More than 99.9% of peer reviewed studies show that humans are the primary cause of global warming

[Dagosa]

/----/ Yes, dummy. Growing up in the 1950s we fed our firepace with either coal or wood. My grandparents all had coal-fired furnaces. You could smell the coal dust.

You could smell coal dust ? Obviously it affected your intellect. Hilarious.

 

[Dagosa]

what's that have to do with solar panels?

You can’t be serious. Do you know where the photons come from that power solar panels ?

 

[jc456]

You can’t be serious. Do you know where the photons come from that power solar panels ?

They aren’t a nuclear reactor idiot

 

[Dagosa]

They aren’t a nuclear reactor idiot

Hilarious, who said it was a reactor. I said it was a reaction. So you don’t know that nuclear fusion provides the sun’s energy ? And you call me an idiot ?

 

[Foxfyre]

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

AND

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Abstract​

While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

---

The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.

Since nobody is allowed into the scientific community who doesn't agree with those studies, I'm surprised it isn't 100%.

And I'm pretty sure all those studies carefully avoid the fact that even draconian efforts to reduce/eliminate CO2 emissions for decades now has not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by any measurable amount.

 

[jc456]

Hilarious, who said it was a reactor. I said it was a reaction. So you don’t know that nuclear fusion provides the sun’s energy ? And you call me an idiot ?

Nope, reaction reactor?

 

[Dagosa]

Since nobody is allowed into the scientific community who doesn't agree with those studies, I'm surprised it isn't 100%.

And I'm pretty sure all those studies carefully avoid the fact that even draconian efforts to reduce/eliminate CO2 emissions for decades now has not reduced the CO2 in the atmosphere by any measurable amount.

Exactly right. Idiots generally aren’t allowed to practice science at these institutes. Is your doctor who used medical science from the same universities an idiot ?

 

[Dagosa]

Nope, reaction reactor?

Huh ? The sun is a nuclear fusion REACTOR where reactions take place.
You didn’t know that ?

Nuclear Fusion in the Sun Explained Perfectly by Science

Nuclear fusion is the source of Sun's phenomenal energy output. The Hydrogen and Helium atoms that constitute Sun, combine in a heavy amount every second to generate a stable and a nearly inexhaustible source of energy.

universavvy.com

 

[Cellblock2429]

You could smell coal dust ? Obviously it affected your intellect. Hilarious.

/——/ No you idiot. It was a smell in the basement where the coal was stored, not in the rest of the house. GEEEZE what a moron. And coal was incredibly cheap so everyone could have a warm home in the winter.

 

[Dagosa]

/——/ No you idiot. It was a smell in the basement where the coal was stored, not in the rest of the house. GEEEZE what a moron. And coal was incredibly cheap so everyone could have a warm home in the winter.

And your point is what, we should return to coal because it’s cheap ?

 

[Cellblock2429]

And your point is what, we should return to coal because it’s cheap ?

/——/ No. it was about stopping poverty stricken Africans from using coal instead of burning dung for cooking. Are you incapable of following a thread? See post 191 if you can count that high.

 

[Dagosa]

/——/ No. it was about stopping poverty stricken Africans from using coal instead of burning dung for cooking. Are you incapable of following a thread?
View attachment 803608

So you’re a proponent of burning coal by Poor people.
You have a picture. You have shit.

 

[Cellblock2429]

So you’re a proponent of burning coal by Poor people.
You have a picture. You have shit.

/——-/ “You have shit”
Let ‘em burn shit for cooking as tolling as you live a comfortable life. Typical elitist.

 

[jc456]

Huh ? The sun is a nuclear fusion REACTOR where reactions take place.
You didn’t know that ?

Nuclear Fusion in the Sun Explained Perfectly by Science

Nuclear fusion is the source of Sun's phenomenal energy output. The Hydrogen and Helium atoms that constitute Sun, combine in a heavy amount every second to generate a stable and a nearly inexhaustible source of energy.

universavvy.com

The solar panel isn’t and our discussion

 

[Dagosa]

The solar panel isn’t and our discussion

Thats silly. If your house uses electricity generated from fossil fuels, you trying to tell us that fossil fuels is not the discussion illiterate. All our energy here on earth is related to nuclear fusion. That includes photons for solar cells.

 

[ActionJackson]

More than 99.9% of studies agree: Humans caused climate change | Cornell Chronicle

More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans, according to a new survey of 88,125 climate-related studies.

news.cornell.edu

AND

Radware Bot Manager Captcha

Abstract​

While controls over the Earth's climate system have undergone rigorous hypothesis-testing since the 1800s, questions over the scientific consensus of the role of human activities in modern climate change continue to arise in public settings. We update previous efforts to quantify the scientific consensus on climate change by searching the recent literature for papers sceptical of anthropogenic-caused global warming. From a dataset of 88125 climate-related papers published since 2012, when this question was last addressed comprehensively, we examine a randomized subset of 3000 such publications. We also use a second sample-weighted approach that was specifically biased with keywords to help identify any sceptical peer-reviewed papers in the whole dataset. We identify four sceptical papers out of the sub-set of 3000, as evidenced by abstracts that were rated as implicitly or explicitly sceptical of human-caused global warming. In our sample utilizing pre-identified sceptical keywords we found 28 papers that were implicitly or explicitly sceptical. We conclude with high statistical confidence that the scientific consensus on human-caused contemporary climate change—expressed as a proportion of the total publications—exceeds 99% in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

---

The consensus means something. For all practical purposes, there is no longer ANY scientific debate on the primary cause of global warming.

Then everyone who believes your nonsense should “off” themselves and save the planet.

 

[Dagosa]

/——-/ “You have shit”
Let ‘em burn shit for cooking as tolling as you live a comfortable life. Typical elitist.

Elitist ? You’re the one who wants them to breath pollutants just because they are poor.

 

[jc456]

And your point is what, we should return to coal because it’s cheap ?

Indeed. Why do we need to spend money?

 

[jc456]

Thats silly. If your house uses electricity generated from fossil fuels, you trying to tell us that fossil fuels is not the discussion illiterate. All our energy here on earth is related to nuclear fusion. That includes photons for solar cells.

I can’t help your delusions

 

[Crick]

Then everyone who believes your nonsense should “off” themselves and save the planet.

I will add that to my collection. You're about the 27th denier to make death wishes to people advocating for mainstream science.