MSN: 12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

NightFox

Wildling
Jul 20, 2013
11,549
3,219
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.
 
Not if the DNC, D pols, and the MSM had not conspired to screw Bernie.
 
Not if the DNC, D pols, and the MSM had not conspired to screw Bernie.

Yeah but Bernie was just begging to be screwed, if the Clintonites hadn't engineered his undoing somebody else would have. After all he's got that completely dazed and confused "My brain is trapped in the 1960's and I'm begging for the world to just get it over with and fuck me sideways" package down to a TEE.

If Bernie appeared in an episode of Star Trek TOS he'd be that nameless crewman that YOU KNOW is gonna get waxed as soon as he beams down to the planet.:D
 
Not if the DNC, D pols, and the MSM had not conspired to screw Bernie.

Yeah but Bernie was just begging to be screwed, if the Clintonites hadn't engineered his undoing somebody else would have. After all he's got that completely dazed and confused "My brain is trapped in the 1960's and I'm begging for the world to just get it over with and fuck me sideways" package down to a TEE.

If Bernie appeared in an episode of Star Trek TOS he'd be that nameless crewman that YOU KNOW is gonna get waxed as soon as he beams down to the planet.:D

No doubt Bernie is screwy but had the Ds not screwed him and he won the nomination, he likely beats Trump.
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

40 - 40 tie? With 20% undecided?

Oh, here's a newsflash...Trump won't get to run against HRC in 2020.
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

Trump’s popularity is falling in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

40 - 40 tie? With 20% undecided?

Oh, here's a newsflash...Trump won't get to run against HRC in 2020.

Shrug.

He essentially has the 2020 election locked up. You'll see next year.

The Democrats have no one and nothing to offer.
 

LOL, That's nice but it appears he'd still beat your girl in a heads up rematch....

Don't let it get you down though, there's another election coming up in 2020 and the DNC will pick some other scumbag whose crotch you can suck on while fawning like the mindless politician worshiping droid that you are.

I didn't support Hillary and told people years ago that she was a bad choice. So stop lying.

WTF is this, RWnut Lie Tuesday?
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

40 - 40 tie? With 20% undecided?

Oh, here's a newsflash...Trump won't get to run against HRC in 2020.

Shrug.

He essentially has the 2020 election locked up. You'll see next year.

The Democrats have no one and nothing to offer.

You're not even good at trolling.
 
Shrug.

He essentially has the 2020 election locked up. You'll see next year.

The Democrats have no one and nothing to offer.

Cool, as long as I get some new post election partisan freak out videos I don't give a damn who wins.

"Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose. Winning or losing is all one organic mechanism, from which one extracts what one needs. " -- Gloria Clemente, White Men Can't Jump
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

Trump’s popularity is falling in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan
Vox?!
 
Source: MSN.COM

12 months later, Trump would probably still win the 2016 election

"The Washington Post-ABC News poll asked respondents how they'd vote in a redo of the 2016 election, and, if anything, Clinton seems to have lost more ground than Trump. Among those who voted, 46 percent say they picked Clinton last year and 43 percent picked Trump — a slightly more favorable sample than the 2016 election, in which Clinton won the popular vote by two percentage points. But in a head-to-head rematch, Clinton's support drops even more than Trump's does, and they wind up in a 40-40 tie. Given that Trump overperformed in key, blue-leaning swing states, that means he'd probably have won again
.
"

"Interestingly, Clinton actually seems to have lost that ground because of disillusioned Democrats. Even as the Trump presidency has unified the Democratic Party against him and his policies, just 72 percent of Democrats said they would vote for Clinton in a rematch — vs. the 84 percent who said they did vote for Clinton last year. Trump's share of the Republican Party, meanwhile, dropped just five points from 89 percent who said they did vote for him to 84 percent who said they would do it again."

Yes, Democrats, the Duchess of Whitewater was really that bad of a candidate....she not only lost to Trump once but these polls indicate that she'd lose again, you lemmings-D should just let the Republicans pick your Presidential candidates for you, you'd be better off.

I'm all for a rematch of 2016, those videos of the Pro-Clinton Politician Worshipers losing their minds when Trump won were priceless and I want some new ones to laugh at.

40 - 40 tie? With 20% undecided?

