More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
DecadelTempAnom1880-200.jpg

Surface temperature each decade since 1880 compared to the twentieth-century (1901-2000) average (dashed line at zero). Each of the last three decades was the warmest on record at the time, and each was warmer than the last. Data courtesy of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center.
Bullshit chart. Been telling you almost daily. They admit it. And you keep posting it as valid.total fail!
 
DecadelTempAnom1880-200.jpg

Surface temperature each decade since 1880 compared to the twentieth-century (1901-2000) average (dashed line at zero). Each of the last three decades was the warmest on record at the time, and each was warmer than the last. Data courtesy of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center.
Bullshit chart. Been telling you almost daily. They admit it. And you keep posting it as valid.total fail!
you keep calling it bll shit but provide no other supporting evidence...you are another nobody....let me see trust NOAA or trust you or the other dummy LOL tough choice LOL
 
DecadelTempAnom1880-200.jpg

Surface temperature each decade since 1880 compared to the twentieth-century (1901-2000) average (dashed line at zero). Each of the last three decades was the warmest on record at the time, and each was warmer than the last. Data courtesy of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center.
Bullshit chart. Been telling you almost daily. They admit it. And you keep posting it as valid.total fail!
you keep calling it bll shit but provide no other supporting evidence...you are another nobody....let me see trust NOAA or trust you or the other dummy LOL tough choice LOL
Dude, they own the raw data. I've been asking for it. You know right?
 
oceanprofile_tempBalmaseda1960-2008.jpg

Yearly global ocean heat content compared to the 1958-65 average (dashed line at zero) for the past four decades for different layers of the ocean: from the surface to depths of 300 meters (grey) and 700 meters (blue), and total depth down to 2,000 meters (purple). Surface waters warmed more slowly (line is nearly flat since the mid-2000s) than deeper waters (steep increase). Since the core of the Argo fleet can only dive down to 2,000 meters, the amount of heat going into the deep ocean is unknown. Image adapted from Figure 1 of Balmaseda et al., 2013 (pdf).
 
oceanprofile_tempBalmaseda1960-2008.jpg

Yearly global ocean heat content compared to the 1958-65 average (dashed line at zero) for the past four decades for different layers of the ocean: from the surface to depths of 300 meters (grey) and 700 meters (blue), and total depth down to 2,000 meters (purple). Surface waters warmed more slowly (line is nearly flat since the mid-2000s) than deeper waters (steep increase). Since the core of the Argo fleet can only dive down to 2,000 meters, the amount of heat going into the deep ocean is unknown. Image adapted from Figure 1 of Balmaseda et al., 2013 (pdf).


Newer!

lyT3mMw.jpg
 
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...

Wahhhh Wahhh Wahhh.

The NOAA is defrauding you and you're an eager patsy

The Chart is total crap, fake, a fugazi.
 
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...

Wahhhh Wahhh Wahhh.

The NOAA is defrauding you and you're an eager patsy

The Chart is total crap, fake, a fugazi.


So you hate people that are educated in the field and spend their lives seeking to advance our knowledge? Right??? How are they defrauding you??? You really think we'd be a world power without investing in science. Hahaha,,,sounds like what the isis is doing.
 
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...

Wahhhh Wahhh Wahhh.

The NOAA is defrauding you and you're an eager patsy

The Chart is total crap, fake, a fugazi.


So you hate people that are educated in the field and spend their lives seeking to advance our knowledge? Right??? How are they defrauding you??? You really think we'd be a world power without investing in science. Hahaha,,,sounds like what the isis is doing.

Matty, how is CO2 heating the Sun, you never specified that.
 
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...

Wahhhh Wahhh Wahhh.

The NOAA is defrauding you and you're an eager patsy

The Chart is total crap, fake, a fugazi.


So you hate people that are educated in the field and spend their lives seeking to advance our knowledge? Right??? How are they defrauding you??? You really think we'd be a world power without investing in science. Hahaha,,,sounds like what the isis is doing.
I hate people who are lying. And that is what is happening. Again,, they admit it. Why don't you go read about it. They've hypnotized you. That makes you a fool!
 
oceanprofile_tempBalmaseda1960-2008.jpg

Yearly global ocean heat content compared to the 1958-65 average (dashed line at zero) for the past four decades for different layers of the ocean: from the surface to depths of 300 meters (grey) and 700 meters (blue), and total depth down to 2,000 meters (purple). Surface waters warmed more slowly (line is nearly flat since the mid-2000s) than deeper waters (steep increase). Since the core of the Argo fleet can only dive down to 2,000 meters, the amount of heat going into the deep ocean is unknown. Image adapted from Figure 1 of Balmaseda et al., 2013 (pdf).

Yeah, you want to walk us through the math of how it's at all possible under the laws of physics that a wisp of CO2 is "Heating the oceans" you Rube, you tard, you sucker
 
Matt, come on, Matt, all that money spent on Climate research, tell us how a wisp of CO2 heats the oceans
 
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...
It's still a total bullshit chart
and you are still a nobody pretending under a pseudonym that you have more authority and more science that NOAA...you do not have any credibility of any kind ...when a storm threatens they go to NOAA sites not to you...

Wahhhh Wahhh Wahhh.

The NOAA is defrauding you and you're an eager patsy

The Chart is total crap, fake, a fugazi.


So you hate people that are educated in the field and spend their lives seeking to advance our knowledge? Right??? How are they defrauding you??? You really think we'd be a world power without investing in science. Hahaha,,,sounds like what the isis is doing.

Matty, how is CO2 heating the Sun, you never specified that.


It doesn't...Co2 is a greenhouse gas that traps Ir radiation from going into space! I never said that it had anything to do with the sun. lol
 
oceanprofile_tempBalmaseda1960-2008.jpg

Yearly global ocean heat content compared to the 1958-65 average (dashed line at zero) for the past four decades for different layers of the ocean: from the surface to depths of 300 meters (grey) and 700 meters (blue), and total depth down to 2,000 meters (purple). Surface waters warmed more slowly (line is nearly flat since the mid-2000s) than deeper waters (steep increase). Since the core of the Argo fleet can only dive down to 2,000 meters, the amount of heat going into the deep ocean is unknown. Image adapted from Figure 1 of Balmaseda et al., 2013 (pdf).

Yeah, you want to walk us through the math of how it's at all possible under the laws of physics that a wisp of CO2 is "Heating the oceans" you Rube, you tard, you sucker


Green house effect sucker that is backed by at least 3 equations of physics!!! Water takes up most of the energy in the same way as it takes it a hell of a lot longer for it to cool or warm then the land.
 
Matt, come on, Matt, all that money spent on Climate research, tell us how a wisp of CO2 heats the oceans


Read up on the green house effect
. If you believe the suns solar input is causing it then please show me the HUGE increase in solar energy!!!

Matt, it takes 4 times the energy to heat water than it does air. The CO2 wasn't warming the air for 2 decades, so you guys decided to double down, actually quadruple down on a losing bet and now say the ocean ate your global warming.

It's a fucking fraud
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top