Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do racists try to defend their racism by calling others racist? That`s really lame not to mention idiotic.I wasn`t necessarily addressing you but thanks for outing yourself. I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet.Too bad he squandered all of the reward money that you crackers sent him.
Awwww ... Some racist asshole called me a cracker.
I never sent him any "reward money" I just happen to recognize that this was a tragic event with a tragic outcome that was in no way a crime or a violation of civil rights.
Hey you racist fuck, are you also willing to let the Grand Jury decide in the Ferguson case?
Why do racists try to defend their racism by calling others racist? That`s really lame not to mention idiotic.I wasn`t necessarily addressing you but thanks for outing yourself. I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet.Too bad he squandered all of the reward money that you crackers sent him.
Awwww ... Some racist asshole called me a cracker.
I never sent him any "reward money" I just happen to recognize that this was a tragic event with a tragic outcome that was in no way a crime or a violation of civil rights.
Hey you racist fuck, are you also willing to let the Grand Jury decide in the Ferguson case?
I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
The main problem with charging Zimmerman with civil rights violations is the nature of the charges. He was found not guilty by reason of self defense. He killed Trayvon Martin because he had a right to defend himself. This precludes civil rights charges because Zimmerman already had a right to defend himself. Fools may say he had no such right. However his rights were litigated and the subject is closed.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
A worthless thug is dead. All is right with the world.
The main problem with charging Zimmerman with civil rights violations is the nature of the charges. He was found not guilty by reason of self defense. He killed Trayvon Martin because he had a right to defend himself. This precludes civil rights charges because Zimmerman already had a right to defend himself. Fools may say he had no such right. However his rights were litigated and the subject is closed.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
You would be correct if the issue was whether or not Zimmerman killed Martin. The threshold would be that it was more likely than not that Zimmerman was the killer. There is no such issue. It was never denied that Zimmerman killed Martin.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
Incorrect, he could be tried even if he was found not guilty in a criminal court.
There is a lower threshold for a civil case.
You would be correct if the issue was whether or not Zimmerman killed Martin. The threshold would be that it was more likely than not that Zimmerman was the killer. There is no such issue. It was never denied that Zimmerman killed Martin.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
Incorrect, he could be tried even if he was found not guilty in a criminal court.
There is a lower threshold for a civil case.
No. Because it was already legally established that Zimmerman had a right to cause Martin's death. Otherwise every time someone was killed it would result in a civil rights violation.You would be correct if the issue was whether or not Zimmerman killed Martin. The threshold would be that it was more likely than not that Zimmerman was the killer. There is no such issue. It was never denied that Zimmerman killed Martin.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
Incorrect, he could be tried even if he was found not guilty in a criminal court.
There is a lower threshold for a civil case.
At issue would be whether or not Zimmerman violated Martin's civil rights - not whether or not he caused his death.
To me, there was no evidence to even suggest this, it should get tossed, but if they go ahead with it, Zimmerman will be fighting an uphill battle to clear his name.
* I have an incredibly small amount of faith in our judicial system.
No. Because it was already legally established that Zimmerman had a right to cause Martin's death. Otherwise every time someone was killed it would result in a civil rights violation.You would be correct if the issue was whether or not Zimmerman killed Martin. The threshold would be that it was more likely than not that Zimmerman was the killer. There is no such issue. It was never denied that Zimmerman killed Martin.I may be wrong but "civil rights" are charges brought in law enforcement or government agents. Or sometimes against a business for discrimination. Private citizens are rarely charged. They either commit a crime or not. Two Joes on a street with no govt or business involved...not sure civil rights even apply. Its either a regular ass crime or not.
Incorrect, he could be tried even if he was found not guilty in a criminal court.
There is a lower threshold for a civil case.
At issue would be whether or not Zimmerman violated Martin's civil rights - not whether or not he caused his death.
To me, there was no evidence to even suggest this, it should get tossed, but if they go ahead with it, Zimmerman will be fighting an uphill battle to clear his name.
* I have an incredibly small amount of faith in our judicial system.
Nobody had any bones broken in their faces.You mean an anonymous windbag like you? ....I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet...
