tinydancer
Diamond Member
What justified the E.U land grab of Ukraine? The Crimean people voted to be annexed by Russia while the people of the Ukraine didn't get the option of being toppled by the E.U nor did they have the option of refusing mandates of the IMF that is attempting to make the rules on what they can or cannot do with their resources....this is what the IMF has always done. Why would Russia be fine with a foreign intervention of a country that has been a buffer between them and the E.U and NATO that would place NATO troops on the Russian border? Would you be fine with China annexing Mexico so Chinese troops would have access to OUR border? You live in a bubble, little man.
Russia deployed its forces in Ukraine and annexed a part of it, popular or not this a blatant violation of international laws that Russia was apropriately slammed for with sanctions.
It's was the proper response then and further sanctions are apropriate now that Russsia got caught hacking American political institutions and fucking with our elections.
But the E.U sponsored overthrow of the Ukraine was not a blatant violation of international law???
No dummy, it is not. International law certainly does not prohibit sponsoring. In fact in Ukraine, Russia was by far the bigger sponsor, offering many billions more to Ukraine compared to EU deal.
The 17 December 2013 Ukrainian–Russian action plan is a de facto defunct[1][2] treaty between the President of UkraineViktor Yanukovych and Russian President Vladimir Putin on 17 December 2013 whereby it was agreed that Russia would buy $15 billion of Ukrainian Eurobonds and that the cost of Russian natural gas supplied to Ukraine would be lowered to $268 per 1,000 cubic metres (the price was more than $400 at the time).
17 December 2013 Ukrainian–Russian action plan - Wikipedia
What does that have to do with the E.U and George Soros intentionally causing riots and funding mercenaries to overthrow the Ukraine? Why would Crimea be obligated to stay as apart of the Ukraine when vast majority of their populace wanted no part of the E.U and their IMF cohorts that always come in and put the countries in debt?
According to YOUR logic, cups funded by outside forces = Good
Provinces that want to align with another country = Bad......
Do you even see how fucked up that is at all???
Made up bullshit.
There is a huge support for closer ties with European Union in Ukraine, especially western Ukraine:
Ukrainians Prefer European Union, U.S. to Russia
Did Soros buy that too?
First off the President of the Ukraine and Hillary's buddy Pinchuk who with other left wing oligarchs donated multi millions to the Clinton Foundation.
More that the Arab Gulf States. 'mmkay?
The President and Pinchuk own virtually all the media in the Western Ukraine and in Kiev. So as the coup was going down and afterwards the lefties who wanted to join the EU controlled the message.
They still do.
To the Gallup Poll. It was taken in 2014. Guess who wasn't polled?
Oh Crimea. Eastern Ukrainians. Ethnic Russians. Gallup left out huge regions. Donetsk and Luhansk for example.
AKA skewed freaking poll that doesn't mean jack shit.