More than 90 Muslims, nearly all Democrats, running for public office across the U.S.

[longknife]

Exactly what principles of the US Constitution does not wanting to bake a cake go against?

The whole principle of Human Rights....

BS

Well, I'm not going to explain something as basic as Human Rights to someone who can't even use words in a post.

Please show us ANYWHERE in the constitution where it says Human Rights.

You want me to show you where there are human rights in the Constitution?

Are you that fucking ignorant of the US Constitution?

Do you also want me to show you where it say "We" in the Constitution?

I would love to have you clearly point out where Human Rights are included in the constitution.

What the hell does "We the people" have to do with your convoluted concept?

 

[frigidweirdo]

The whole principle of Human Rights....

BS

Well, I'm not going to explain something as basic as Human Rights to someone who can't even use words in a post.

Please show us ANYWHERE in the constitution where it says Human Rights.

You want me to show you where there are human rights in the Constitution?

Are you that fucking ignorant of the US Constitution?

Do you also want me to show you where it say "We" in the Constitution?

I would love to have you clearly point out where Human Rights are included in the constitution.

What the hell does "We the people" have to do with your convoluted concept?

Fucking hell.

Human Rights started their process towards acceptance with the Magna Carta in the UK in 1215.

By the 17th Century they were developing more along the lines of what we know today. John Locke was a prominent philosopher and had them down as something like "life, liberty and estate"

In 1689 the English Bill of Rights came into being. It didn't grant rights, or assume rights or however you wish to see rights as existing in the sense that they exist today, they were more for the richer sections of society.

The English Bill of Rights, like the Magna Carta before it, were power plays by people against the Monarch of England.

Some of the ideas in the English Bill of Rights were adapted by the US Constitution in 1791.

First Amendment:

"it is the right of the subjects to petition the king"

"the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;"

Second Amendment

"Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;"

Fifth Amendment

""excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;"

For example.

In the Americas the people wanted to take more power away from the King of England, and when they finally gained freedom these ideas were at the fore of politics.

The protection of such rights became the Bill of Rights.

Is this enough of a History lesson for you?

 

[joaquinmiller]

And the Confederate flag wavers are compatible with the US Constitution?

Yes they are! Now you are saying that Sharia Law is compatible with the US Constitution?

Sharia Law is every bit as compatible as the Christian version thereof. In other words, neither one has any place in our system of governance.

This is probably exactly what it's going to take to cleanse this far right, fundamentalist Christian mess out.

Give me a few examples of your supposed Christian Version of Sharia Law that is on the books, Is some one forcing you not to eat meat on Friday or go to Chirch on Sunday? Or do you mean the old blue laws where you cannot by beer before noon on Sunday?

The easiest one is gay people and marriage.

Bakers not wanting to bake cakes for gay marriages goes against the principles of the US Constitution, yet the right are trying to force this into being law.

Exactly what principles of the US Constitution does not wanting to bake a cake go against?

If a single group is singled out for exclusion, it violates the equal protection clause.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Abuse Of Terms Through Undisclosed Meaning "

* Bifurcated Unresolved Inner Conflict *

" Loitering And Waiting To Entreat Megalomaniac Hysteria Inspired From Supremacist Demagogues "
* His Bah Means Disregarding Yearn Beliefs *
Whether or not such accusations are true , they are irrelevant in light of the left having a split mind in the following regard .
The left mind is split between defending the benevolent and defenseless , and also remaining intolerant to instigators of intolerance .
The left cannot discern between those invoking self defense against the doctrine of fictional ishmaelism and against it tenets granting credence to provocateurs for intolerance including violence whenever superior , and the defense of fictional ishmaelism adherents as benevolent and defenseless by preposterous virtue of some minority status .
Indeed , the left chooses to tout that us constitution assures fictional ishmaelism adherents are not defenseless , but assuredly the fictional ishmaelism doctrine is not benevolent towards individual liberty , as it lauds for hisbah through democracy as tyranny by majority , even including passive advocacy for violence as according to its doctrine , whenever they are superior .

