Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know EXACTLY what the words were. You and the forum don't, so all's good.At a loss for words iggy ?
Climate Change Will Give Rise to More CancersÂ
Climate change will bring an acute toll worldwide, with rising temperatures, wildfires and poor air quality, accompanied by higher rates of cancer, especially lung, skin and gastrointestinal cancers.www.ucsf.edu
I do not believe lies. Enough said.Yup. Read it too in the tabloids. The difference is, you believe any of that made up shit.
Higher education isn’t your thing. We get it.I know EXACTLY what the words were. You and the forum don't, so all's good.
The trouble is that your "judgement" isn't based on evidence but bias.I do not believe lies. Enough said.
ironic huh?The trouble is that your "judgement" isn't based on evidence but bias.
Are you under the impression that the conclusion you and he have reached are based on evidence overwhelming in either volume or quantity the mountains of peer reviewed science on which the IPCC conclusions are based?ironic huh?
The problem took a long time to develop, it will take a long time to solve. But not solving it is not an option.Even if climate change were caused by human activity, the only relevant question now is...
What FEASIBLE actions could humans take in order to change the trajectory by any meaningful amount?
And the answer is, "None."
Then they will have to opt for a disappearing coastline, accelerating extinctions, intolerable heatwaves, crop losses and the disappearance of fresh water supplies.Humans in developed countries are not going to give up transportation, heat, cooling, or the internet. Humans in Third World and Developing countries will continue to massively strive for modernity by burning carbon, most often coal, because it is plentiful and cheap.
All of that can be done without emitting GHGs and wind and solar are now cheaper than fossil fuel, so what is it, exactly, you're complaining about?This latter group is far more than half of the world's population. Do you want to be the one to tell them that they are NOT ENTITLED to heating, air conditioning, efficient transportation, clean water, treated wastewater, and the internet?
Wind, solar and EVs are engineering solutions.Humans will deal with climate change through engineering solutions, just like we dealt with every harmful natural phenomenon in the past.
That is paranoid nonsense.The Global Warming conspiracy is nothing but a Leftist power play, as clearly demonstrated by their rejection of nuclear power.
my evidence is evidence from PHDs who haven't taken money for their inputs. All peer reviewed means is the people who take the money want to get more money as I posted in earlier posts.Are you under the impression that the conclusion you and he have reached are based on evidence overwhelming in either volume or quantity the mountains of peer reviewed science on which the IPCC conclusions are based?
More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle
More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.news.cornell.edu
AND
Abstract
While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.
The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.
/-----/ "Then they will have to opt for a disappearing coastline, accelerating extinctions, intolerable heatwaves, crop losses and the disappearance of fresh water supplies."The problem took a long time to develop, it will take a long time to solve. But not solving it is not an option.
Then they will have to opt for a disappearing coastline, accelerating extinctions, intolerable heatwaves, crop losses and the disappearance of fresh water supplies.
All of that can be done without emitting GHGs and wind and solar are now cheaper than fossil fuel, so what is it, exactly, you're complaining about?
Wind, solar and EVs are engineering solutions.
That is paranoid nonsense.
borgenproject.org
That’s ignorant. Everyone promotes the use of nuclear energy. You bozos just don’t get it. All the energy sources on earth have been derived from nuclear energy. Wtf are you talking about ? We just refuse to justify FISSON over fusion reaction for ALL our sources.Even if climate change were caused by human activity, the only relevant question now is...
What FEASIBLE actions could humans take in order to change the trajectory by any meaningful amount?
And the answer is, "None."
Humans in developed countries are not going to give up transportation, heat, cooling, or the internet. Humans in Third World and Developing countries will continue to massively strive for modernity by burning carbon, most often coal, because it is plentiful and cheap.
This latter group is far more than half of the world's population. Do you want to be the one to tell them that they are NOT ENTITLED to heating, air conditioning, efficient transportation, clean water, treated wastewater, and the internet?
Humans will deal with climate change through engineering solutions, just like we dealt with every harmful natural phenomenon in the past. The Global Warming conspiracy is nothing but a Leftist power play, as clearly demonstrated by their rejection of nuclear power.
www.mystateline.com
There is nuclear linked power coming everywhere in the US. They are called solar panels.Could more nuclear power plants be coming to Illinois?
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WTVO) — There is pending legislation in Springfield to lift Illinois’ historic ban on building new nuclear power plants. The move comes as the state transitions from coal t…
You’re just far too ignorant to have any sort of conversation.There is nuclear linked power coming everywhere in the US. They are called solar panels.
/------/ Then coal is nuclear power too.There is nuclear linked power coming everywhere in the US. They are called solar panels.
Yup, but like all fossil fuels, way too toxic. You ever burn coal at home……? You really don’t have a fking clue./------/ Then coal is nuclear power too.
Really ? You’re way too ignorant. Tell us what powers the sun iggy.You’re just far too ignorant to have any sort of conversation.
Really ? You’re way too ignorant. Tell us what powers the sun iggy.
/----/ Yes, dummy. Growing up in the 1950s we fed our firepace with either coal or wood. My grandparents all had coal-fired furnaces. You could smell the coal dust.Yup, but like all fossil fuels, way too toxic. You ever burn coal at home……? You really don’t have a fking clue.
