Asclepias
Diamond Member
I think they will be happy they can afford to pay their necessities and work harder to go up in wages.OTE="Asclepias, post: 21300138, member: 44774"]You dont have to give everyone a raise because you raise MW. Thats needeless conjecture.I think most of them do get it, but the rules of partisan debate forbid them admitting any tradeoffs, any downside, any weakness to their favored policies. And if they're following those "debate" rules, you'll never get an honest answer out of them. They'll dodge, juke, jive and lie their asses off - anything but face reality.
Moronic argument. Your stated downside is unsubstantiated. You are asking others to make your argument for you.
Paying people enough to live on is a straight up win win for everyone. Long term win for businesses and taxpayers. Income inequality is a loser for everyone.
It is what it is.
Not if you raise it for everyone , god you have no common sense do you?
I didn't say that, I said no one gets ahead if everyone gets a raise and once again people making $8 to $15 are getting fucked up the ass if the national minimum wage is raised to $15..
They spent all that time trying to get ahead only to realize they now make minimum wage .
.
Again look at new Zealand which you refuse to acknowledge. More money doesn't equal more wealth if you have to pay more for a bag of Doritos .
.[/QUOTE]
Of course more money doesnt equal more wealth. Wealth is measured in time. Besides raising the MW is not to make people wealthy. Its to allow them to survive without being on welfare.