If I'm translating this convoluted gibberish correctly, you are, in effect calling us hypocrites for supporting LGBT rights while also advocating for Muslims. Whether or not all Muslims are hostile to LGBT people- and I don't believe that they are - you are perpetrating an egregious logical fallacy as follows:

The left was not being called hypocrites directly for being tolerant of intolerance which cannot be extricated from the fictional ishmaelism doctrine , as hypocrisy is much more closely related to an intentional act .

The left has a split mind meaning that it is incapable of identifying fictional ishmaelism as an abhorration , as not benevolent , because it cannot over ride its objective ignorance to grant the fictional ishmaelism status as defenseless and benevolent by virtue of them being a minority .

It would be synonymous with a belief from the left that ku klux klan should be defended based upon minority status as not all of them are willing to commit violence although their ideology is separatist , sectarian , supremacist and intolerant by doctrine .

Consider how the militant megalomaniac mu ham madd focused in on the general disposition of people as peaceful and passive to foment them to aggression .

2:194. [Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all] violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear God and know that God is with those who fear Him.

2:216. Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And God knows, while you know not.

2:217. They ask you about the sacred month - about fighting therein. Say, “Fighting therein is great [sin], but averting [people] from the way of God and disbelief in Him and [preventing access to] al-Masjid al-Harām and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of God. And fitnah is greater than killing.” And they will continue to fight you until they turn you back from your religion if they are able. And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever - for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the
companions of the Fire; they will abide therein eternally.

2:278 O you who have believed, fear God and give up what remains [due to you] of interest, if you should be believers.

2:279 And if you do not, then be informed of a war [against you] from God and His Messenger. But if you repent, you may have your principal - [thus] you do no wrong, nor are you wronged.

Assuming you have read the excerpts from surah 2 that in part addresses ramadan , where their adherents are told to fight those who fight them only for that month when otherwise the hate speech militant manifesto of surah 9 prevails that was written 113th out of 114 in chronology and is the basis for 1400 years to instigate aggression by doctrine , where otherwise the fictional ishmaelism adherent forwards ram a dan as a time to reflect on commitments and their sheeple do not disclose and perhaps do not understand the actual implications , such that , why would any non believer celebrate eid al fitter , which is an end to a temporary armistice ?

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

As if the Muslim world sat placidly by...spare me.

No, they are doing EXACTLY what anyone would do when a bunch of foreigners invade their country.

So let's try "not invading their countries" for a change.

The Muslim world is a direct result of Muslim conquest...conversion by the sword...Karma is a MFer.

The Crusades weren't fought in Europe, although cross-wearing European Christians were the aggressors.

Oh Jesus...you fucking clowns and your crusade references. WTF do you think the CRUSADES were a reaction to? Hmmm? Do you think it was a reaction to the hoards of Muslims slaying, raping and enslaving people or force converting them across the known world?
Do you understand the sheer numbers that were murdered in the forst 500 years of Islam? Do you understand the sheer scope of the Islamic slave trade over the centuries?
Crusades..'thumbs vag' Crusades....muh crusades.

 

[joaquinmiller]

As if the Muslim world sat placidly by...spare me.

No, they are doing EXACTLY what anyone would do when a bunch of foreigners invade their country.

So let's try "not invading their countries" for a change.

The Muslim world is a direct result of Muslim conquest...conversion by the sword...Karma is a MFer.

The Crusades weren't fought in Europe, although cross-wearing European Christians were the aggressors.

Oh Jesus...you fucking clowns and your crusade references. WTF do you think the CRUSADES were a reaction to? Hmmm? Do you think it was a reaction to the hoards of Muslims slaying, raping and enslaving people or force converting them across the known world?
Do you understand the sheer numbers that were murdered in the forst 500 years of Islam? Do you understand the sheer scope of the Islamic slave trade over the centuries?
Crusades..'thumbs vag' Crusades....muh crusades.

Are you trying to say European Christians didn't suit up and trek off to the Holy Lands? Or were you thinking Christians had given up slavery at that point? Maybe you were thinking the Inquisition wasn't going on at the same time. Or maybe you're just the Zombie Fucking Apocalypse.

 

[Desperado]

Yes they are! Now you are saying that Sharia Law is compatible with the US Constitution?

Sharia Law is every bit as compatible as the Christian version thereof. In other words, neither one has any place in our system of governance.

