya's DOJ FIVE YEAR UNPRECEDENTED INVESTIGATION, WHERE THEY FIRED PROSECUTORS BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T PLAY POLITICS WITH THE GOP, LOOKED AT 300+ MILLION VOTES, AND FOUND LESS THAN 90, MOST WHO WERE FELONS WHO DIDN'T REALIZE THEY LOST THEIR RIGHTS, AND PROSECUTED ZERO PEOPLE FOR TAKING ANOTHER NAME AT THE POLL, THE ONLY TYPE OF FRAUD GOP VOTER ID RESTRICTION LAWS STOP???





YOUR LINK:




"Our data comes from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES)."


Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


OOPS

A number of academics and commentators have already expressed skepticism about the paper’s assumptions and conclusions, though. In a series of tweets, New York Times columnist Nate Cohn focused his criticism on Richman et al’s use of Cooperative Congressional Election Study data to make inferences about the non-citizen voting population. That critique has some merit, too. The 2008 and 2010 CCES surveyed large opt-in Internet samples constructed by the polling firm YouGov to be nationally representative of the adult citizen population. Consequently, the assumption that non-citizens, who volunteered to take online surveys administered in English about American politics, would somehow be representative of the entire non-citizen population seems tenuous at best.

Perhaps a bigger problem with utilizing CCES data to make claims about the non-citizen voting in the United States is that some respondents might have mistakenly misreported their citizenship status on this survey (e.g. response error). For, as Richman et al. state in their Electoral Studies article, “If most or all of the ‘non-citizens’ who indicated that they voted were in fact citizens who accidentally misstated their citizenship status, then the data would have nothing to contribute concerning the frequency of non-citizen voting.” In fact, any response error in self-reported citizenship status could have substantially altered the authors’ conclusions because they were only able to validate the votes of five respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters in the 2008 CCES.

It turns out that such response error was common for self-reported non-citizens in the 2010-2012 CCES Panel Study — a survey that re-interviewed 19,533 respondents in 2012 who had currently participated in the 2010 CCES. The first table below, for instance, shows that nearly one-fifth of CCES panelists who said that they were not American citizens in 2012 actually reported being American citizens when they were originally surveyed for the 2010 CCES. Since it’s illogical for non-citizens in 2012 to have been American citizens back in 2010, it appears that a substantial number of self-reported non-citizens inaccurately reported their (non)citizenship status in the CCES surveys.



Even more problematic, misreported citizenship status was most common among respondents who claimed to be non-citizen voters. The second table below shows that 41 percent of self-reported non-citizen voters in the 2012 CCES reported being citizens back in 2010. The table goes on to show that 71 percent of respondents, who said that they were both 2012 non-citizens and 2010 voters, had previously reported being citizens of the United States in the 2010 CCES. With the authors’ extrapolations of the non-citizen voting population based on a small number of validated votes from self-reported non-citizens (N = 5), this high frequency of response error in non-citizenship status raises important doubts about their conclusions.

Methodological challenges affect study of non-citizens’ voting


LOL

WEIRD HOW EVERY ELECTION CYCLE THIS BS COMES UP, ALWAYS DEBUNKED, BUT NEVER GOES AWAY FROM YOU DISHONEST POS'S!

Yo, maybe one day you will get it? Doubt it!!!

"GTP"

Oh I got it Bubba, DEMOLISHED the right wing MYTH of voter fraud. I'd say it was a grand-slam actually!

Yo, this Country was made by Laws, get use to it!

"GTP"

 

[blackhawk]