NASA's top global warming nut admits warming has stopped for 10 years...

Pretty easy to have fraud like this when you control all the data and manipulate it at will to match your fantasy. Further, it aids the ends of multiple governments in wealth redistribution, so they have no reason to interfere.
 
Pretty easy to have fraud like this when you control all the data and manipulate it at will to match your fantasy. Further, it aids the ends of multiple governments in wealth redistribution, so they have no reason to interfere.

How long have conservatives been pushing "wealth redistribution"?

Honestly....can you guys just think for 15 seconds before posting this stuff?
 
conservatives don't push wealth redistribution....that is a liberal scheme. You apparently are the one who doesn't think. Guess you think social welfare is a conservative idea.
 
I thought you just said politics had nothing to do with climate science. Thanks for confirming the link.
 
I thought you just said politics had nothing to do with climate science. Thanks for confirming the link.

It doesn't.

Science is science.

But Deniers insist that a huge global political conspiracy is in place, thus making it a political issue.

Outside the US, it simply is not a political issue. All major conservative parties are up to speed on it, and largely agree on what the science is telling us. It's a no brainer for most conservatives.
 
Globally, the public has less and less belief in the science of climate change as their alerts fail time and time again.
 
Globally, the public has less and less belief in the science of climate change as their alerts fail time and time again.


that is why they have had to change the term so many times

global warming

climate change

weather change

ect ect

--LOL
 
Globally, the public has less and less belief in the science of climate change as their alerts fail time and time again.

No, that's another childish myth.

Global surveys record understanding of climate science as around 65% - 70%, and up to 90% in countries where the effects are clearly evident.

There is a thread on this in this forum with all the data.
 
Jon -

that is why they have had to change the term so many times

global warming

climate change

weather change

ect ect

Actually no, that's another childish myth. The only person using the term 'weather change' is you.

The term climate change came into use 25 years ago - glad to see you finaly noticed.

It's good to know that a person who can not spell "etc" can still be a scientific genius.
 
Jon -

that is why they have had to change the term so many times

global warming

climate change

weather change

ect ect

Actually no, that's another childish myth. The only person using the term 'weather change' is you.

The term climate change came into use 25 years ago - glad to see you finaly noticed.

It's good to know that a person who can not spell "etc" can still be a scientific genius.

oh brother

--LOL
 
Globally, the public has less and less belief in the science of climate change as their alerts fail time and time again.

No, that's another childish myth.

Global surveys record understanding of climate science as around 65% - 70%, and up to 90% in countries where the effects are clearly evident.

There is a thread on this in this forum with all the data.

In which countries are the effects "clearly evident?" I'm not aware of any. I think you mean countries where the populace has been thoroughly brainwashed and bamboozled.
 
Jon -

that is why they have had to change the term so many times

global warming

climate change

weather change

ect ect

Actually no, that's another childish myth. The only person using the term 'weather change' is you.

The term climate change came into use 25 years ago - glad to see you finaly noticed.

It's good to know that a person who can not spell "etc" can still be a scientific genius.

The term "climate change" only came into widespread use among AGW cultists about 5 years ago when it became obvious that the climate wasn't warming an longer.
 
In which countries are the effects "clearly evident?" I'm not aware of any. I think you mean countries where the populace has been thoroughly brainwashed and bamboozled.

I wouldn't have thought for a moment that you would be aware of them.

I guess the effects are most evident in Australia, Spain, New Zealand, Bangladesh, Mozambique, Chile, Argentina, India, Alaska, Peru, Bolivia and increasingly in Scandinavia.

Elsewhere I can appreciate the effects may not be quite so visible, though they still evident if you look at climate data.

I have no idea why people would be "brainwashed" by their own first-hand experience.
 
In which countries are the effects "clearly evident?" I'm not aware of any. I think you mean countries where the populace has been thoroughly brainwashed and bamboozled.

I wouldn't have thought for a moment that you would be aware of them.

I guess the effects are most evident in Australia, Spain, New Zealand, Bangladesh, Mozambique, Chile, Argentina, India, Alaska, Peru, Bolivia and increasingly in Scandinavia.

Elsewhere I can appreciate the effects may not be quite so visible, though they still evident if you look at climate data.

I have no idea why people would be "brainwashed" by their own first-hand experience.

Climate data forged by a small group of scientists who then release this data to researchers and the public? :lol:

Btw, US meterologists don't believe in human caused climate change.
 
So the idea that conservative governments around the world are part of some massive socialist conspiracy is just a silly, infantile fantasy, isn't it?

Which conservative goverments might those be siagon? Just name a few of actual conservative governments in the world. Lets see what passes for conservative in your skewed worldview. Hope you aren't going to say the US because you would prove how much you don't know right off the bat.
 
I thought you just said politics had nothing to do with climate science. Thanks for confirming the link.

It doesn't.

Science is science.

Not necessarily when it is government science. How many examples of governent science that turned out to be a failure do you need before it sinks into that thick skull of yours. You might start with the idea that the earth is at the center of everyting and continue on down to eugenics...right on down to plate tectonics...to quasicrystals.
 
Save Liberty -

Try reading the post again - what I am talking about here also includes firsthand experience of climate change.

I have no idea what you mean by a "small group" of scientists - the actual number is in the low thousands globaly, working in a hundred countries and at a couple of hundred institutes and universities.

US meterologists don't believe in human caused climate change.

Actually they do, but I am aware there is some really very funny stuff about this on blogs that someone extremely gullible might swallow.
 
So the idea that conservative governments around the world are part of some massive socialist conspiracy is just a silly, infantile fantasy, isn't it?

Which conservative goverments might those be siagon? Just name a few of actual conservative governments in the world. Lets see what passes for conservative in your skewed worldview. Hope you aren't going to say the US because you would prove how much you don't know right off the bat.

My word.....could you get any more stupid?

There are conservative governments in England, Finland, New Zealand, Germany....shall I do on?

Honestly - how can you not know this? Isn't it common knowledge?
 

Forum List

Back
Top