muellers indictment is typical democrat play to effect November elections....

I love the words "MAY" and "Might" used by every single outlet reporting this except FOX who has been reporting responsibly that they do not have credible information as to who might be in the sights...
You mean “except Fox, who will fall on their swords before ever allowing anything but praise for the dear leader to appear on their network.”

Fox News report in 2018: “Trump Still Winning! Best Checkers Player in San Quentin!”


Wow....your post was so good I am going to email it to President hilary.....or was that President Jeb Bush........or how about we mail it to the NFL......the ones that thought they could take on Trump too.....or hollywood, the ones who tried to smear him with sexual harrassment....how is that going for them now?

You guys...please.....keep underestimating Trump......we need more democrats kicked out of office...
Hollywood will have record revenue again, Jeb Bush is a moron that you loved until Trump told you to stop, the NFL will have record revenue again, and Hillary is still living inside your head.
"Hollywood will have record revenue again,"

IS that why they posted a 15% loss in revenue last quarter? LOL retard!
Oh yeah? 2016 was a record year despite you braindead Trump sheep saying all the same shit, and 2017 will be the same.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/2016-box-office-record-year-crosses-11-billion-959300
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?
The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?


Rosenstein, mccabe, holder, lynch, tony podesta, john podesta.....also john podesta's daughter........the list is long and filled with democrats.....all sucking up to the Russians.....and blaming the Republicans...
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?
The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?
Oh really please enlighten me about the PROVEN criminal behavior by all you mentioned. Even the E-mail scandal hasn't led to any indictments. You have literally every branch of government at your disposal but can't make anything stick. Oh and btw I don't have too prove that Trump has done anything. Although it's actually not that difficult to do considering Trump has over 4000 lawsuits accrued in 3 decades of which he did lose quite a few USA TODAY Network: Dive into Donald Trump's thousands of lawsuits
He settled the Trump U lawsuit for instance for 25 million dollar, hardly the deeds of an innocent man Judge approves $25 million Trump University settlement. I replied as a direct response to your assertion that nothing but things directly related to Russia should be considered by voters, at which I replied with the question as to why you do not care if the President of the United States broke the law? While caring deeply about Clinton and all those who oppose Trump ?
 
A filing on the local level is usually given to a clerk, by the prosecutor's clerk, in the very busy clerks office. How it is done in the Federal System is likely the same, thus the official in question who leaked could be the clerk or one of his or her colleagues or even the spouse of someone in the office.
 
I love the words "MAY" and "Might" used by every single outlet reporting this except FOX who has been reporting responsibly that they do not have credible information as to who might be in the sights...
You mean “except Fox, who will fall on their swords before ever allowing anything but praise for the dear leader to appear on their network.”

Fox News report in 2018: “Trump Still Winning! Best Checkers Player in San Quentin!”


Wow....your post was so good I am going to email it to President hilary.....or was that President Jeb Bush........or how about we mail it to the NFL......the ones that thought they could take on Trump too.....or hollywood, the ones who tried to smear him with sexual harrassment....how is that going for them now?

You guys...please.....keep underestimating Trump......we need more democrats kicked out of office...
Hollywood will have record revenue again, Jeb Bush is a moron that you loved until Trump told you to stop, the NFL will have record revenue again, and Hillary is still living inside your head.

There's lots of empty space between his ears.
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?
The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?
Oh really please enlighten me about the PROVEN criminal behavior by all you mentioned. Even the E-mail scandal hasn't led to any indictments. You have literally every branch of government at your disposal but can't make anything stick. Oh and btw I don't have too prove that Trump has done anything. Although it's actually not that difficult to do considering Trump has over 4000 lawsuits accrued in 3 decades of which he did lose quite a few USA TODAY Network: Dive into Donald Trump's thousands of lawsuits
He settled the Trump U lawsuit for instance for 25 million dollar, hardly the deeds of an innocent man Judge approves $25 million Trump University settlement. I replied as a direct response to your assertion that nothing but things directly related to Russia should be considered by voters, at which I replied with the question as to why you do not care if the President of the United States broke the law? While caring deeply about Clinton and all those who oppose Trump ?


They controlled the FBI, and the Department of Justice.......that is why no indictments happened...moron.
 
Mueller leaked the indictment of Friday to make that the topic of weekend
political shows and get the spotlight off of him and the rest of Zero's and HRC's
crooks.

Somebody had to do something to put focus back on this investigation.

If his indictment isn't about Russia then Trump will have a field day on twitter
and the AMERICAN PEOPLE are gonna start asking..."I thought this was about
Russian Collusion."

The FBI undercover agent testifies in roughly two weeks before Congress.

After that the Federal Marshals maybe coming to arrest Mueller.
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?

The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?

Trump has attempted and failed in his attempt to obstruct justice.
 
“In the only conversation I’ve had with Robert Mueller, I stressed to him the importance of cutting out the leaks,” Gowdy, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.” Gowdy slams Mueller team over leaks about charges in Trump-Russia probe
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?
The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?
Oh really please enlighten me about the PROVEN criminal behavior by all you mentioned. Even the E-mail scandal hasn't led to any indictments. You have literally every branch of government at your disposal but can't make anything stick. Oh and btw I don't have too prove that Trump has done anything. Although it's actually not that difficult to do considering Trump has over 4000 lawsuits accrued in 3 decades of which he did lose quite a few USA TODAY Network: Dive into Donald Trump's thousands of lawsuits
He settled the Trump U lawsuit for instance for 25 million dollar, hardly the deeds of an innocent man Judge approves $25 million Trump University settlement. I replied as a direct response to your assertion that nothing but things directly related to Russia should be considered by voters, at which I replied with the question as to why you do not care if the President of the United States broke the law? While caring deeply about Clinton and all those who oppose Trump ?