This is probably exactly what it's going to take to cleanse this far right, fundamentalist Christian mess out.

Give me a few examples of your supposed Christian Version of Sharia Law that is on the books, Is some one forcing you not to eat meat on Friday or go to Chirch on Sunday? Or do you mean the old blue laws where you cannot by beer before noon on Sunday?

The easiest one is gay people and marriage.

Bakers not wanting to bake cakes for gay marriages goes against the principles of the US Constitution, yet the right are trying to force this into being law.

Exactly what principles of the US Constitution does not wanting to bake a cake go against?

If a single group is singled out for exclusion, it violates the equal protection clause.

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. The 14th Amendment is not by its terms applicable to the federal government.
It prohibits states not bakeries from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. In other words it is a law for the states to obey

 

[Synthaholic]

More than 90 American Muslims, nearly all of them Democrats, are running for public office across the country this year

You brought this on with your extreme politics. Now let’s see how many we Liberals can get elected!

 

[joaquinmiller]

Sharia Law is every bit as compatible as the Christian version thereof. In other words, neither one has any place in our system of governance.

This is probably exactly what it's going to take to cleanse this far right, fundamentalist Christian mess out.

Give me a few examples of your supposed Christian Version of Sharia Law that is on the books, Is some one forcing you not to eat meat on Friday or go to Chirch on Sunday? Or do you mean the old blue laws where you cannot by beer before noon on Sunday?

The easiest one is gay people and marriage.

Bakers not wanting to bake cakes for gay marriages goes against the principles of the US Constitution, yet the right are trying to force this into being law.

Exactly what principles of the US Constitution does not wanting to bake a cake go against?

If a single group is singled out for exclusion, it violates the equal protection clause.

The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits states from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. The 14th Amendment is not by its terms applicable to the federal government.
It prohibits states not backeries from denying any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law

And applies to businesses licensed by the State(s). If you're talking about an unlicensed Granny working out of her kitchen, no sweat. To test your position, ask if it would be illegal to deny service to potential black customers, or Jewish customers.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Calling christianity a political movement like islam, is iscorrect. You could have a better argument with judaism. Even then, it doesnt compare to the scale islam has in shaping a muslims entire world.

Throughout American history Christianity has been injected into our political system. How do you think we ended up with so many so called "blue laws?" For instance, there are still places where alcohol sales are prohibited on Sundays because it's the Lord's day. People complaining about Muslims getting elected aren't concerned about religion in government; they are concerned about someone else's religion in government.

When someone else’s religion includes shariah law, gross abuse of women, minorities, gays, trans and non Muslims NOW - it’s quite reasonable to be concerned about the someone else’s ‘religion’ infiltrating government and exerting influence politically. Perfectly reasonable, imo.

And we all know just how much you care about gays, and trans You just hate Muslims just a little more and dishonestly use GBT issues to attack them when you do not give a shit,and are, in fact hostile to LGBT people

Let's see if I've got this right.

You support those who throw gays off of rooftops, and Tilly has never said anything against gay people, therefore SHE is the one supporting homophobia?

We certainly do live in an Orwellian world, here, folks.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

" Abuse Of Terms Through Undisclosed Meaning "

* Bifurcated Unresolved Inner Conflict *

" Loitering And Waiting To Entreat Megalomaniac Hysteria Inspired From Supremacist Demagogues "
* His Bah Means Disregarding Yearn Beliefs *
Whether or not such accusations are true , they are irrelevant in light of the left having a split mind in the following regard .
The left mind is split between defending the benevolent and defenseless , and also remaining intolerant to instigators of intolerance .
The left cannot discern between those invoking self defense against the doctrine of fictional ishmaelism and against it tenets granting credence to provocateurs for intolerance including violence whenever superior , and the defense of fictional ishmaelism adherents as benevolent and defenseless by preposterous virtue of some minority status .
Indeed , the left chooses to tout that us constitution assures fictional ishmaelism adherents are not defenseless , but assuredly the fictional ishmaelism doctrine is not benevolent towards individual liberty , as it lauds for hisbah through democracy as tyranny by majority , even including passive advocacy for violence as according to its doctrine , whenever they are superior .

