Mueller hires ANOTHER Trump Hating prosecutor

[JoeB131]

Incorrect... vast numbers of quite sensible Americans view perjury before a grand jury and obstruction of justice to be very serious matters.

Actually, at the time, 70% of Americans thought that impeachment was uncalled for. And Clinton didn't lie to a grand jury, he lied in a court in a preliminary hearing in a case that was dismissed as having no legal merit.

When they finally dragged the poor man in front of a grand jury, he admitted he had a relationship with Ms. Lewinsky.

youthful intern barely old enough to know better... highly impressionable... overawed by power.

Lewinsky was 22 years old and a college graduate when she was an intern. We let 22 year old college grads lead men into combat!

Clinton wasn't even the first guy she had sex with.

1. unrelated - has nothing to do with Clinton's disgraceful behavior in a position of public trust, his lying before a grand jury, or his impeachment afterwards

You keep saying that, but he didn't lie in front of a grand jury.

 

[Kondor3]

I just BET you would be this calm and fine about this is your precious messiah negro Obama was being investigated by forces that despised him eh?

I'm sure if there was something to investigate him for other than bizarre conspiracy theories, your boys in Congress would have done it.

Or maybe they learned their lesson from trying to impeach Clinton over a blow job.

They didn't impeach Clinton for a blowjob.

They impeached Clinton for lying about it.

BIg difference.

Actually there isn't

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

 

[Kondor3]

...You keep saying that, but he didn't lie in front of a grand jury.

"...Upon the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228–206 vote)[18] and obstruction of justice (by a 221–212 vote)..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The House impeached him on two charges... perjury being one of them.

The Senate failed to convict.

-----------------------------------------------------

But that's not the subject of this thread...

 

[rightwinger]

1313 Mockingbird Lane
You can call me at 867-5309

City, State and Zip, please.

Take your pick.

1313 Mockingbird Ln,Edmond, OK 73034
3 beds 2 baths 1,832 sqft

1313 Mockingbird Ln,The Villages, FL 32163
-- beds -- baths 1,939 sqft

1313 Mockingbird LnAustin, TX 78701

• 5 beds
  
• 4 baths
  
• 5,567 sqft
  
• 23,454 sqft lot size
  
• Single-Family Home

You guys are amazing ...

1313 Mockingbird Lane was the address of the home of the Munsters.

867-5309 was the title of a 1981 song written by Alex Call and Jim Keller and performed by Tommy Tutone

You been had ... and you don't even know it.

Jenny, you got my number

 

[rightwinger]

I just BET you would be this calm and fine about this is your precious messiah negro Obama was being investigated by forces that despised him eh?

I'm sure if there was something to investigate him for other than bizarre conspiracy theories, your boys in Congress would have done it.

Or maybe they learned their lesson from trying to impeach Clinton over a blow job.

They didn't impeach Clinton for a blowjob.

They impeached Clinton for lying about it.

BIg difference.

Actually there isn't

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Clinton was impeached on political overreach
Republicans once again overplaying a weak hand

Trump? we shall see, we shall see

 

[JoeB131]

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Uh, guy, let's get real. Besides the fact that that he didn't lie to a "Grand Jury", anyone who has been involved in a civil suit tells you that most witnesses are prepped by lawyers to admit only what they have to and no more.

Fact is, a lot of men don't consider a blow job or a hand job to be "sex". Sex is when you have genital to genital contact. so Clinton could argue when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman, he really didn't.

Blow jobs are the new third base.

 

[JoeB131]

The House impeached him on two charges... perjury being one of them.

The Senate failed to convict.

You can say that, but it still doesnt' make it true.

What specifically did he lie about to the grand jury. Because the fact that the Senate - including 10 Republicans - voted to acquit him says the case wasn't made.

 

[rightwinger]

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Uh, guy, let's get real. Besides the fact that that he didn't lie to a "Grand Jury", anyone who has been involved in a civil suit tells you that most witnesses are prepped by lawyers to admit only what they have to and no more.

Fact is, a lot of men don't consider a blow job or a hand job to be "sex". Sex is when you have genital to genital contact. so Clinton could argue when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman, he really didn't.

Blow jobs are the new third base.

