Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,506
- 2,250
So?I should have started you with the process of analyzing an article...Perhaps I called you a moron because you're constantly following your emotions and never following facts.Ask
Ask yourself why you are spending time posting ad hominems and not analyzing the article.My impression of you comes in only one form...QUOTE="joaquinmiller, post: 24514453, member: 45560"]
Brietbart is a GW loving, neo-Con piece of shit.Yeah, because a reporter being called on the phone by some informer isn't anecdotal!I personally know nurses working in NYC hospitals and no reports of death.
![]()
Nurses read names of colleagues who died of COVID-19 in protest outside White House
National Nurses United organized the protest to call attention to the thousands of health care workers who were infected by the coronavirus.www.usatoday.com
Why can't you look this up yourself?
And spoil anecdotal testimony? WTF!
Life being stranger than fiction, reporters actually do attempt to check facts, Brietbart notwithstanding, and they frequently offer anecdotes in the guise of, 'according to' or 'she said'. Anecdotes relay a narrative, not a fact.
You believe every report you get that "some unidentified person" working in an institution called "an honest and responsible person" to report to a Click Hungry media outlet that something happened that makes Trump evil.
That's called an anecdote, you moron.
That's called your stupid fucking opinion, dummy.
[/QUOTE
It's called a factual sequence of that you ignore because you hate Trump.
Take a piece of paper and draw a flow chart from every article you read and describe every box, including who said what to whom.
If that doesn't tell you what is fact and what is hate, that's your problem, not my problem.
You do it. It's your claim, and it has nothing to do with me, other than I think Trump is unfit for the office he holds. I don't hate him, although I certainly don't respect or admire him.
I do get tired of people trying to assign negative motivations to me and others. I didn't think you were lying when you said you didn't know any nurses who had died. I just thought that personal tidbit wasn't particularly relevant to the big picture. I do now think you're an irritating little dick.
What you post.
I am irritating to people who don't me pointing out their inability to communicate facts withing context.
That's why you consider me an irritating little dick.
I'm pleased that I show others with an IQ above 0 how you are persuaded by nonsense.
You think you've done that? Really? Well, no praise like self-praise, I suppose.
If you want to look back at who called who a moron first, help yourself. It may increase your self-awareness. Also, ascribing my motivations to hatred is a personal attack. If you want to swap insults, I can do that.
That's a attribute of a moron.
There is room for you to improve; you must be willing to leave the state of you being a moron behind.
And no, you can't swap insults with me because emotional people have a limited range of wit.
All I have to do to insult you is point out how you would fail the reading comprehension section of the SAT.
Perhaps you called me a moron because you're a moron. And perhaps you forgot you started the insults because you're a moron with a poor memory, or a moron lacking awareness. Perhaps you accuse me of 'hating' due to limited imagination or intelligence.
Reading comprehension? Yeah, go with that.
The source and what that source is reporting.
The destination and gains from the source.
Is the source and responsibilities clearly communicated.
Why the recipient of the information is interested,
What purpose does the story accomplish, emotional, information, remedial.
Are any of the parties adept at the subject being discussed.
You asked for a link. It was provided to you, and then ignored because you personally know nurses in NYC. Evidence isn't accepted.
I take an article from many outlets and ask if it’s bulllshit.