muellers indictment is typical democrat play to effect November elections....

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

Nothing you accuse Mueller of is worse than colluding with Russia to fuck over our democracy.
 
Hasn't the Uranium1 thing been well-publicized for years? It's just been dug up again because Trump needs people to focus on Hillary.
 
I love the words "MAY" and "Might" used by every single outlet reporting this except FOX who has been reporting responsibly that they do not have credible information as to who might be in the sights...
You mean “except Fox, who will fall on their swords before ever allowing anything but praise for the dear leader to appear on their network.”

Fox News report in 2018: “Trump Still Winning! Best Checkers Player in San Quentin!”


Wow....your post was so good I am going to email it to President hilary.....or was that President Jeb Bush........or how about we mail it to the NFL......the ones that thought they could take on Trump too.....or hollywood, the ones who tried to smear him with sexual harrassment....how is that going for them now?

You guys...please.....keep underestimating Trump......we need more democrats kicked out of office...
Hollywood will have record revenue again, Jeb Bush is a moron that you loved until Trump told you to stop, the NFL will have record revenue again, and Hillary is still living inside your head.
"Hollywood will have record revenue again,"

IS that why they posted a 15% loss in revenue last quarter? LOL retard!

Star Wars will save them in December.
 
Mueller leaked the indictment of Friday to make that the topic of weekend
political shows and get the spotlight off of him and the rest of Zero's and HRC's
crooks.

Somebody had to do something to put focus back on this investigation.

If his indictment isn't about Russia then Trump will have a field day on twitter
and the AMERICAN PEOPLE are gonna start asking..."I thought this was about
Russian Collusion."

The FBI undercover agent testifies in roughly two weeks before Congress.

After that the Federal Marshals maybe coming to arrest Mueller.

Federal Marshals don't usually arrest people. That is not their purpose.

The FBI does.
 
Still waiting on what the major elections are in 2017 that this will affect...

I'd like to know why the Uranium 1 deal was so important, as seeing a Congressman was on the news and said that NONE of the Uranium is allowed to leave the U.S.
 
Mueller a Republican......check
Mueller appointed by Republicans....check
Republicans control all three branches of government.....check


Well, that's crystal clear. It's the Democrats' fault!!!!! View attachment 157210 DO SOMETHING!

Mueller appointed all kinds of Democrat donors to his staff...check!

Mueller was in office during the Uranium One fiasco yet did nothing...check!
 
The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

Why didn't you say that when Comey's letter to congressional leaders was leaked by them, saying Clinton was under FBI investigation;.
 
The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

Why didn't you say that when Comey's letter to congressional leaders was leaked by them, saying Clinton was under FBI investigation;.

There is no reason to say that it was leaked, because it is not a secret. He sent the letter because it contradicted what he had reported to Congress earlier.
 
Somehow Manifort got hired by Trump.....and it appears he's the target.
But, the media will make it look like Trump has something to do with whatever Manifort did before he hired him.
 
Federal Marshals don't usually arrest people. That is not their purpose.

The FBI does.
Federal Arrest Warrants | Surrendering to Law Enforcement

Most of the time, if a federal judge or magistrate has issued a warrant for your arrest, you find out about it when law enforcement officers arrest you.

If you learn that a federal warrant has been issued for your arrest, you should contact an attorney immediately. Unless you want to spend your life living as a fugitive, it is always better to surrender to the U.S. Marshal’s Office than it is to wait for them to find you and arrest you.

The best way to surrender is to retain a lawyer who will contact the U.S. Marshal’s Office on your behalf. Your lawyer can arrange for the time and place of your surrender. In some cases, the Marshal’s Office will want to arrest you before you have a chance to surrender, even if they know that you plan to surrender
 
There is no reason to say that it was leaked, because it is not a secret. He sent the letter because it contradicted what he had reported to Congress earlier.

It was a letter to congress. If Comey wanted it made public, he would have released it. Instead the republicans in congress leaked the letter. Just like the professor who leaked Comeys notes, which as you pointed out, were not secret either.
 
People are hearing about UraniumOne "crime" and the gag order removal, so that should heat things up.
A new grand-jury or special prosecutor to investigate the "dossier" and UraniumOne should balance things out.
Most voters get that selling US uranium to Russia is way worse than " a bullshit colluding charge"

Interesting how things boomerang themselves right back around to those liberal democrats, just like when Hillary Clinton tries to claim the moral high ground ( that’s a good one :lol: ) over Trumps discussions. Now look what happens to come out of Hollywood as well, and funding to support Democrats no less. Apparently Liberals are going to be knowing the word “Karma”, very well this year. Never let a crisis go to waste they said? No, we don’t intend to let this one go for quite a while.
 
Federal Marshals don't usually arrest people. That is not their purpose.

The FBI does.
Federal Arrest Warrants | Surrendering to Law Enforcement

Most of the time, if a federal judge or magistrate has issued a warrant for your arrest, you find out about it when law enforcement officers arrest you.

If you learn that a federal warrant has been issued for your arrest, you should contact an attorney immediately. Unless you want to spend your life living as a fugitive, it is always better to surrender to the U.S. Marshal’s Office than it is to wait for them to find you and arrest you.

The best way to surrender is to retain a lawyer who will contact the U.S. Marshal’s Office on your behalf. Your lawyer can arrange for the time and place of your surrender. In some cases, the Marshal’s Office will want to arrest you before you have a chance to surrender, even if they know that you plan to surrender

That doesn't contradict what I said. Try learning to read. They take care of you AFTER you get arrested or you are a fugitive.

https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/overview.pdf
 
There is no reason to say that it was leaked, because it is not a secret. He sent the letter because it contradicted what he had reported to Congress earlier.

It was a letter to congress. If Comey wanted it made public, he would have released it. Instead the republicans in congress leaked the letter. Just like the professor who leaked Comeys notes, which as you pointed out, were not secret either.

I did not point them out. He release notes of a private conversation with the President to a third party. They were property of the federal government, thus giving them to a third party to publish should have gotten him in deep doo doo..
 
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.


Couple of things, the big elections are next year and it is virtually impossible that Mueller will get a conviction on any indictment his grand jury hands down. The Daily Beast is claiming that Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix is the subject, which if correct means that the indictment will be laughed out of any court in the nation. Mueller is attempting to distract from the revealed collusion of Russia, Clinton, and Comey.

Clinton is above the law, but Comey could actually end up in prison when the smoke clears.
 
That doesn't contradict what I said. Try learning to read. They take care of you AFTER you get arrested or you are a fugitive.

https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/overview.pdf

Hey stooopid, read your own citation.

The Marshals Service occupies a uniquely central position in the federal justice system. It is the enforcement arm of the federal courts, involved in virtually every federal law enforcement initiative.

Mueller just got a federal court to indict, and a federal judge will issue a warrant.
 
That doesn't contradict what I said. Try learning to read. They take care of you AFTER you get arrested or you are a fugitive.

https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/overview.pdf
Robert Mueller doesn't have the power to arrest. He has the FBI working for him but he's not in charge of the FBI.

When a federal judge issues a warrant, and there is no agency with arrest authority, it oges to the Federal Marshall Service.

Still didn't read what I posted? Typical know-nothing.

The FBI has the power to arrest Mueller, do they not?
 
Somehow Manifort got hired by Trump.....and it appears he's the target.
But, the media will make it look like Trump has something to do with whatever Manifort did before he hired him.


I thought Manafort approached Trump first... and he offered to work for FREE.
 

Forum List

Back
Top