A blow job is not sex

You can give or receive a blow job and still be a virgin

 

[bripat9643]

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Uh, guy, let's get real. Besides the fact that that he didn't lie to a "Grand Jury", anyone who has been involved in a civil suit tells you that most witnesses are prepped by lawyers to admit only what they have to and no more.

Fact is, a lot of men don't consider a blow job or a hand job to be "sex". Sex is when you have genital to genital contact. so Clinton could argue when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman, he really didn't.

Blow jobs are the new third base.

A blow job is not sex

You can give or receive a blow job and still be a virgin

Watching all you snowflake douche bags twisting the English language into knots in a fruitless attempt to excuse your scumbag rapist president is utterly hilarious.

 

[driveby]

Hey oldlady, how about Hillary's illegal server and mishandling classified info? How did Comey know her "intent"? That was disgraceful, disgusting, and a sham.

Except her server wasn't illegal. Condi Rice and Colin Powell used private email as well on PUBLIC servers.

You guys tried to make up a crime where none existed.

Hillary's server wasn't public. You moonbats don't even try to hide stupidity anymore........

 

[rightwinger]

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Uh, guy, let's get real. Besides the fact that that he didn't lie to a "Grand Jury", anyone who has been involved in a civil suit tells you that most witnesses are prepped by lawyers to admit only what they have to and no more.

Fact is, a lot of men don't consider a blow job or a hand job to be "sex". Sex is when you have genital to genital contact. so Clinton could argue when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman, he really didn't.

Blow jobs are the new third base.

A blow job is not sex

You can give or receive a blow job and still be a virgin

Watching all you snowflake douche bags twisting the English language into knots in a fruitless attempt to excuse your scumbag rapist president is utterly hilarious.

It's biology

A blowjob does not get ya pregnant

 

[driveby]

Hey oldlady, how about Hillary's illegal server and mishandling classified info? How did Comey know her "intent"? That was disgraceful, disgusting, and a sham.

That has been investigated. Why don't you look up the findings from that? Here's a hint........no evidence of wrong doing.

Absolutely no evidence of criminal wrong doing that she could be prosecuted for by any prosecutor in the USA is what was said!!

She did break some rules though, that were not criminal, just breaking protocol rules, but usually the person at the very top is not subject to most of those rules...at least in a nod and a wink way...., other than a slap of hand at most, just like a CEO position...they can do what they want and not worry about work guidelines if they do not want to... for whatever their business reason...

just like when President Trump broke protocol and declassified top secret information and gave it to the Russians during his oval office, white house meeting with them... it was a no no, but regardless of protocol, it was okay cuz he's the chief executive.

Trump likely didn't do it himself, but his campaign team might have broken some laws of the land...should they get a pass? NO, OF COURSE NOT...unless, it, whatever 'it' might be, was done unwittingly, then a PASS might be warranted.

Trump did not 'collude' with Russia on anything. It's gonna cost Taxpayers $Millions to find out what is already known. There was no 'Russian Hacking' of our Election. That's absolute sore loser Democrat Bullshite. They couldn't beat Trump at the ballot box, so they're trying to carry out a Coup d'etat by way of manufacturing numerous 'scandals.' But I truly believe most Americans recognize what the Democrats are doing. It'll likely backfire on em. I hope so anyway.

Trump likely didn't do it himself, but his campaign team might have broken some laws of the land...should they get a pass? NO, OF COURSE NOT...unless, it, whatever 'it' might be, was done unwittingly, then a PASS might be warranted...

He's not hiring all of these expert prosecutors to lead various parts of the investigation, if there was NOTHING... These experts would not leave their regular jobs for a one week job with the govt.... there is a big job ahead of all of them....! I don't think this is going to be over, anytime soon...

President Trump truly needs to stay out of this, and let them do the job they were hired to do and stop interfering with this investigation....the sooner he does stop his interference, the sooner it will be over....the less that would be said about it in the media....

President Trump has been acting like he is guilty of something with all of his obstruction and wild goose chases he's sent the media on... he's just been crazy!

He needs to stop his antics...the sooner the better!

No one 'Colluded' with Russia on 'Hacking' our Election. It is a witch hunt. Were some connected with his Campaign in communication with Russia? Probably. But that's not uncommon. It certainly isn't an 'Impeachable' offense. It's gonna cost Taxpayers several $Millions to find out what it is already known. It's just a shameful Democrat Coup d'etat attempt. Manufactured B.S.

