muellers indictment is typical democrat play to effect November elections....

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The US Marshals do not normally investigate crimes, nor do they normally arrest people. If you agree to surrender and then don't, you are a fugitive and fall under their purview..

If a federal judge issues an arrest warrant, it's the US Marshall service that arrests the person

Where did you get that? Read the first page of your link. Don't you think they would mention that if it was their primary duty?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The US Marshals do not normally investigate crimes, nor do they normally arrest people. If you agree to surrender and then don't, you are a fugitive and fall under their purview..

If a federal judge issues an arrest warrant, it's the US Marshall service that arrests the person

BTW, Marshal has only one "l".

 

[Borillar]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

Yeah, he's a Republican. He's investigating Russians, not Republicans. He hired Democrats to do the nuts and bolt works on the investigation. Then it come to light he might have quashed an investigation in Hillary and Obama selling uranium to these same Russians in the past.

Curiouser and curiouser it gets!

 

[jillian]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

mueller isn't a democrat, dum dum

 

[Dale Smith]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

mueller isn't a democrat, dum dum

Mueller is a deep state operative that does the bidding of the owners of both political party establishment types. Seems that it was only 15 years ago that the leftards on the blogisphere were accusing Mueller of covering up the false flag event that was 9/11/01....now? Mueller is some kind of "hero" to them. This is incredibly bad theater..........sickening to witness while those like McCain, McConnell, Boehner, Hillary, Obama, Holder, Lynch, Comey and Wasserman are getting off "scot-free" thus far.

 

[bripat9643]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

 

[Borillar]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

 

[Dale Smith]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Mueller is "deep state".... party affiliation means nothing when the establishment types of both parties are owned by the very same banking oligarchs that has not only put us in this subservient position but the rest of the world that doesn't have the means to fend off the military arm of the Vatican.....and that is EXACTLY what our military is.

 

[Borillar]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

 

[Kosh]

Someone is being charged?

Indictment in Mueller's Russia probe to be served Monday: report

Yes we know more unnamed sources have said this. But we will see in reality if the far left media such as CNN and NBC have accurate sources on this. So far they are not doing so good with their "sources".

 

[Dale Smith]

but isn't mueller a republican?

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

Russian connections that as a Senator that he talked to someone from Russia? How is Sessions connected to Russia, how much money did he get for having a conversation with someone from there? Why does the Podesta brothers and the Hildebeast's ties to the Russians along with millions of FRNs deposited into their accounts not even get a sniff from the lamestream Operation Mockingbird media????

 

[Borillar]

Yeah, he's a republican. He was appointed by a republican, and he's investigating a republican administration. Obviously, it must be a vast left wing conspiracy.

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

Russian connections that as a Senator that he talked to someone from Russia? How is Sessions connected to Russia, how much money did he get for having a conversation with someone from there? Why does the Podesta brothers and the Hildebeast's ties to the Russians along with millions of FRNs deposited into their accounts not even get a sniff from the lamestream Operation Mockingbird media????


View attachment 157324

Why did he recuse himself then? Did democrats use the Jedi mind trick on him?

 

[Dale Smith]

He's as Republican as Pol Pot. He served under a Democrat for about 5 years, and Obama didn't have a problem with him.

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

Russian connections that as a Senator that he talked to someone from Russia? How is Sessions connected to Russia, how much money did he get for having a conversation with someone from there? Why does the Podesta brothers and the Hildebeast's ties to the Russians along with millions of FRNs deposited into their accounts not even get a sniff from the lamestream Operation Mockingbird media????


View attachment 157324

Why did he recuse himself then? Did democrats use the Jedi mind trick on him?

I would like to know that myself. I would also like to know as to why he is sitting on his hands as it pertains to Uranium One, Libya, the CIA funding of ISIS and a litany of other crimes perpetuated by deep state operatives. He is either one of them or intimidated by them that they will harm is family or perhaps he has been compromised.

 

[Kosh]

He is a republican. He was appointed to his position by a republican Attorney General in a republican administration in order to investigate allegations against the same administration. Maybe Sessions should have looked for a more compliant lapdog to appoint.

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

Russian connections that as a Senator that he talked to someone from Russia? How is Sessions connected to Russia, how much money did he get for having a conversation with someone from there? Why does the Podesta brothers and the Hildebeast's ties to the Russians along with millions of FRNs deposited into their accounts not even get a sniff from the lamestream Operation Mockingbird media????


View attachment 157324

Why did he recuse himself then? Did democrats use the Jedi mind trick on him?

I would like to know that myself. I would also like to know as to why he is sitting on his hands as it pertains to Uranium One, Libya, the CIA funding of ISIS and a litany of other crimes perpetuated by deep state operatives. He is either one of them or intimidated by them that they will harm is family or perhaps he has been compromised.

He pandered to the far left. Pandering to the far left is never the answer.

I am sure that Obama left such a big mess that it will take years just to start investigations into these things.

 

[Reasonable]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

I haven't seen wingnuts this spooked since they found the Nixon tapes.

 

[Dale Smith]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

I haven't seen wingnuts this spooked since they found the Nixon tapes.

I am not a "wingnut" and neither am I "spooked". I simply understand how things work in this banana republic that is USA.INC.......capiche'?

 

[Reasonable]

Sessions is the attorney general and he did NOT appoint Mueller. That was the Assistant Attorney General Rothenstein, whose name has already surfaced in the Uranium One fiasco.

Oh, that's right. Forgot that Sessions had to recuse himself because he lied about his own Russian connections. So Mueller, a republican, was appointed by Rothenstein, a republican, because Sessions, a republican, had to recuse himself. Mueller, a republican is investigating the republican Trump administration. So obviously, the democrats have something to do with it.

Russian connections that as a Senator that he talked to someone from Russia? How is Sessions connected to Russia, how much money did he get for having a conversation with someone from there? Why does the Podesta brothers and the Hildebeast's ties to the Russians along with millions of FRNs deposited into their accounts not even get a sniff from the lamestream Operation Mockingbird media????


View attachment 157324

Why did he recuse himself then? Did democrats use the Jedi mind trick on him?

I would like to know that myself. I would also like to know as to why he is sitting on his hands as it pertains to Uranium One, Libya, the CIA funding of ISIS and a litany of other crimes perpetuated by deep state operatives. He is either one of them or intimidated by them that they will harm is family or perhaps he has been compromised.

He pandered to the far left. Pandering to the far left is never the answer.

I am sure that Obama left such a big mess that it will take years just to start investigations into these things.

The main event is the Mueller investigation and the litany of upcoming indictments against Trump's cabinet and possibly one just for him.
Your fantasies of getting Obama or Hillary is just your mind playing tricks on you to prevent your emotional being from collapsing with the bad news that's ahead of you. Do you know how horrendous this looks having such a crooked administration and multiple indictments after only in office for 9 months?
People will look back at this administration and point >> MOST CORRUPT ONE EVER!

 

[Reasonable]

There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

I haven't seen wingnuts this spooked since they found the Nixon tapes.

I am not a "wingnut" and neither am I "spooked". I simply understand how things work in this banana republic that is USA.INC.......capiche'?

This is your worst nightmare come true and both you and I know it.