skookerasbil
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #5,341
Who's not winning?
Munch
![popcorn :popcorn: :popcorn:](/styles/smilies/popcorn.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.
"As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.
According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:"
Damn!
"In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified.It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU."
A damning report! They show collusion of all agencies and intentional deception.. And they did with the empirically observed facts...
On how profoundly inaccurate the climate models are >>>
http://www.eng.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Climate%20model%20results/over%20estimate.pdf
NOAA’s Climate.gov Says Natural Wetlands, Tropical Agriculture Responsible For Methane Increases, Not Oil and Gas
Now NOAA is admitting that methane increase is primarily caused by increased biomass AFTER cyclical and natural warming cycles... I wonder if they realize this opens the door to CO2 also being almost 100% natural variation as well...
LMAO.....
The wheels have fallen off the CAGW wagon...
“A necessary condition for the theory of anthropogenic global warming isthat there should be a close correlation between annual fluctuations of atmospheric CO2 and the annual rate of anthropogenic CO2 emissions.Data on atmospheric CO2 and anthropogenic emissions provided by the Mauna Loa measuring station and the CDIAC in the period 1959-2011 were studied using detrended correlation analysis to determine whether, net of their common long term upward trends, the rate of change in atmospheric CO2 is responsive to the rate of anthropogenic emissions in a shorter time scale from year to year. … [R]esults do not indicate a measurable year to year effect of annual anthropogenicemissions on the annual rate of CO2 accumulation in the atmosphere.”
Conclusion:
“There exist a clear phase relationship between changes of atmospheric CO2 and the different global temperature records, whetherrepresenting sea surface temperature, surface air temperature, or lower troposphere temperature, with changes in the amount of atmospheric CO2 always lagging behind corresponding changes in temperature.”
(1) The overall global temperature change sequence of events appears to be from 1) the ocean surface to 2) the land surface to 3) the lower troposphere.
(2) Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 11–12 months behind changes in global sea surface temperature.
(3) Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging 9.5–10 months behind changes in global air surface temperature.
(4) Changes in global atmospheric CO2 are lagging about 9 months behind changes in global lower troposphere temperature.
(5) Changes in ocean temperatures appear to explain a substantial part of the observed changes in atmospheric CO2 since January 1980.
(6) CO2 released from anthropogenic sources apparently has little influence on the observed changes in atmospheric CO2, and changes in atmospheric CO2 are not tracking changes in human emissions.
(7) On the time scale investigated, the overriding effect of large volcanic eruptions appears to be a reduction of atmospheric CO2, presumably due to the dominance of associated cooling effects from clouds associated with volcanic gases/aerosols and volcanic debris.
(8) Since at least 1980 changes in global temperature, and presumably especially southern ocean temperature, appear to represent a major control on changes in atmospheric CO2.
And it goes on and on...observation simply does not jibe with predictions..models have experienced failure after failure because the physics upon which they are based are terribly flawed.
Snooks, another Sunday and still the warmers are taking Russia and not climate. I'd say, the climate rouse is over, replaced by Russia Russia
yessireee.Snooks, another Sunday and still the warmers are taking Russia and not climate. I'd say, the climate rouse is over, replaced by Russia Russia
Hey JC........wtf? I thought coal was dead.......didn't you??
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Coal/US-Coal-Finds-Footing-In-European-Markets.html
Russia.......only the unicorn chasers ae interested............![]()
Togwaatee pass, North slope still has massive amounts of snow. this was taken just last week. Some north slope valleys still have over 20' of the white stuff and there is no way it will melt off now in the next two weeks with night time temps well below freezing.according to NASA data, in 2016 and 2017, sea levels are FALLING..........
Sea levels are falling - Ice Age Now
Who's not winning??![]()