If I'm translating this convoluted gibberish correctly, you are, in effect calling us hypocrites for supporting LGBT rights while also advocating for Muslims. Whether or not all Muslims are hostile to LGBT people- and I don't believe that they are - you are perpetrating an egregious logical fallacy as follows:

The left was not being called hypocrites directly for being tolerant of intolerance which cannot be extricated from the fictional ishmaelism doctrine , as hypocrisy is much more closely related to an intentional act .

The left has a split mind meaning that it is incapable of identifying fictional ishmaelism as an abhorration , as not benevolent , because it cannot over ride its objective ignorance to grant the fictional ishmaelism status as defenseless and benevolent by virtue of them being a minority .

It would be synonymous with a belief from the left that ku klux klan should be defended based upon minority status as not all of them are willing to commit violence although their ideology is separatist , sectarian , supremacist and intolerant by doctrine .

Consider how the militant megalomaniac mu ham madd focused in on the general disposition of people as peaceful and passive to foment them to aggression .

2:194. [Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all] violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear God and know that God is with those who fear Him.

2:216. Fighting has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and perhaps you love a thing and it is bad for you. And God knows, while you know not.

2:217. They ask you about the sacred month - about fighting therein. Say, “Fighting therein is great [sin], but averting [people] from the way of God and disbelief in Him and [preventing access to] al-Masjid al-Harām and the expulsion of its people therefrom are greater [evil] in the sight of God. And fitnah is greater than killing.” And they will continue to fight you until they turn you back from your religion if they are able. And whoever of you reverts from his religion [to disbelief] and dies while he is a disbeliever - for those, their deeds have become worthless in this world and the Hereafter, and those are the
companions of the Fire; they will abide therein eternally.

2:278 O you who have believed, fear God and give up what remains [due to you] of interest, if you should be believers.

2:279 And if you do not, then be informed of a war [against you] from God and His Messenger. But if you repent, you may have your principal - [thus] you do no wrong, nor are you wronged.

Assuming you have read the excerpts from surah 2 that in part addresses ramadan , where their adherents are told to fight those who fight them only for that month when otherwise the hate speech militant manifesto of surah 9 prevails that was written 113th out of 114 in chronology and is the basis for 1400 years to instigate aggression by doctrine , where otherwise the fictional ishmaelism adherent forwards ram a dan as a time to reflect on commitments and their sheeple do not disclose and perhaps do not understand the actual implications , such that , why would any non believer celebrate eid al fitter , which is an end to a temporary armistice ?

Clearly we are not speaking the same language. Spare me the biblical blather and horseshit about the left's mind.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

More than 90 American Muslims, nearly all of them Democrats, are running for public office across the country this year

You brought this on with your extreme politics. Now let’s see how many we Liberals can get elected!

You are a regressive, not a liberal.

If you were liberal, you would oppose the very least liberal ideology on the planet rather than supporting it as you are doing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This should be a warning to all Americans. They must remember that Islam is not a religion, it is a political movement to dominate everything around it.

More than 90 American Muslims, nearly all of them Democrats, are running for public office across the country this year. Many are young and politically inexperienced, and most are long shots. But they represent a collective gamble: that voters are so disgusted by America’s least popular president on record that they’re willing to elect members of America’s least popular religious minority group.

Although their number seems small, the candidacies mark an unprecedented rise for the nation’s diverse Muslim community that typically has been underrepresented in American politics.

One only has to look at what elected Muslims have done in the UK.

More of this alarming news @ The blue Muslim wave: American Muslims launch political campaigns, hope to deliver ‘sweet justice’ to Trump

Sharia here we come...

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Fictional Ishmaelism Angst For Failing To Conquer Europe "

* Vernacular of Historical Blubbering *

Are you trying to say European Christians didn't suit up and trek off to the Holy Lands? Or were you thinking Christians had given up slavery at that point? Maybe you were thinking the Inquisition wasn't going on at the same time. Or maybe you're just the Zombie Fucking Apocalypse.

Fictional ishmaelism had been running amok for 400 years prior to the first crusade .

As martin luther related , a war in the name of christianity is antithetical , even though lords and kings may implement a military to secure the freedom of their peoples .

In contrast , war in the name of fictional ishmaelism is expected .

