Most Misinformed Viewers?

Want to know who the most uninformed is?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Watch it and cry for our nation

Its a cute defense to go get idiot Obama voters making asses of themselves on you tube. Its also easy for me to show you how Fox is the number one cable network out there and ever single one of its viewers are idiots who actually belive fox is "fair and balanced".

The reason Fox is number one...sheeple LOVE to be told what to think.

Thats simply not possible. If we're gonna play on Fox viewers based on a bunch of idiot know nothings than the same can and will be said of obama voters.

The dumbest voting block in history.
 
The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed.

SUCK up your propaganda, libbies!

:cuckoo:
 
Want to know who the most uninformed is?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Watch it and cry for our nation

Its a cute defense to go get idiot Obama voters making asses of themselves on you tube. Its also easy for me to show you how Fox is the number one cable network out there and ever single one of its viewers are idiots who actually belive fox is "fair and balanced".

The reason Fox is number one...sheeple LOVE to be told what to think.

Deflection. obama voters have proven how stupid they are
 
Want to know who the most uninformed is?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Watch it and cry for our nation

Its a cute defense to go get idiot Obama voters making asses of themselves on you tube. Its also easy for me to show you how Fox is the number one cable network out there and ever single one of its viewers are idiots who actually belive fox is "fair and balanced".

The reason Fox is number one...sheeple LOVE to be told what to think.

It's just a school of red herrings ("school" in the sense of fish). He thinks a bunch of amateur video interviews of voters he found on YouTube can somehow be compared with poll data about mass media. It can't. Comparing viewers and voters; apples and orangutans.
 
Last edited:
Want to know who the most uninformed is?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Watch it and cry for our nation

Its a cute defense to go get idiot Obama voters making asses of themselves on you tube. Its also easy for me to show you how Fox is the number one cable network out there and ever single one of its viewers are idiots who actually belive fox is "fair and balanced".

The reason Fox is number one...sheeple LOVE to be told what to think.

It's just a school of red herrings ("school" in the sense of fish). He thinks a bunch of amateur video interviews of voters he found on YouTube can somehow be compared with poll data about mass media. It can't. Comparing viewers and voters; apples and orangutans.

Yes.. I am sure Fox viewers get tired of being compared to you Orangutans
 
Ooooo.. what a shock.. like you could not have predicted THIS kind of outcome from a COLLEGE POLL.. :rolleyes:

Yet another in the long line of attempts to portray anything they deem as 'Republican' as redneck, ignorant, or stupid...

If many were not, it would be less easy to stereotype them. The ones who piss me off worse are the yuppie wanna bes who think being a Republican will make them rich - or the "pretend rich."


So I guess since so many DEMs are like Occupy Tards (a majority supported their actions and believed many things the Occupy Tards chanted)... you are indeed easy to stereotype as one of them

Your ignorance is astounding

Yea, fuck Occupy and fuck you too! NOBODY has answers, otherwise we wouldn't be in such a clusterfuck.
 
The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed.

SUCK up your propaganda, libbies!

:cuckoo:

That's not even a sentence. But these weren't "MSM shit"; they're studies done by universities and pollsters. Sorry. Again, you guys keep pointing out the Fox talking heads are not journalists but commentators. And you're right. And the data back you up, so what are you whining about?

Better question -- how come you have an emotional relationship with a news channel? Can you imagine some poster having an emotional meltdown defending CNN or ABC?
What do I mean by that?

This thread has the aura of a mid l8fe crisis or small penis syndrome.

I'm sure the rest of your left-wing circle jerk is telling you that.

You mean it was based on the work of some pinko professors sucking on the government tit.

-- and of course the sterling entry above, complete with a sentence banged out so hard it forgot to bring a verb. Plus the usual coterie of red herrings and deflections to YouTube voter interviews and Obamacare and everything but the kitchen sink -- anything to get the spotlight off the poor Fox. Why is that?

Ingestion of information is not an emotional contract. It's cold hard facts. When you have an emotional relationship with a news channel, you're not ingesting information. You're ingesting a soap opera. That's why some of y'all are so attached to it on an emotional level; because that's what Fox sells, regardless what they call it. That's why everything is relentlessly dressed as some morality play featuring Good versus Evil. Everything is twisted, turned and spun on its head to get you to take sides. That's soap opera.

In effect, expecting to be reliably informed by watching Fox Noise is like expecting to be qualified to perform surgery by watching General Hospital.
 
Last edited:
Horseshit. Your so-called "studies" by liberal quacks are nothing but propaganda.

No propaganda in FAUX News, I suppose?

A lot less than the stuff ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN pump out. Can yo uquote one thing broadcast on a FOX NEWS program that isn't true?

Yea, idiots like Hannity calling Obama a socialist, which he is, and thinking NO Republicans are socialists. They ALL take our money and distribute it. They are all liars, every last Catfood Mary one of them.
 
It's just a school of red herrings ("school" in the sense of fish). He thinks a bunch of amateur video interviews of voters he found on YouTube can somehow be compared with poll data about mass media. It can't. Comparing viewers and voters; apples and orangutans.

So how does the poll data show that FOX viewers are ignorant. I don't believe the poll even asked the participants if they watched FOX.
 
The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed.

SUCK up your propaganda, libbies!

:cuckoo:

That's not even a sentence. But these weren't "MSM shit"; they're studies done by universities and pollsters. Sorry. Again, you guys keep pointing out the Fox talking heads are not journalists but commentators. And you're right. And the data back you up, so what are you whining about?

Better question -- how come you have an emotional relationship with a news channel? Can you imagine some poster having an emotional meltdown defending CNN or ABC?
What do I mean by that?
This thread has the aura of a mid l8fe crisis or small penis syndrome.

