Mueller WILL NOT Present Collusion Evidence At Manafort Trial

The meeting was supposed to be about dirt involving Clinton.


Thank you, moron......THAT is the very definition of collusion.........It matters not if the meetings was successful....Find someone with more brain cells than you have to explain it to you.........LOL
 
How can you present something that doesn't exist?


Of course Mueller is not going to present evidence of collusion, when the charges against Manafort are defrauding Banks and laundering 170 million dollars, along with conspiracy against the United States. This is one Federal Grand Jury.

The other Federal Grand Jury is the Russian collusion of which Mueller has accumulated 5 guilty plea's, 19 Federal Grand Jury indictments, that are certain to produce more. Mueller is going to wait until Democrats are sworn in as majority leaders in either 1 or both houses of congress and he will hand over the collusion evidence to them at that time. He will not give it to a Republican majority congress, whom are terrified of their reich wing base, and who would just bury it. When Democrats are sworn in as majority leaders in one or both houses, the open public hearings and testimony will begin, and the impeachment proceedings will ensue. This will begin on January 20, 2019.
Blue wave coming this November 2018

At this link, you can read one article, watch 2 FOX NEWS video's and another of Trump admitting to Obstruction of Justice on National T.V.

Go to this link, then scroll down to post # 56
It’s Russia, Russia, Russia

image038-4.jpg


Ignorance, denial & Sean Hannity are not going to save Trump.
For all the real news you have not been told over the last year & a half, a good book to play catch up with is this. It will prepare you for the open public hearings and testimony.

51j3PYLWxaL._SY346_.jpg

There is nothing like admitting guilt in these statements.
Republicans Will Support Trump’s Impeachment If Democrats Win Midterms, Republican Says • r/BlueMidterm2018
Trump: If Dems win in 2018 midterms, they'll impeach me
Republicans warn Trump could be impeached if Democrats win the midterm elections

For more informating regarding the Russian investigation on this board go to these links.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions may be facing perjury charges.
Carter Page-Trump campaign adviser-testifies he met with Russian government officials in July 2016.
Do Russian oligarchs own Trump and his empire?
Mueller already has collusion & obstruction of justice--he's going after this Trump russian mob now.
Most damaging evidence of Russian collusion with Trump campaign released today




 
Last edited:
The meeting was supposed to be about dirt involving Clinton.


Thank you, moron......THAT is the very definition of collusion.........It matters not if the meetings was successful....Find someone with more brain cells than you have to explain it to you.........LOL


Stop acting like that meeting was illegal, it wasn't.


.
 
The meeting was supposed to be about dirt involving Clinton.


Thank you, moron......THAT is the very definition of collusion.........It matters not if the meetings was successful....Find someone with more brain cells than you have to explain it to you.........LOL

What I find totally amazing is that while you on the left think that the Trump campaign seeking out "dirt" on Hillary Clinton in the middle of a political campaign is somehow illegal but that Hillary Clinton's campaign paying someone to make up fake "dossiers" about Trump and leak them to a compliant media isn't! How does that work exactly, Nat? :confused-84::confused-84::confused-84::confused-84:
 
The meeting was supposed to be about dirt involving Clinton.


Thank you, moron......THAT is the very definition of collusion.........It matters not if the meetings was successful....Find someone with more brain cells than you have to explain it to you.........LOL
For the 1000th time, moron, "collusion" isn't against the law. Listening to people talk is not a crime, no matter who they are. Even if the person talking is a well known criminal like Hillary.
 
Stop acting like that meeting was illegal, it wasn't.


For you and other IGNORANT Trump cult members

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from giving anything of value to a campaign engaged in a U.S. election. It’s also a crime to solicit a foreign national to do so, or even to knowingly provide substantial assistance in receiving something of value.

Foreign nationals | FEC
 
What I find totally amazing is that while you on the left think that the Trump campaign seeking out "dirt" on Hillary Clinton in the middle of a political campaign is somehow illegal but that Hillary Clinton's campaign paying someone to make up fake "dossiers" about Trump and leak them to a compliant media isn't! How does that work exactly, Nat?

For you and other IGNORANT Trump cult members

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from giving anything of value to a campaign engaged in a U.S. election. It’s also a crime to solicit a foreign national to do so, or even to knowingly provide substantial assistance in receiving something of value.

Foreign nationals | FEC
 
For the 1000th time, moron, "collusion" isn't against the law. Listening to people talk is not a crime, no matter who they are. Even if the person talking is a well known criminal like Hillary.

For you and other IGNORANT Trump cult members

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from giving anything of value to a campaign engaged in a U.S. election. It’s also a crime to solicit a foreign national to do so, or even to knowingly provide substantial assistance in receiving something of value.

Foreign nationals | FEC
 
Stop acting like that meeting was illegal, it wasn't.


For you and other IGNORANT Trump cult members

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from giving anything of value to a campaign engaged in a U.S. election. It’s also a crime to solicit a foreign national to do so, or even to knowingly provide substantial assistance in receiving something of value.

Foreign nationals | FEC
You mean like selling a dossier to Hillary on Trump?
 
Mueller has no evidence of 'collusion'. Hard to present something that never existed....
 