47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if God had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of God - never will He waste their deeds.

47:11 That is because God is the protector of those who have believed and because the disbelievers have no protector.

47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.

Crusades - Wikipedia

In 1095, Pope Urban II called for the First Crusade in a sermon at the Council of Clermont. He encouraged military support for the Byzantine Empire and its Emperor, Alexios I, who needed reinforcements for his conflict with westward migrating Turks colonizing Anatolia.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This should be a warning to all Americans. They must remember that Islam is not a religion, it is a political movement to dominate everything around it.

More than 90 American Muslims, nearly all of them Democrats, are running for public office across the country this year. Many are young and politically inexperienced, and most are long shots. But they represent a collective gamble: that voters are so disgusted by America’s least popular president on record that they’re willing to elect members of America’s least popular religious minority group.

Although their number seems small, the candidacies mark an unprecedented rise for the nation’s diverse Muslim community that typically has been underrepresented in American politics.

One only has to look at what elected Muslims have done in the UK.

More of this alarming news @ The blue Muslim wave: American Muslims launch political campaigns, hope to deliver ‘sweet justice’ to Trump

Ninety?

Out of how many?

A warning that people in America are free to practice their religion legally?

Why do you think they're going to the Democrats? Probably because they know what the Republicans are, warmongers.

Believe it or not Comrade, it is still legal to refuse to vote for a Muslim, and to campaign against Muslims.

When you win your war against the 1st Amendment, you'll change that.

 

[Synthaholic]

More than 90 American Muslims, nearly all of them Democrats, are running for public office across the country this year

You brought this on with your extreme politics. Now let’s see how many we Liberals can get elected!

You are a regressive, not a liberal.

If you were liberal, you would oppose the very least liberal ideology on the planet rather than supporting it as you are doing.

You misunderstand. This is all about pissing off the other side, no matter if it hurts America or not.

Isn’t that the lesson you wingnuts have been trying to teach us since the tea party retards?

Now, where can I donate to one of these Muslim candidates?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good grief. Anybody remember when the right had it's panties in a twist over electing CATHOLICS to office? Claims about loyalty to Pope over country?

Some things never change.

Good grief, remember when the Catholics flew jet liners into sky scrapers?

Muslims have far more in common with Nazis than they do with Catholics.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Good for them. The more variety the better.

Allahu Akbar indeed.

The enemy of America is the friend of the democrat.

Actually, the enemy of America IS the democrat.

 

[joaquinmiller]

" Fictional Ishmaelism Angst For Failing To Conquer Europe "

* Vernacular of Historical Blubbering *

Are you trying to say European Christians didn't suit up and trek off to the Holy Lands? Or were you thinking Christians had given up slavery at that point? Maybe you were thinking the Inquisition wasn't going on at the same time. Or maybe you're just the Zombie Fucking Apocalypse.

Fictional ishmaelism had been running amok for 400 years prior to the first crusade .

As martin luther related , a war in the name of christianity is antithetical , even though lords and kings may implement a military to secure the freedom of their peoples .

In contrast , war in the name of fictional ishmaelism is expected .

47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if God had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of God - never will He waste their deeds.

47:11 That is because God is the protector of those who have believed and because the disbelievers have no protector.

47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.

Crusades - Wikipedia

In 1095, Pope Urban II called for the First Crusade in a sermon at the Council of Clermont. He encouraged military support for the Byzantine Empire and its Emperor, Alexios I, who needed reinforcements for his conflict with westward migrating Turks colonizing Anatolia.

Did Pope Urban say, paraphrasing, "we're fighting them over there, so we don't have to fight them here"?

 

[ptbw forever]

Good for them. The more variety the better.

Good for them but horrible for the United States. Muslims and Sharia Law are incompatible with the US Constitution

And the Confederate flag wavers are compatible with the US Constitution?

Yes they are! Now you are saying that Sharia Law is compatible with the US Constitution?

Hahaha.

The Confederacy which wanted to leave the union, is compatible with the union it wanted to leave?

The Confederacy which was full of racism is compatible with a Constitution based on equality under the law and equal rights for all regardless of skin color.

BULLSHIT.

That is why they seceded, moron.