Winston
Platinum Member
So I guess he was gonna die of a heart attack anyway.
We have 35% to 40% of our population thinking this stuff.
And we wonder why we can't get it under control.
They don't care how much they spread it in the name of the "liberty" or how many they kill.
Did he die of the Wuhan Red Death, or of a heart attack, dunce?
What are the chances of dying of the Wuhan?
And as far as how disastrous the Wuhan is to folks without those underlying co-morbidities, quick review of the facts: If one gets the Wuhan, the chances of dying from it approach zero….no more than a rounding error in the data.
An elderly, overweight President had it, and ten days later is doing two hours-long rallies a day.
Hill reporter Joe Consha said the following on Fox. 10/6:
"The CDC said that between the ages of zero and 19, 99.97% of people survive the Wuhan.
....between 20 and 45, 99.98%
....between 50 and 65, 99.5%
....and over 70, about 95%.
Yet it served as the Democrat's reason to destroy the economy.
Look, I have seen you make this mistake time and time again. It was not the risk of death that necessitated the precautions that have been enacted, like wearing masks, social distancing, and the closing down of businesses or limiting the hours. It was not done to stop the spread of the disease. It was done for one reason, and one reason alone. To prevent the hospital system from being overran by slowing down the spread of the disease.
And the whole co-morbidity obsession is disingenuous at best, total ignorance at worse. In your case, I am going with total ignorance. If someone has stage 4 lung cancer and is killed in a car wreck, do we say they died from lung cancer? Of course not, and Covid-19 is no different.