You mean like selling a dossier to Hillary on Trump?


You want to "lock her up".......GO FOR IT.....

Do you also want to lock up Trump???.....Otherwise you'd a be a hypocritical scumbag, don't you think?????.......(or do you EVER "think").............LOL
 
You mean like selling a dossier to Hillary on Trump?


You want to "lock her up".......GO FOR IT.....

Do you also want to lock up Trump???.....Otherwise you'd a be a hypocritical scumbag, don't you think?????.......(or do you EVER "think").............LOL
It's too late to lock her up, not worth the effort. She's on Death's doorstep. No point to locking her up.
No reason to lock Trump up. He hasn't done anything that deserves criminal prosecution.
 
Mueller has no evidence of 'collusion'. Hard to present something that never existed...

Gee.........Isn't Mueller going after "obstruction of justice"????

BUT, nice try, Queasy.....Haniity would be proud.......LOL
 
It's too late to lock her up, not worth the effort. She's on Death's doorstep. No point to locking her up.
No reason to lock Trump up. He hasn't done anything that deserves criminal prosecution.


Here.....drink up.....and happy swallowing.....lol

upload_2018-7-9_10-1-49.png
 
Gee.........Isn't Mueller going after "obstruction of justice"????

No have the memory of a goldfish - the goldfish's memory is natural, though - it can't help it. Yours is 'SELECTIVE'.

Mueller was originally tasked with investigating Russian interference. 'Obstruction' was just one of the many 'spin-off' angles / roads he took every time he found a dead-end with no crime.

'Obstruction'? Did you 'forget' also that Rosenstein made the case for why Comey should be fired, not to mention that Trump had every Constitutional right to do so.

Another straw attempted to be grasped....another Witch Hunt FAILURE.
 
Mueller was originally tasked with investigating Russian interference. 'Obstruction' was just one of the many 'spin-off' angles / roads he took every time he found a dead-end with no crime.


below is not for you.....you're too fucking stupid to understand......but for others


The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and

(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).


(i) and (ii) are pretty banal. However, (iii) is interesting because it is also mentioned later in the document. Reading the relevant section of the CFR:

§ 600.6 Powers and authority.

Subject to the limitations in the following paragraphs, the Special Counsel shall exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney. Except as provided in this part, the Special Counsel shall determine whether and to what extent to inform or consult with the Attorney General or others within the Department about the conduct of his or her duties and responsibilities.

………………

(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.

www.law.cornell.edu/…
 
Stop acting like that meeting was illegal, it wasn't.


For you and other IGNORANT Trump cult members

Federal law prohibits a foreign national from giving anything of value to a campaign engaged in a U.S. election. It’s also a crime to solicit a foreign national to do so, or even to knowingly provide substantial assistance in receiving something of value.

Foreign nationals | FEC


Ok, now show exactly how that meeting violated any of those provisions. It was the campaign that was solicited, to my knowledge the campaign didn't provide so much as cab fare to anyone in the meeting and nothing of value was exchanged. So where's the violation?


.
 
Ok, now show exactly how that meeting violated any of those provisions. It was the campaign that was solicited, to my knowledge the campaign didn't provide so much as cab fare to anyone in the meeting and nothing of value was exchanged. So where's the violation?


Forget it Tigger.......All is "well" on that cesspool that is Trump's administration.

You morons are too fucking drunk in the orange kool-aid anyway......LOL
 
Mueller was originally tasked with investigating Russian interference. 'Obstruction' was just one of the many 'spin-off' angles / roads he took every time he found a dead-end with no crime.


below is not for you.....you're too fucking stupid to understand......but for others


The Special Counsel is authorized to conduct the investigation confirmed by then-FBI Director James B. Comey in testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on March 20, 2017

(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump; and

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation; and

(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).


(i) and (ii) are pretty banal. However, (iii) is interesting because it is also mentioned later in the document. Reading the relevant section of the CFR:

§ 600.6 Powers and authority.

Subject to the limitations in the following paragraphs, the Special Counsel shall exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney. Except as provided in this part, the Special Counsel shall determine whether and to what extent to inform or consult with the Attorney General or others within the Department about the conduct of his or her duties and responsibilities.

………………

(c) If the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.

www.law.cornell.edu/…

Hillary: $100 Million from KGB Bank
- That damn, Trump!

Bill Clinton: $550k from KGB Bank, met directly with Putin
- Than damn, Trump!

Hillary's Campaign manger's Company ' board of directors made 1/3rd up of prominent Russian businessmen who had direct lines to Putin and the Kremlin; took thousands of unreported shares of Russian stocks
- Than damn, Trump!

John Podesta's Brother worked for both the KGB Bank and Russian Intel Collection Agency
- Than damn, Trump!

Hillary colluded with and paid foreign spies and Russians for a propaganda-filled report she illegally used in an election
- Than damn, Trump!


Bwuhahahaha
 
The investigation just needs to go a few more months until the elections. Throw how some red meat as to give the appearance of something
nefarious that the Trump administration is guilty of.
The result hopefully will be maximum damage in the midterms with no time to refute with the actual truth.
Straight from the democrat playbook.
 

Forum List

Back
Top