You spout the Trump and Russian propaganda quite well! :bravo:

YOU DO NOT KNOW one way or the other on the collusion, or other crimes that may have been committed by them, as with the New Hires show, the criminal investigation is just getting off the ground....even if the Russian election interference counter intelligence part is close to being Over.

No, it is NOT NORMAL for a campaign team to have so so so many meetings and conversations with the Russians, it not normal for these bright Trump staff to lie about these meetings or Trump to lie about the connections.

Do you remember when Trump was caught on a hot mic telling a Russian official that he'll have a lot more flexibility after the election? Oh wait........

Do you remember when Trump's SOS facilitated a uranium deal with Russia? Oh wait.....



And let's not forget these gems:

 

[JoeB131]

Watching all you snowflake douche bags twisting the English language into knots in a fruitless attempt to excuse your scumbag rapist president is utterly hilarious.

not at all. No one ever got pregnant from a blow job.

Since Sex is the act of reproduction, a blow job isn't sex. At least from a certain point of view.

What went on between Clinton and these golddiggers isn't really relevant to anything.

 

[JoeB131]

Do you remember when Trump was caught on a hot mic telling a Russian official that he'll have a lot more flexibility after the election? Oh wait........

Yes, I remember that bit of candor of two presidents admitting that big deals couldn't be made before an election.

Do you remember when Trump's SOS facilitated a uranium deal with Russia? Oh wait.....

You mean a deal with an international consortium that was approved by no less than 7 government agencies? Yes, I remember that. Why it takes 7 government agencies to approve selling something you dig up out of the ground is distressing.

And let's not forget these gems:

Okay, so what was wrong with either of these statements?

 

[JoeB131]

It's biology

A blowjob does not get ya pregnant

I don't think BriPat understands biology.

 

[driveby]

Do you remember when Trump was caught on a hot mic telling a Russian official that he'll have a lot more flexibility after the election? Oh wait........

Yes, I remember that bit of candor of two presidents admitting that big deals couldn't be made before an election.

Do you remember when Trump's SOS facilitated a uranium deal with Russia? Oh wait.....

You mean a deal with an international consortium that was approved by no less than 7 government agencies? Yes, I remember that. Why it takes 7 government agencies to approve selling something you dig up out of the ground is distressing.

And let's not forget these gems:

Okay, so what was wrong with either of these statements?

I got it, you're posting this from you Saturday spin class.........

 

[bripat9643]

Lying before a grand jury is a crime - even if the underlying situation was jaywalking.

Obstruction of justice is also a crime.

Clinton was impeached by the US House of Representatives for both.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton

The crime isn't in the jaywalking (or the blowjob)...

The crime is in the commission of perjury before a grand jury, in connection with that jaywalking or blowjob.

Your unwillingness or inability to either discern or admit the difference is irrelevant.

Uh, guy, let's get real. Besides the fact that that he didn't lie to a "Grand Jury", anyone who has been involved in a civil suit tells you that most witnesses are prepped by lawyers to admit only what they have to and no more.

Fact is, a lot of men don't consider a blow job or a hand job to be "sex". Sex is when you have genital to genital contact. so Clinton could argue when he said he didn't have sexual relations with that woman, he really didn't.

Blow jobs are the new third base.

A blow job is not sex

You can give or receive a blow job and still be a virgin

Watching all you snowflake douche bags twisting the English language into knots in a fruitless attempt to excuse your scumbag rapist president is utterly hilarious.

It's biology

A blowjob does not get ya pregnant

So you're OK with your daughter giving blowjobs to strange men?

 

[bripat9643]

It's biology

A blowjob does not get ya pregnant

I don't think BriPat understands biology.

I understand common sense, which is something you are desperately trying to ignore to excuse your rapist president.

 

[Care4all]

That has been investigated. Why don't you look up the findings from that? Here's a hint........no evidence of wrong doing.

Absolutely no evidence of criminal wrong doing that she could be prosecuted for by any prosecutor in the USA is what was said!!

