What does "Who's not winning" have to do with science?
Do you think the GLOBAL CLIMATE takes a poll to decide what it will do?
Ummm.........how about everything s0n!!!
Reads like magical thinking,, but perhaps you'll be kind enough to connect the dots for me.
Its posts like this that prove my point.
The "point" in contention is your apparent theory that the CLIMATE is decided by who wins elections.
I'm asking you to show me how that works.
Can you?
Before you are allowed to post on this message board, you should have to show minimum competence in the area of Civics.
Oh I see, now CIVICS is the determinant factor to climate? Again, please show us the mechanizm that makes that happen.
Now.......I guess there is a possiblitly that some view global climate as just like a hobby where you kick around data figures and shoot the shit about the heat and glaciers. IDK.......thats about as useful as us all getting together and contemplating on our navels = the perfect analogy.
I don't really have a POV on climate change.
But I definitely DO have a POV about whether the outcomes of elections manifest as climate change. I think they are not related events.
You apprently disagree.
I'm asking you to show me how that works.
Anyway........in some cases, making an effort at schooling the hoplessly naive is hardly worth it.For sure, Old Rocks knows exactly what I mean!!!
![]()
I'm waiting for your argument about how the outcomes of elections change climate.
Your opions about me or OR, while fascinating to you, I suppose, is not really of much interest to me.
I am however, curious to see how your mind works in regard to your assertion that climate is an ourcome of political elections.