IlarMeilyr
Liability Reincarnate!
That's not even a sentence. But these weren't "MSM shit"; they're studies done by universities and pollsters. Sorry. Again, you guys keep pointing out the Fox talking heads are not journalists but commentators. And you're right. And the data back you up, so what are you whining about?
Better question -- how come you have an emotional relationship with a news channel? Can you imagine some poster having an emotional meltdown defending CNN or ABC?
What do I mean by that?
-- and of course the sterling entry above, complete with a sentence banged out so hard it forgot to bring a verb.
Ingestion of information is not an emotional contract. It's cold hard facts.
When you have an emotional relationship with a news channel, you're not watching information. You're watching a soap opera. That's why some of y'all are so attached to it on an emotional level; because that's what Fox sells, regardless what they call it. That's why everything is relentlessly dressed as some morality play featuring Good versus Evil.
In effect, expecting to be reliably informed by watching Fox Noise is like expecting to be qualified to perform surgery by watching General Hospital.
General question: How old are you?
A.: 18.
Pgog's input: "18 isn't even a sentence."
Pogo, you are a clueless drone.
![]()
"The liberals who accept as reliable all the MSM shit that says that FOX viewers are the least well informed."
---- where's the verb?
Dumbass.
You are a plodding stupid motherfucker.
Let's take it extra slow just for you, you retard.
Look at the OP question.