Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still didn't read what I posted? Typical know-nothing.
The FBI has the power to arrest Mueller, do they not?
That doesn't contradict what I said. Try learning to read. They take care of you AFTER you get arrested or you are a fugitive.
https://www.usmarshals.gov/duties/factsheets/overview.pdf
Hey stooopid, read your own citation.
The Marshals Service occupies a uniquely central position in the federal justice system. It is the enforcement arm of the federal courts, involved in virtually every federal law enforcement initiative.
Mueller just got a federal court to indict, and a federal judge will issue a warrant.
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....
1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...
2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...
Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment
So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?
The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.
A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.
On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.
Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.
The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.
Judicial Security
Since 1789, the U.S. Marshals Service has been the enforcement arm of the federal courts
The Marshals have the broadest arrest authority among federal law enforcement agencies.
The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for the care and custody of federal prisoners from the time of their arrest by a federal agency (or remand by a judge) until they are acquitted, committed to their designated Federal Bureau of Prisons institution or otherwise ordered released from Marshals custody.
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
Good! I am glad we can agree that you are wrong. Thank you for posting proof of my assertion.
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....
1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...
2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...
Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment
So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?
The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.
A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.
On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.
Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.
The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.
Good! I am glad we can agree that you are wrong. Thank you for posting proof of my assertion.
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
Your own citation says the opposite.
The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for the care and custody of federal prisoners from the time of their arrest by a federal agency (or remand by a judge) until they are acquitted, committed to their designated Federal Bureau of Prisons institution or otherwise ordered released from Marshals custody.
As much as it pains me to say this, but Adm. Rockwell is right. They serve summons and things like that, but they don't actually do the initial arrest..
After the individual has been put in the prison system, THEN the Marshals are responsible for transporting the prisoner, and will continue to shuffle them around as necessary until they are released.
After the individual has been put in the prison system, THEN the Marshals are responsible for transporting the prisoner, and will continue to shuffle them around as necessary until they are released.
The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for the care and custody of federal prisoners from the time of their arrest by a federal agency (or remand by a judge) until they are acquitted, committed to their designated Federal Bureau of Prisons institution or otherwise ordered released from Marshals custody.
After the individual has been put in the prison system, THEN the Marshals are responsible for transporting the prisoner, and will continue to shuffle them around as necessary until they are released.
Don't you know....the trumpanzees are victims of EVERYONE.There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....
1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...
2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...
Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment
So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?
The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.
A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.
On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.
Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.
The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.
but isn't mueller a republican?
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
Good! I am glad we can agree that you are wrong. Thank you for posting proof of my assertion.
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
Your own citation says the opposite.
The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for the care and custody of federal prisoners from the time of their arrest by a federal agency (or remand by a judge) until they are acquitted, committed to their designated Federal Bureau of Prisons institution or otherwise ordered released from Marshals custody.
The US Marshals do not normally investigate crimes, nor do they normally arrest people. If you agree to surrender and then don't, you are a fugitive and fall under their purview..
I have some personal experience with the US Marshals. Do you?
The uniquely central position is that they don't arrest people and they don't incarcerate people. The lie between the law enforcement arms and the bureau of prisons.
Let me educate you .
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fjs10.pdf
In 2010, the U.S. Marshals Service arrested and booked 179,489 suspects for a federal offense The number of suspects arrested and booked for violations of federal law increased from 144,072 in 2006 to 179,489 in 2010—an average annual increase of 6% per year
