Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He just sounded like a condescending prick when he made the comments he did, turned a lot of people off, it didn't help his cause to those who are yet undecided. That's all that matters at this point.
Our Military still uses horses to charge into battle? I must have missed that part of my basic training.
Here is a picture of US Army forces in 2001.
He just sounded like a condescending prick when he made the comments he did, turned a lot of people off, it didn't help his cause to those who are yet undecided. That's all that matters at this point.
i watched Cnn for all three and they had that ticker at the bottom measuring reactions from undecided voters. In all three debates whenever EITHER of them went negative it turned them off.
That being said the sarcastic joke was great. I love sarcastic comebacks.
I suggest you change your tampon.
EVERY Marine still trains and uses a BAYONET.. no amount of spin from the Zombie NUTS can change that MORON's words..
LOL
Take a look at this.....
the logo for the mairne corps martial arts program..... oh...look at that...a bayonet.
Also... take a look at the training pics.... oh my...what is that.... bayonet training.....
FEWER: To mean less.
NONE: Absent, nothing.
Are you able to see the difference?
This one is going too far. I no longer think the right wing is just wrong. Now, they've proven that their fucking MORONIC.
Our Military still uses horses to charge into battle? I must have missed that part of my basic training.
Here is a picture of US Army forces in 2001.
awesome picture, it really proves nothing at all. You want a picture of some guys in a tank?
He just sounded like a condescending prick when he made the comments he did, turned a lot of people off, it didn't help his cause to those who are yet undecided. That's all that matters at this point.
i watched Cnn for all three and they had that ticker at the bottom measuring reactions from undecided voters. In all three debates whenever EITHER of them went negative it turned them off.
That being said the sarcastic joke was great. I love sarcastic comebacks.
I suggest you change your tampon.
poor babies... all het up that mittens got trounced. they were running around smug, obnoxious and happy after the first debate.
they'll get over it.
or not.
He just sounded like a condescending prick when he made the comments he did, turned a lot of people off, it didn't help his cause to those who are yet undecided. That's all that matters at this point.
i watched Cnn for all three and they had that ticker at the bottom measuring reactions from undecided voters. In all three debates whenever EITHER of them went negative it turned them off.
That being said the sarcastic joke was great. I love sarcastic comebacks.
I suggest you change your tampon.
poor babies... all het up that mittens got trounced. they were running around smug, obnoxious and happy after the first debate.
they'll get over it.
or not.
He just sounded like a condescending prick when he made the comments he did, turned a lot of people off, it didn't help his cause to those who are yet undecided. That's all that matters at this point.
it's only condescension in the eyes of those who think mitt would make a good president.
Not to worry, if Romney is elected we will see a lot more horses in the military, and more massed infantry charges against machine guns, but our boys will have bayonets. Romney may also reintroduce the old British-Regular tactics of standing upright in red coated ranks when firing at the enemy. The red coats made it easier to see them. The Democrats and military have dropped a lot of old good tried and true military tactics including the cavalry sabre charge, I can see a new poem emerging Romney's Light Brigade.
Wait till Mitt brings out his 1916 Navy
Cast iron riveted hulls, coal fired engines, Civil War era Monitors, cannons
Hey they might not be worth much in a fight....but there will be alot of them
Here is a picture of US Army forces in 2001.
awesome picture, it really proves nothing at all. You want a picture of some guys in a tank?
It proves that the US Army used horses in combat in 2001, something High Gravity said he missed in basic.
He was trying to paint Romney as old fashioned by saying he doesn't understand how the military works now by pointing out two things the military doesn't use any more. He failed.
So the president's actual words show hold less weight than what the anti-Obama people on the internet would like to believe he said?
Let me ask you. How many ships do you think we should have, based on your opinion that we don't need any government at all?
His exact words?
Gee, look at that, I was right, he was trying to portray Romney as not understanding how the military works today. In the process he lied about the fact that sequestration was proposed by the White House, not Congress, he lied about the year Romney is using as a baseline, and he lied about the fact that the Navy specifically thinks it needs more ships than we have.Bob, I just need to comment on this. First of all, the sequester is not something that I proposed. Its something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen. The budget that were talking about is not reducing our military spending. Its maintaining it. But I think Governor Romney maybe hasnt spent enough time looking at how our military works. You you mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets (laughter) because the nature of our militarys changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.
And so the question is not a game of Battleship where were counting ships. Its its what are our capabilities.
And so when I sit down with the secretary of the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we determine how are we going to be best able to meet all of our defense needs in a way that also keeps faith with our troops, that also makes sure that our veterans have the kind of support that they need when they come home. And that is not reflected in the kind of budget that youre putting forward, because it just dont work.
Want to try and tell me about Obama's exact words and how I am misrepresenting his intention again?
Our Military still uses horses to charge into battle? I must have missed that part of my basic training.
Here is a picture of US Army forces in 2001.
awesome picture, it really proves nothing at all. You want a picture of some guys in a tank?
Our Military still uses horses to charge into battle? I must have missed that part of my basic training.
Looks like you absolutely did..
Let's Not Forget The Reasons Why The Military Still Has Horses (And Bayonets) - Business Insider
And??
Most notably horses saw use in the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, when Special Operations soldiers rode them into combat with the Northern Alliance, against the Taliban
Looks like you absolutely did..
Let's Not Forget The Reasons Why The Military Still Has Horses (And Bayonets) - Business Insider
And??
Most notably horses saw use in the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, when Special Operations soldiers rode them into combat with the Northern Alliance, against the Taliban
True
That is why we have as many horses today as we did in 1916
What's it like to be the 21% of the populace who has to make constant excuses, lies, and carry the stank bathwater of a man who isn't fit to tie a Marine's shoe much less be his Commander? Being down on your knee's for that long must be leavin marks by now.. LOL Carry on..
awesome picture, it really proves nothing at all. You want a picture of some guys in a tank?
It proves that the US Army used horses in combat in 2001, something High Gravity said he missed in basic.
Come on man those guys were Special Forces, they don't teach horse riding courses in basic training.
It proves that the US Army used horses in combat in 2001, something High Gravity said he missed in basic.
Come on man those guys were Special Forces, they don't teach horse riding courses in basic training.
They don't teach you how to drive either, what's your point?
So the president's actual words show hold less weight than what the anti-Obama people on the internet would like to believe he said?
Let me ask you. How many ships do you think we should have, based on your opinion that we don't need any government at all?
His exact words?
Gee, look at that, I was right, he was trying to portray Romney as not understanding how the military works today. In the process he lied about the fact that sequestration was proposed by the White House, not Congress, he lied about the year Romney is using as a baseline, and he lied about the fact that the Navy specifically thinks it needs more ships than we have.Bob, I just need to comment on this. First of all, the sequester is not something that I proposed. Its something that Congress has proposed. It will not happen. The budget that were talking about is not reducing our military spending. Its maintaining it. But I think Governor Romney maybe hasnt spent enough time looking at how our military works. You you mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets (laughter) because the nature of our militarys changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.
And so the question is not a game of Battleship where were counting ships. Its its what are our capabilities.
And so when I sit down with the secretary of the Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, we determine how are we going to be best able to meet all of our defense needs in a way that also keeps faith with our troops, that also makes sure that our veterans have the kind of support that they need when they come home. And that is not reflected in the kind of budget that youre putting forward, because it just dont work.
Want to try and tell me about Obama's exact words and how I am misrepresenting his intention again?
Please try to make your desperate attempts at obfuscation shorter, if you don't mind. If you're going to be stupid, the least you could do is be brief.
You claimed the president said we never use bayonets any more. He didn't. You lied. He didn't.
Now go back and answer my question.