She did break some rules though, that were not criminal, just breaking protocol rules, but usually the person at the very top is not subject to most of those rules...at least in a nod and a wink way...., other than a slap of hand at most, just like a CEO position...they can do what they want and not worry about work guidelines if they do not want to... for whatever their business reason...

just like when President Trump broke protocol and declassified top secret information and gave it to the Russians during his oval office, white house meeting with them... it was a no no, but regardless of protocol, it was okay cuz he's the chief executive.

Trump likely didn't do it himself, but his campaign team might have broken some laws of the land...should they get a pass? NO, OF COURSE NOT...unless, it, whatever 'it' might be, was done unwittingly, then a PASS might be warranted.

Trump did not 'collude' with Russia on anything. It's gonna cost Taxpayers $Millions to find out what is already known. There was no 'Russian Hacking' of our Election. That's absolute sore loser Democrat Bullshite. They couldn't beat Trump at the ballot box, so they're trying to carry out a Coup d'etat by way of manufacturing numerous 'scandals.' But I truly believe most Americans recognize what the Democrats are doing. It'll likely backfire on em. I hope so anyway.

Trump likely didn't do it himself, but his campaign team might have broken some laws of the land...should they get a pass? NO, OF COURSE NOT...unless, it, whatever 'it' might be, was done unwittingly, then a PASS might be warranted...

He's not hiring all of these expert prosecutors to lead various parts of the investigation, if there was NOTHING... These experts would not leave their regular jobs for a one week job with the govt.... there is a big job ahead of all of them....! I don't think this is going to be over, anytime soon...

President Trump truly needs to stay out of this, and let them do the job they were hired to do and stop interfering with this investigation....the sooner he does stop his interference, the sooner it will be over....the less that would be said about it in the media....

President Trump has been acting like he is guilty of something with all of his obstruction and wild goose chases he's sent the media on... he's just been crazy!

He needs to stop his antics...the sooner the better!

No one 'Colluded' with Russia on 'Hacking' our Election. It is a witch hunt. Were some connected with his Campaign in communication with Russia? Probably. But that's not uncommon. It certainly isn't an 'Impeachable' offense. It's gonna cost Taxpayers several $Millions to find out what it is already known. It's just a shameful Democrat Coup d'etat attempt. Manufactured B.S.

You spout the Trump and Russian propaganda quite well! :bravo:

YOU DO NOT KNOW one way or the other on the collusion, or other crimes that may have been committed by them, as with the New Hires show, the criminal investigation is just getting off the ground....even if the Russian election interference counter intelligence part is close to being Over.

No, it is NOT NORMAL for a campaign team to have so so so many meetings and conversations with the Russians, it not normal for these bright Trump staff to lie about these meetings or Trump to lie about the connections.

Do you remember when Trump was caught on a hot mic telling a Russian official that he'll have a lot more flexibility after the election? Oh wait........

Do you remember when Trump's SOS facilitated a uranium deal with Russia? Oh wait.....



And let's not forget these gems:

I remember Obama being cautious not to overstep his bounds on future foreign policy before he WON his reelection, with the Russian PresidentMedvedev/Putin....

I KNOW that Obama's SOS DID NOT facilitate the sale of the Uranium mine to Russians.

There were 9 Department Heads that had to approve the sale, no one head more powerful than another, along with the Nuclear poliferation division....and then Obama having the final say....

AND NONE OF THIS BOTHERS ME, because NONE, not a nano ounce of Uranium from this mining operation that the Russians bought, can leave the USA....it ALL STAYS HERE.

And I have no idea why the right wing is even hanging on to their propaganda bs on this?

 

[JoeB131]

So you're OK with your daughter giving blowjobs to strange men?

I think that would be her choice, wouldn't it? At least once she's a legal adult.

Yeah, I'd like to think I would have raised her better to not see a married man and all, but frankly, given half of marriages involve some sort of adultery, we have to realize we live in the real world.

I understand common sense, which is something you are desperately trying to ignore to excuse your rapist president.

I'm sorry, when was Clinton convicted of rape? When did anyone bring forward a provable claim of rape.

Not Juanita Brodderick. She changed her story multiple times, couldn't cite the date that the rape happened, (because that could be checked) couldn't remember the room number of the hotel it happened at, and signed two affadavitts denying it happened.

If you want to apply the Clinton standard to your boy Trump, we should be marching him out in handcuffs right now.