Oh, here's a newsflash...Trump won't get to run against HRC in 2020.

Shrug.

He essentially has the 2020 election locked up. You'll see next year.

The Democrats have no one and nothing to offer.

You're not even good at trolling.

You're not exactly cheerleading for the Dems, eh? Tell us, what do they have to offer?
 

LOL, That's nice but it appears he'd still beat your girl in a heads up rematch....

Don't let it get you down though, there's another election coming up in 2020 and the DNC will pick some other scumbag whose crotch you can suck on while fawning like the mindless politician worshiping droid that you are.

I didn't support Hillary and told people years ago that she was a bad choice. So stop lying.
LOL! yeah right :rolleyes:

It's amazing how many ass licking, Democrat partisan pom-pom waivers are disavowing the Queen of Corruption AFTER the election, It almost makes me feel sorry for her.
 

LOL, That's nice but it appears he'd still beat your girl in a heads up rematch....

Don't let it get you down though, there's another election coming up in 2020 and the DNC will pick some other scumbag whose crotch you can suck on while fawning like the mindless politician worshiping droid that you are.

I didn't support Hillary and told people years ago that she was a bad choice. So stop lying.
LOL! yeah right :rolleyes:

It's amazing how many ass licking, Democrat partisan pom-pom waivers are disavowing the Queen of Corruption AFTER the election, It almost makes me feel sorry for her.


opposed to electing a crook who cant even keep his own party in his favor long enough to pass major legislation ?

continue to eat the peanuts out of his shitpile, and continue to get the same results - winnerboi.
 
He won by a landslide last year. He'll approach reagan landslide numbers in 2020.

41 promised not to raise taxes, he broke that promise and became a 1 term wonder..

if not keeping promises is any indication of future election results TRUMP IS FUCKED.
 

LOL, That's nice but it appears he'd still beat your girl in a heads up rematch....

Don't let it get you down though, there's another election coming up in 2020 and the DNC will pick some other scumbag whose crotch you can suck on while fawning like the mindless politician worshiping droid that you are.

I didn't support Hillary and told people years ago that she was a bad choice. So stop lying.
LOL! yeah right :rolleyes:

It's amazing how many ass licking, Democrat partisan pom-pom waivers are disavowing the Queen of Corruption AFTER the election, It almost makes me feel sorry for her.


opposed to electing a crook who cant even keep his own party in his favor long enough to pass major legislation ?
.

LOL, we were getting a crook in the White House no matter which asshole won the election, at least Trump and his massive reality distortion field are somewhat humorous.

.... Now that we've gotten the "my miscreant is better than their miscreant" nonsense out of the way, you can get back to your favorite pastime, politician-D ass licking.
 
Hillary Clinton, was the perfect candidate for Trump to run against. Her closet was so stuffed with skeletons, they were sure to spill out of the closet.
The Democrats have Wasserman-Schultz to blame and then there were the Hillary-true-believers.
Overall, there were very slim pickings for legitimate willing candidates in 2016 for the Dems. I guess they believe in Hillary, bad mistake.
If the Trump trend continues and if the Dems can find a legitimate candidate, who understands the voters that Trump's policies are leaving behind, Trump will be done in 2020.
 

LOL, That's nice but it appears he'd still beat your girl in a heads up rematch....

Don't let it get you down though, there's another election coming up in 2020 and the DNC will pick some other scumbag whose crotch you can suck on while fawning like the mindless politician worshiping droid that you are.

I didn't support Hillary and told people years ago that she was a bad choice. So stop lying.
LOL! yeah right :rolleyes:

It's amazing how many ass licking, Democrat partisan pom-pom waivers are disavowing the Queen of Corruption AFTER the election, It almost makes me feel sorry for her.


opposed to electing a crook who cant even keep his own party in his favor long enough to pass major legislation ?
.

LOL, we were getting a crook in the White House no matter which asshole won the election, at least Trump and his massive reality distortion field are somewhat humorous.

.... Now that we've gotten the "my miscreant is better than their miscreant" nonsense out of the way, you can get back to your favorite pastime, politician-D ass licking.

idget- write this down ... for the 999th time, I didnt vote for Obama or Clinton.

because someone is anti-Trump doesnt make them a Dem,

but it does make you a blockhead for thinking it does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top