Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Isn't it somewhat ironic that Putin's actions show why Trump's views on Nato and America's role in the world are simply .... wrong. If Russia or China were simply unopposed by at least equal military force from dictating what trade or military alliance any smaller country "must" join ... it would be antitheoretical to the point of the Founders in arguing for free trade?
That's because imagination is a trait of higher intellects.
You just said absolutely nothing, because it came straight out of your ass. If you had something real to offer, your ass would have been the last place to get it from. Get it?Joe has secretly dropped all investigations on Chinese espionage...and he has let Chinese spies leave the USA without prosecution....and he is pretending to care about the Ukraine but doing virtually nothing to fight back against Russia...this is what a compromised president looks like...everything you libs said would happen under Trump is happening under joe...joe is the crook not Trump....the bidens are crooked not the Trump's....
He's not yours? You do know he's a criminal who stole money from a children's cancer charity right?Enough o9f this bullshit! If Trump would say he is not running in 2024 all this woulod go away. The democrats just want to eliminate their biggest threat,.
Lets put what I said up for a vote....You just said absolutely nothing, because it came straight out of your ass. If you had something real to offer, your ass would have been the last place to get it from. Get it?
Trump as PRESIDENT talked to Putin for hours without witnesses DUMBASS DUPE....Awful but lawful is the Trump way....mobbed up Manhattan Real Estate SCUMBAG DUH....You Trump Murdoch Putin Rogan are pure scum... politically in your case, dupe. Try realityYou seem to think it is illegal for a candidate to coordinate or communicate with foreign powers.
Its not.
The only thing that is illegal is if the candidate asks the foreign country to do something harmful to the US, like Reagan did when he sent Oliver North to Tehran, to prevent a hostage release before the election.
It would also be illegal if a foreign entity aided a campaign without compensation, as that could be an illegal campaign contribution.
There is no evidence Trump did anything illegal like these 2 examples.
If Trump asked Putin to defer any retaliation for the illegal economic sanctions Obama imposed, that is not illegal, since it did not harm the US.
When I imagine Trump conspiring to overthrow a legal election, attacking the U.S., I'm pretty sure my intellect is kicking in.That's because imagination is a trait associated with higher intellects.
Everything you know is wrong, super dupe lol....Lets put what I said up for a vote....
Rambunctious said:
Joe has secretly dropped all investigations on Chinese espionage...and he has let Chinese spies leave the USA without prosecution....and he is pretending to care about the Ukraine but doing virtually nothing to fight back against Russia...this is what a compromised president looks like...everything you libs said would happen under Trump is happening under joe...joe is the crook not Trump....the bidens are crooked not the Trump's....
Did I say nothing in that post?
Yes......
No......
Damaging sanctions paralyzing his economy, is fighting back against Russia. Supplying Ukranians with military support is fighting back against Russia.Lets put what I said up for a vote....
Rambunctious said:
Joe has secretly dropped all investigations on Chinese espionage...and he has let Chinese spies leave the USA without prosecution....and he is pretending to care about the Ukraine but doing virtually nothing to fight back against Russia...this is what a compromised president looks like...everything you libs said would happen under Trump is happening under joe...joe is the crook not Trump....the bidens are crooked not the Trump's....
Did I say nothing in that post?
Yes......
No......
A bunch of Trump goons pleading the Fifth, getting arrested and jailed, some in contempt, and many more to be questioned, puts it more on a macro level.Maybe, but you've aptly illustrated your micro-intellect isn't reliable.
Really?...explain why....I'll wait....Everything you know is wrong, super dupe lol....
Libs supporting political prisoners....that should help you in 22 and 24.....Buuuuaaahahahahahahahahaha we will take the country back....A bunch of Trump goons pleading the Fifth, getting arrested and jailed, some in contempt, and many more to be questioned, puts it more on a macro level.
That's an interesting post. Nato policy towards Russia might be different today if in 1991 Nato didn't consider Russia's membership impossible. And yes, Trump is anti-theoretical to the existence of Nato, because in Trumpworld it is actually proper statecraft for a more powerful nation to dictate trade and even borders to less powerful states. In short, he'd redo 1939 to the present. And that was one reason I thought he was unacceptable to vote for.Actually, just the opposite. Why doesn't Putin join NATO? Ah yes, because he's a controlling, murderous, dictator thug, and NATO threatens that.
This isn't about being wrong like Trump says, it's about being right. NATO interrupts the authoritarian desires that both of them have. The difference is, one already has it, and the other doesn't. If Trump could align with Putin, they would essentially be free to destroy Democracy totally. That's what this is all about. Only a blind man wouldn't see it.
Let's leave it at the fact that the Supreme Court wouldn't enforce the United States Constitution.
Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.
I can provide it.
The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required. Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)
supreme.justia.com
But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes
Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.
Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.
Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law
that article is in 2022…obama isn’t president
but i am impressed that in 2022 that xiden did
well Mueller said the same thing..why do you think he’s a liar?
or maybe the liar is Adam Shifty that said he had the evidence but for some reason refuses to share it
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