They controlled the FBI, and the Department of Justice.......that is why no indictments happened...moron.
What's stopping them from doing it now? Trump said he'd put up a special prosecutor on day one, that hasn't happened why? Oh and calling people moron's doesn't make you look smarter, it makes you look like an asshole.
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?

The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?

Trump has attempted and failed in his attempt to obstruct justice.


How did he attempt that exactly? The only ones so far who have done this are mueller, comey, rosenstein, holder, lynch and obama, who knew about the Russians bribing and extorting government agencies and making pay for play contributions to the clinton foundation...and then they buried all of the facts and forced an undercover witness to sign a non disclosure agreement.....
 
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.
Still don't know the difference between a noun and an adjective.
?
Why read an ignoramus?
 
You watch mueller is going to indict all those in uranium one as involved in Russian collusion so to cast dispersion on their testimonies

We do know there hasn't been one gram shipped to Russia?
It's against federal law.
Better resurrect Vince Foster
 
Assuming that the indictment is for an ancient tax evasion crime or some other "non-collusion" crime no 2018 voter cares. Its just swamp noise.
Well you are now saying that you do not care if the president of the United States is a criminal, while the whole campaign was one long rant how Clinton was a criminal and should be locked up. The whole time one of the favorite excuses you guys gave for the Russia probe was. " Mueller hasn't pressed charges so nothing happened". Now it is changing to Mueller is a puppet of the Democrats. Just a reminder Mueller and Comey both were registered Republicans. Why is it that any of you is perfectly willing to assume guilt by Clinton without any charges being pressed but are also willing to forgive beforehand ANY criminality by the sitting president?

The only people with evidence of criminal conduct are the Clinton's, Obama, Mueller, Comey, and the list goes on... we have physical evidence of this. what has Trump done?

Trump has attempted and failed in his attempt to obstruct justice.


How did he attempt that exactly? The only ones so far who have done this are mueller, comey, rosenstein, holder, lynch and obama, who knew about the Russians bribing and extorting government agencies and making pay for play contributions to the clinton foundation...and then they buried all of the facts and forced an undercover witness to sign a non disclosure agreement.....
This idiot cant see the forest because of the trees surrounding him..
 
You watch mueller is going to indict all those in uranium one as involved in Russian collusion so to cast dispersion on their testimonies

We do know there hasn't been one gram shipped to Russia?
It's against federal law.
Better resurrect Vince Foster
Wrong:

Over 300 tons was removed from Wyoming mines and shipped, without permit to a Canada holding facility owned by the Kremlin controlled company.. The NRC cant find it now... NOW why would that be? Records indicate it was shipped OVERSEA's..

Those same mines today, are now under federal control and nothing is leaving..
 
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.


How many elections are there going on in 2017 that this will affect? Please list them. :)
 
Mueller a Republican......check
Mueller appointed by Republicans....check
Republicans control all three branches of government.....check


Well, that's crystal clear. It's the Democrats' fault!!!!!
upload_2017-10-29_12-17-31.jpeg
DO SOMETHING!
 
There are two parts to muellers announcing an indictment for Monday....

1) He is now under scrutiny for his role in hiding the Uranium One scandal when he was FBI director, he has direct involvement in burying the investigation into Russian bribes to the clinton foundation and other government entities, as well as the creation of the file on Trump which was used to get FISA court warrants to spy on Trump's people...

2) There are big elections coming on November 8...and democrat special prosecutors use their offices to indict prominent Republicans in order to help the democrats...even when there is no chance of any conviction.....the effort is to simply get them indicted in time for the election...

Robert Mueller's well-timed indictment

So why is there such a hurry to indict a Republican now?

The key is that the indictment comes in late October. Right before a November election. There is pattern of October indictments against Republicans.

A previous indictment that came at this time of year was against Sheriff Joe Arpaio. On October 25, 2016, Arpaio was indicted for contempt of court. On November 8, 2016, he lost his re-election bid. In 2017, he was denied the right to a jury trial, convicted, then pardoned by President Trump.

On October 30, 1992, Former Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger was indicted regarding the Iran Contra Affair. On November 3, 1992, President George HW Bush lost re-election. On December 11, 1992, a judge quickly threw out the indictment. Later that month, Bush pardoned Weinberger, thus preventing subsequent well-timed indictments.

Another, even more abusive example of a set-up involves a conviction. Senator Ted Stevens was convicted on October 27, 2008 for failing to report gifts. On November 4, 2008, he barely lost re-election. In 2009, Democrat Attorney General Eric Holder learned that prosecutors withheld evidence, sent a key witness away, and possibly allowed another witness to perjure himself. Knowing that Stevens was about to reveal this in court, Holder beat him to it and dismissed the case. Stevens was exonerated, but he still was an ex-Senator and the prosecutors were not punished.

The pattern is that Democrats like to indict and convict prominent Republicans just before an election to soil the Republican brand. On November 7, there will be two gubernatorial, one congressional, and several mayoral elections, so the Democrats have plenty of incentive. Is Mueller a Democrat? Nobody knows, but Democrats really, really like him.

There are no "big elections on November 8th".
 

Forum List

Back
Top