![]()
![]()
Holder is keeping this issue alive so that he can hold onto Zimmerman's gun. The gun is worth lot and will probably end up as a precious gift to some museum or sold. Zimmerman had bones broken in his face for the crime of following Trevon. Just like the cop who had bones broken in his face for the crime of telling Brown to get out of the street. The race baiters need to find more sympathetic victim's than a punk casing houses to rob or a thug who just robbed a liquor store. Now it turns out the DOJ has been funding and promoting the unrest in Ferguson. Are you surprised. BO's goal is to simply destroy this country. Everything he does is to this end. Civil war is his goal but mark my word, he will find some excuse to install marshal law. We are in trouble folks. God, hold your hand over our country. Go ahead and call me anything, Bro. I am a white Christian older male and I (as a second class citizen) have no right to be offended about anything. Then again I am not a delicate flower who will lilt if I hear a word I don't like. Name calling is such a lazy and cowardly tactic. If you have no facts, STFU Please.
Why do racists try to defend their racism by calling others racist? That`s really lame not to mention idiotic.I wasn`t necessarily addressing you but thanks for outing yourself. I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet.Too bad he squandered all of the reward money that you crackers sent him.
Awwww ... Some racist asshole called me a cracker.
I never sent him any "reward money" I just happen to recognize that this was a tragic event with a tragic outcome that was in no way a crime or a violation of civil rights.
Hey you racist fuck, are you also willing to let the Grand Jury decide in the Ferguson case?
I wasn`t necessarily addressing you but thanks for outing yourself. I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet.Too bad he squandered all of the reward money that you crackers sent him.
Awwww ... Some racist asshole called me a cracker.
I never sent him any "reward money" I just happen to recognize that this was a tragic event with a tragic outcome that was in no way a crime or a violation of civil rights.
Hey you racist fuck, are you also willing to let the Grand Jury decide in the Ferguson case?
Nobody had any bones broken in their faces.You mean an anonymous windbag like you? ....I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet...
![]()
![]()
Holder is keeping this issue alive so that he can hold onto Zimmerman's gun. The gun is worth lot and will probably end up as a precious gift to some museum or sold. Zimmerman had bones broken in his face for the crime of following Trevon. Just like the cop who had bones broken in his face for the crime of telling Brown to get out of the street. The race baiters need to find more sympathetic victim's than a punk casing houses to rob or a thug who just robbed a liquor store. Now it turns out the DOJ has been funding and promoting the unrest in Ferguson. Are you surprised. BO's goal is to simply destroy this country. Everything he does is to this end. Civil war is his goal but mark my word, he will find some excuse to install marshal law. We are in trouble folks. God, hold your hand over our country. Go ahead and call me anything, Bro. I am a white Christian older male and I (as a second class citizen) have no right to be offended about anything. Then again I am not a delicate flower who will lilt if I hear a word I don't like. Name calling is such a lazy and cowardly tactic. If you have no facts, STFU Please.
A worthless thug is dead. All is right with the world.
He was just a kid who made a poor decision. He was hardly worthless.
A fractured nose is not a broken nose.Nobody had any bones broken in their faces.You mean an anonymous windbag like you? ....I prefer to have the grand jury make the call on this, not some anonymous windbag on the internet...
![]()
![]()
Holder is keeping this issue alive so that he can hold onto Zimmerman's gun. The gun is worth lot and will probably end up as a precious gift to some museum or sold. Zimmerman had bones broken in his face for the crime of following Trevon. Just like the cop who had bones broken in his face for the crime of telling Brown to get out of the street. The race baiters need to find more sympathetic victim's than a punk casing houses to rob or a thug who just robbed a liquor store. Now it turns out the DOJ has been funding and promoting the unrest in Ferguson. Are you surprised. BO's goal is to simply destroy this country. Everything he does is to this end. Civil war is his goal but mark my word, he will find some excuse to install marshal law. We are in trouble folks. God, hold your hand over our country. Go ahead and call me anything, Bro. I am a white Christian older male and I (as a second class citizen) have no right to be offended about anything. Then again I am not a delicate flower who will lilt if I hear a word I don't like. Name calling is such a lazy and cowardly tactic. If you have no facts, STFU Please.
Here is some evidence that Zimmerman's nose was broken and he had several cuts on the back of his head.
Sources Medical report says Zimmerman had broken nose other injuries after fight - CNN.com
(CNN) -- A medical report by George Zimmerman's family doctor shows the neighborhood watch volunteer was diagnosed with a fractured nose, two black eyes and two lacerations on the back of the head after his fatal confrontation with Trayvon Martin.
The policeman in Ferguson had his eye socket broken. The argument was that it was a small fracture and not a break. It's only a SMALL fracture when it is to someone else's eye socket.
So your point would be that ?