CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,578
- 69,675
- 2,330
Ah, the sweet smell of duplicate threads. When the true believers get fed their talking points, their reflex action is to immediately cut and paste.
For inexplicable reasons, deniers are claiming that study as some kind of endorsement of their paranoid conspiracy ravings and hilariously bad debunked science. Normal people, however, just see it as science working in the normal way. There are disagreements, more data is found, and things are worked out.
We're looking some major logic failures from the deniers here. The study was basically about precipitation. Global warming is about temperature, hence the world "warming". Precipitation and temperature are different things. Contrary to bad denier logic, more precipitation does not mean colder temperatures. It snows more in Antarctica as temperatures there rise, being warmer air holds more moisture, and it still never gets warm enough to rain instead of snow. Basic science, which is why deniers fail so completely at it.
Let's have some more fun with the deniers. They're heaping praise on Zwally, the study author. So what else did he say?
He says that means sea level rise elsewhere is worse than previously thought.
---
"The good news is that Antarctica is not currently contributing to sea level rise, but is taking 0.23 millimeters per year away," Zwally said. "But this is also bad news. If the 0.27 millimeters per year of sea level rise attributed to Antarctica in the IPCC report is not really coming from Antarctica, there must be some other contribution to sea level rise that is not accounted for."
---
And he says the trend is for more warming and more melt in Antarctica
---
But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica's growth to reverse, according to Zwally. "If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they've been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years—I don't think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses."
---
Ooh, deniers are in a tough spot now. They just declared Zwally was infallible, then there goes Zwally supporting mainstream global warming science. So will they now backpedal frantically, or just run away?
![Guam-from-air.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi2.wp.com%2Fwww.thedailychronic.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F07%2FGuam-from-air.jpg%3Fresize%3D795%252C470&hash=36ff332eea66743aac8ea93b328b1d39)
^ Guam, proudly refusing to sink underwater in response to nutty AGW Cult "Water iz rizin!!!!!" claim