I'm sure the rest of your left-wing circle jerk is telling you that.

You mean it was based on the work of some pinko professors sucking on the government tit.

-- and of course the sterling entry above, complete with a sentence banged out so hard it forgot to bring a verb.

Ingestion of information is not an emotional contract. It's cold hard facts.
When you have an emotional relationship with a news channel, you're not watching information. You're watching a soap opera. That's why some of y'all are so attached to it on an emotional level; because that's what Fox sells, regardless what they call it. That's why everything is relentlessly dressed as some morality play featuring Good versus Evil.

In effect, expecting to be reliably informed by watching Fox Noise is like expecting to be qualified to perform surgery by watching General Hospital.

General question: How old are you?

A.: 18.

Pgog's input: "18 isn't even a sentence."

Pogo, you are a clueless drone.

:thup:
 
No propaganda in FAUX News, I suppose?

A lot less than the stuff ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN pump out. Can yo uquote one thing broadcast on a FOX NEWS program that isn't true?

Yea, idiots like Hannity calling Obama a socialist, which he is, and thinking NO Republicans are socialists. They ALL take our money and distribute it. They are all liars, every last Catfood Mary one of them.

Obama is a socialist. Every time he talks about "the rich paying their fair share," he's spouting Marxist dogma.
 
If many were not, it would be less easy to stereotype them. The ones who piss me off worse are the yuppie wanna bes who think being a Republican will make them rich - or the "pretend rich."


So I guess since so many DEMs are like Occupy Tards (a majority supported their actions and believed many things the Occupy Tards chanted)... you are indeed easy to stereotype as one of them

Your ignorance is astounding

Yea, fuck Occupy and fuck you too! NOBODY has answers, otherwise we wouldn't be in such a clusterfuck.


Awwww.. does 'ums not like to be stereotyped like you were stereotyping others??

There are answers... but wingers such as yourself don't like to hear them because you are too concerned with your subjective 'fairness' and too willing to have others foot the bills for the shit you scream for
 
Ooooo.. what a shock.. like you could not have predicted THIS kind of outcome from a COLLEGE POLL.. :rolleyes:

Yet another in the long line of attempts to portray anything they deem as 'Republican' as redneck, ignorant, or stupid...

If many were not, it would be less easy to stereotype them. The ones who piss me off worse are the yuppie wanna bes who think being a Republican will make them rich - or the "pretend rich."

You loons stereotype yourselves everytime you post such nonsense. Only ignorant asses equate being Republican with being rich, or wanting to be rich. It shows that you are kool aid drinkers that believe everything your party leaders tell you.

As far as being misinformed goes, most FOX viewers knew that Obama was an incompetent, inexperienced jerk, and apparently the rest of you did not know those simple facts. All of you ignorant asses need to start watching FOX.
 
The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed.

SUCK up your propaganda, libbies!

:cuckoo:

That's not even a sentence. But these weren't "MSM shit"; they're studies done by universities and pollsters. Sorry. Again, you guys keep pointing out the Fox talking heads are not journalists but commentators. And you're right. And the data back you up, so what are you whining about?

Better question -- how come you have an emotional relationship with a news channel? Can you imagine some poster having an emotional meltdown defending CNN or ABC?
What do I mean by that?




You mean it was based on the work of some pinko professors sucking on the government tit.

-- and of course the sterling entry above, complete with a sentence banged out so hard it forgot to bring a verb.

Ingestion of information is not an emotional contract. It's cold hard facts.
When you have an emotional relationship with a news channel, you're not watching information. You're watching a soap opera. That's why some of y'all are so attached to it on an emotional level; because that's what Fox sells, regardless what they call it. That's why everything is relentlessly dressed as some morality play featuring Good versus Evil.

In effect, expecting to be reliably informed by watching Fox Noise is like expecting to be qualified to perform surgery by watching General Hospital.

General question: How old are you?

A.: 18.

Pgog's input: "18 isn't even a sentence."

Pogo, you are a clueless drone.

:thup:

"The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed."
---- where's the verb? Where's the object?

Dumbass.
 
Last edited:
This thread has the aura of a mid l8fe crisis or small penis syndrome.

I'm sure the rest of your left-wing circle jerk is telling you that.

You mean it was based on the work of some pinko professors sucking on the government tit.

-- and of course the sterling entry above, complete with a sentence banged out so hard it forgot to bring a verb... red herrings and deflections to YouTube voter interviews and Obamacare and everything but the kitchen sink.

You've combined my statements with someone else's, so it's hard to know what the hell your talking about. Both of my sentences have a verb in them.

Ingestion of information is not an emotional contract. It's cold hard facts.

Yeah, right. Do you suppose anyone aside from the drones believes you don't filter information through a pinko filter?

When you have an emotional relationship with a news channel, you're not ingesting information. You're ingesting a soap opera.

The only people I see having an emotional relationship with FOX News are you and all the other drones on here who respond to it like a vampire responds to a crucifix.

That's why some of y'all are so attached to it on an emotional level; because that's what Fox sells, regardless what they call it. That's why everything is relentlessly dressed as some morality play featuring Good versus Evil. Everything is twisted, turned and spun on its head to get you to take sides. That's soap opera.

I could swear you're talking about NBC News.

In effect, expecting to be reliably informed by watching Fox Noise is like expecting to be qualified to perform surgery by watching General Hospital.

And you pretend you don't have an emotional relationship with FOX News!

I just watch it because all the left-wing sanctimony and bias on the other channels makes me ill. I never had a thing to say about FOX News until I noticed the left-wing jihad against the great liberal Satan.
 

Forum List

Back
Top